Projecting decisions. Unfolding architectural design practice in decision-making processes

IF 3 Q3 MANAGEMENT
EURO Journal on Decision Processes Pub Date : 2026-01-01 Epub Date: 2026-01-06 DOI:10.1016/j.ejdp.2026.100068
Elena Todella
{"title":"Projecting decisions. Unfolding architectural design practice in decision-making processes","authors":"Elena Todella","doi":"10.1016/j.ejdp.2026.100068","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study explores the role of specific design documents – as visual artefacts – in shaping decision-making processes, highlighting how they can, at key moments, overcome conflicts by negotiating different perspectives. Architectural design research has undergone significant paradigm shifts, primarily through traditional sociological and anthropological approaches to professional practices in engineering and architecture. While scholars have examined how practitioners operate and how practices unfold, they have yet to connect the specific performativity of each artefact within these processes to its effects. Focusing on practices, the research follows different strands of research. First, it draws on Actor-Network Theory (ANT) and recent ethnographies of architecture. Second, it links such perspective to Problem Structuring Methods (PSMs), focusing on interactions through artefacts. Finally, it contributes to a current debate in organization studies on the role of artefacts as boundary objects. Accordingly, the paper explores the role of architectural design practices in bringing forward effects in the decision-making process of a masterplan for developing an urban university campus. This paper makes a threefold contribution. First, in theoretical terms, tracing the performativity of architectural design practices. Second, in methodological terms, proposing a mapping methodology to trace such practices. Finally, it provides an interactive visualization tool.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":44104,"journal":{"name":"EURO Journal on Decision Processes","volume":"14 ","pages":"Article 100068"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EURO Journal on Decision Processes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2193943826000014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study explores the role of specific design documents – as visual artefacts – in shaping decision-making processes, highlighting how they can, at key moments, overcome conflicts by negotiating different perspectives. Architectural design research has undergone significant paradigm shifts, primarily through traditional sociological and anthropological approaches to professional practices in engineering and architecture. While scholars have examined how practitioners operate and how practices unfold, they have yet to connect the specific performativity of each artefact within these processes to its effects. Focusing on practices, the research follows different strands of research. First, it draws on Actor-Network Theory (ANT) and recent ethnographies of architecture. Second, it links such perspective to Problem Structuring Methods (PSMs), focusing on interactions through artefacts. Finally, it contributes to a current debate in organization studies on the role of artefacts as boundary objects. Accordingly, the paper explores the role of architectural design practices in bringing forward effects in the decision-making process of a masterplan for developing an urban university campus. This paper makes a threefold contribution. First, in theoretical terms, tracing the performativity of architectural design practices. Second, in methodological terms, proposing a mapping methodology to trace such practices. Finally, it provides an interactive visualization tool.
预测决策。在决策过程中展开建筑设计实践
本研究探讨了具体的设计文件——作为视觉人工制品——在塑造决策过程中的作用,强调了它们如何在关键时刻通过协商不同的观点来克服冲突。建筑设计研究经历了重大的范式转变,主要是通过传统的社会学和人类学方法到工程和建筑的专业实践。虽然学者们已经研究了实践者是如何操作的以及实践是如何展开的,但他们还没有将这些过程中每个人工制品的具体性能与其效果联系起来。该研究侧重于实践,遵循不同的研究方向。首先,它借鉴了行动者网络理论(ANT)和最近的建筑民族志。其次,它将这种观点与问题结构方法(psm)联系起来,重点关注通过工件的交互。最后,它有助于当前组织研究中关于人工制品作为边界对象的作用的辩论。因此,本文探讨了建筑设计实践在城市大学校园发展总体规划决策过程中的作用。这篇论文有三方面的贡献。首先,在理论方面,追溯建筑设计实践的表演性。其次,在方法论方面,提出了一种追踪此类实践的映射方法。最后,它提供了一个交互式可视化工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
10.00%
发文量
15
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书