Multifeature Ultrasound-Based Classification for Breast Lesions: A Comparative Study of PONS Image Enhancement Technology

IF 4.5
Sabahattin M. Daloglu MPhil , Ceren Coskun BSc , Gokce Bekar MSc , Senanur Sahin BSc , Haley P. Letter MD , Harvey Castro MD , Soner Hacihaliloglu MBA , Ilker Hacihaliloglu PhD
{"title":"Multifeature Ultrasound-Based Classification for Breast Lesions: A Comparative Study of PONS Image Enhancement Technology","authors":"Sabahattin M. Daloglu MPhil ,&nbsp;Ceren Coskun BSc ,&nbsp;Gokce Bekar MSc ,&nbsp;Senanur Sahin BSc ,&nbsp;Haley P. Letter MD ,&nbsp;Harvey Castro MD ,&nbsp;Soner Hacihaliloglu MBA ,&nbsp;Ilker Hacihaliloglu PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2025.100691","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To overcome critical limitations of B-mode ultrasound in artificial intelligence diagnostics—including poor image quality and operator variability—by developing a multifeature framework that combines raw B-mode scans with 2 optimized representations (enhanced ultrasound and quality-improved ultrasound) for robust breast cancer classification.</div></div><div><h3>Patients and Methods</h3><div>We conducted a retrospective study of 62,912 breast ultrasound scans (100%) from 688 patients (100%) at the Mayo Clinic (from December 01, 1989 to March 30, 2024). The study compared 3 deep learning architectures—graph convolutional networks (GCNs), masked autoencoders (MAEs), and multi-scale convolutional neural network (MSCNN)—using either standard B-mode inputs alone or combined with our enhanced features. Performance was evaluated through 3-fold cross-validation at the patient-level, with primary metrics including accuracy, area under the curve, F1-score, sensitivity, and specificity.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The multifeature approach reported substantial improvements across all metrics. For GCNs, multifeature integration increased accuracy from 0.508 to 0.845 and F1-score from 0.067 to 0.835. Sensitivity improved dramatically from 5.6% to 91.7%, while specificity showed a modest decrease from 85.7% to 79.0%. The MAE models showed different but complementary strengths, with multifeature integration improving accuracy from 0.775 to 0.873, F1-score from 0.785 to 0.822, and achieving perfect specificity (100%) while maintaining clinically acceptable sensitivity (71.1%). The MSCNN, included as a baseline convolutional architecture, showed minimal improvement with multifeature integration, with accuracy increasing slightly from 0.571 to 0.585 and specificity from 0.667 to 0.819. These results highlight the superior capability of GCNs and MAEs to effectively leverage multifeature information in breast ultrasound analysis compared with conventional MSCNN.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>PONS-enhanced multifeature ultrasound significantly improves breast cancer detection accuracy versus B-mode alone, offering complementary clinical solutions: GCNs for high sensitivity screening (91.7%) and MAEs for high-specificity diagnosis (100%). Results demonstrate clinical potential across diverse populations, with future work exploring enhanced fusion strategies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":94132,"journal":{"name":"Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes","volume":"10 1","pages":"Article 100691"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S254245482500102X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To overcome critical limitations of B-mode ultrasound in artificial intelligence diagnostics—including poor image quality and operator variability—by developing a multifeature framework that combines raw B-mode scans with 2 optimized representations (enhanced ultrasound and quality-improved ultrasound) for robust breast cancer classification.

Patients and Methods

We conducted a retrospective study of 62,912 breast ultrasound scans (100%) from 688 patients (100%) at the Mayo Clinic (from December 01, 1989 to March 30, 2024). The study compared 3 deep learning architectures—graph convolutional networks (GCNs), masked autoencoders (MAEs), and multi-scale convolutional neural network (MSCNN)—using either standard B-mode inputs alone or combined with our enhanced features. Performance was evaluated through 3-fold cross-validation at the patient-level, with primary metrics including accuracy, area under the curve, F1-score, sensitivity, and specificity.

Results

The multifeature approach reported substantial improvements across all metrics. For GCNs, multifeature integration increased accuracy from 0.508 to 0.845 and F1-score from 0.067 to 0.835. Sensitivity improved dramatically from 5.6% to 91.7%, while specificity showed a modest decrease from 85.7% to 79.0%. The MAE models showed different but complementary strengths, with multifeature integration improving accuracy from 0.775 to 0.873, F1-score from 0.785 to 0.822, and achieving perfect specificity (100%) while maintaining clinically acceptable sensitivity (71.1%). The MSCNN, included as a baseline convolutional architecture, showed minimal improvement with multifeature integration, with accuracy increasing slightly from 0.571 to 0.585 and specificity from 0.667 to 0.819. These results highlight the superior capability of GCNs and MAEs to effectively leverage multifeature information in breast ultrasound analysis compared with conventional MSCNN.

Conclusion

PONS-enhanced multifeature ultrasound significantly improves breast cancer detection accuracy versus B-mode alone, offering complementary clinical solutions: GCNs for high sensitivity screening (91.7%) and MAEs for high-specificity diagnosis (100%). Results demonstrate clinical potential across diverse populations, with future work exploring enhanced fusion strategies.
基于超声多特征的乳腺病变分类:PONS图像增强技术的比较研究
目的克服b超在人工智能诊断中的关键局限性,包括图像质量差和操作人员的可变性,通过开发一个多特征框架,将原始b超扫描与两种优化表示(增强超声和质量改进超声)相结合,实现强大的乳腺癌分类。患者和方法我们对1989年12月1日至2024年3月30日在梅奥诊所(Mayo Clinic)就诊的688例患者(100%)进行了62912次乳房超声扫描(100%)的回顾性研究。该研究比较了3种深度学习架构——图卷积网络(GCNs)、掩模自动编码器(MAEs)和多尺度卷积神经网络(MSCNN)——分别使用标准b模式输入或结合我们的增强功能。通过患者水平的3倍交叉验证来评估性能,主要指标包括准确性、曲线下面积、f1评分、敏感性和特异性。结果多特征方法报告了所有指标的实质性改进。对于GCNs,多特征集成将准确率从0.508提高到0.845,f1得分从0.067提高到0.835。敏感性从5.6%显著提高到91.7%,而特异性从85.7%适度下降到79.0%。MAE模型表现出不同但互补的优势,多特征整合将准确率从0.775提高到0.873,f1评分从0.785提高到0.822,在保持临床可接受的敏感性(71.1%)的同时达到完美的特异性(100%)。作为基线卷积架构的MSCNN在多特征整合后表现出最小的改善,准确率从0.571略微增加到0.585,特异性从0.667略微增加到0.819。这些结果突出了与传统MSCNN相比,GCNs和MAEs在乳腺超声分析中有效利用多特征信息的优势。结论pons增强的多特征超声较单纯b超可显著提高乳腺癌的检测准确率,为临床提供了GCNs高灵敏度筛查(91.7%)和MAEs高特异性诊断(100%)的互补解决方案。研究结果显示了在不同人群中的临床潜力,未来的工作将探索增强融合策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes
Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes Surgery, Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Public Health and Health Policy
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
49 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书