Digital transformation, open innovation and circular business model transition: The role of effectual logic

IF 12.9 1区 社会学 Q1 SOCIAL ISSUES
Technology in Society Pub Date : 2026-06-01 Epub Date: 2026-01-05 DOI:10.1016/j.techsoc.2026.103223
Safiya Mukhtar Alshibani , Sanjay Chaudhary , Snigdha Dash , Raj V. Mahto
{"title":"Digital transformation, open innovation and circular business model transition: The role of effectual logic","authors":"Safiya Mukhtar Alshibani ,&nbsp;Sanjay Chaudhary ,&nbsp;Snigdha Dash ,&nbsp;Raj V. Mahto","doi":"10.1016/j.techsoc.2026.103223","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Despite the theorized role of open innovation in shaping circular business models, there remains ambiguity about how open innovation can accelerate the transition toward circularity. Transition towards a circular business model typically presents obstacles for entrepreneurial organizations because they lack access to resources. Ambiguity remains on how organizations transitioning to a circular business model deploy open innovation strategies and what decision-making mechanisms underpin the value co-creation processes. We address the research question: How do organizations deploy open innovation in circular business models? We explore how open innovation is integrated with circular business models. Based on a qualitative analysis of forty-three open-ended online interviews and Gioia’s methodology, the findings reveal that effectual logic supports organizations in effectively deploying open innovation while pursuing a circular business model. The transition towards circularity raises dilemmas about leveraging collaborations, and effectuctual logic assists in integrating an open innovation strategy into the circular business model. By minimizing resource commitment, collaborating with diverse stakeholders, and continuously refining processes, managers pursuing circularity can effectively address the challenges encountered during the transition to circularity.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47979,"journal":{"name":"Technology in Society","volume":"85 ","pages":"Article 103223"},"PeriodicalIF":12.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Technology in Society","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160791X26000126","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIAL ISSUES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite the theorized role of open innovation in shaping circular business models, there remains ambiguity about how open innovation can accelerate the transition toward circularity. Transition towards a circular business model typically presents obstacles for entrepreneurial organizations because they lack access to resources. Ambiguity remains on how organizations transitioning to a circular business model deploy open innovation strategies and what decision-making mechanisms underpin the value co-creation processes. We address the research question: How do organizations deploy open innovation in circular business models? We explore how open innovation is integrated with circular business models. Based on a qualitative analysis of forty-three open-ended online interviews and Gioia’s methodology, the findings reveal that effectual logic supports organizations in effectively deploying open innovation while pursuing a circular business model. The transition towards circularity raises dilemmas about leveraging collaborations, and effectuctual logic assists in integrating an open innovation strategy into the circular business model. By minimizing resource commitment, collaborating with diverse stakeholders, and continuously refining processes, managers pursuing circularity can effectively address the challenges encountered during the transition to circularity.
数字化转型、开放式创新与循环商业模式转型:有效逻辑的作用
尽管开放式创新在形成循环商业模式中的理论作用,但关于开放式创新如何加速向循环的过渡,仍然存在模糊性。向循环商业模式的过渡通常会给企业家组织带来障碍,因为他们缺乏获取资源的途径。在向循环商业模式过渡的组织如何部署开放式创新战略以及支持价值共同创造过程的决策机制方面,仍然存在模糊性。我们解决了研究问题:组织如何在循环商业模式中部署开放式创新?我们探索开放式创新如何与循环商业模式相结合。基于对43个开放式在线访谈和Gioia方法的定性分析,研究结果表明,有效逻辑支持组织在追求循环商业模式的同时有效地部署开放式创新。向循环的转变带来了利用协作的困境,而有效的逻辑有助于将开放式创新战略整合到循环商业模式中。通过最小化资源承诺,与不同的涉众合作,以及不断地改进过程,追求循环的管理人员可以有效地处理在向循环过渡期间遇到的挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
17.90
自引率
14.10%
发文量
316
审稿时长
60 days
期刊介绍: Technology in Society is a global journal dedicated to fostering discourse at the crossroads of technological change and the social, economic, business, and philosophical transformation of our world. The journal aims to provide scholarly contributions that empower decision-makers to thoughtfully and intentionally navigate the decisions shaping this dynamic landscape. A common thread across these fields is the role of technology in society, influencing economic, political, and cultural dynamics. Scholarly work in Technology in Society delves into the social forces shaping technological decisions and the societal choices regarding technology use. This encompasses scholarly and theoretical approaches (history and philosophy of science and technology, technology forecasting, economic growth, and policy, ethics), applied approaches (business innovation, technology management, legal and engineering), and developmental perspectives (technology transfer, technology assessment, and economic development). Detailed information about the journal's aims and scope on specific topics can be found in Technology in Society Briefings, accessible via our Special Issues and Article Collections.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书