Foraging Behaviour and Host Responses of Oxpeckers (Buphagus spp.) Across Domestic and Wild Mammals

IF 1.4 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q4 ECOLOGY
Michael S. Lukubwe, Adrian J. F. K. Craig, Colin K. Munkutike, Ivan Sazima
{"title":"Foraging Behaviour and Host Responses of Oxpeckers (Buphagus spp.) Across Domestic and Wild Mammals","authors":"Michael S. Lukubwe,&nbsp;Adrian J. F. K. Craig,&nbsp;Colin K. Munkutike,&nbsp;Ivan Sazima","doi":"10.1111/aje.70148","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study investigated the foraging behaviours, host species utilisation, and spatial attachment preferences of Red-billed Oxpecker (<i>Buphagus erythrorhynchus</i>) and Yellow-billed Oxpecker (<i>Buphagus africanus</i>) in Salambala Conservancy, northeastern Namibia, from May to September 2023. A total of 1252 potential host animals were observed, including African buffalo (<i>Syncerus caffer</i>), cattle (<i>Bos taurus</i>), giraffe (<i>Giraffa camelopardalis</i>), and plains zebra (<i>Equus quagga</i>). Oxpecker-host interactions were recorded for 234 Red-billed Oxpecker and 69 Yellow-billed Oxpecker. Red-billed Oxpecker primarily exhibited perching and tick-feeding behaviours, particularly on buffalo and cattle, while Yellow-billed Oxpecker showed a stronger reliance on tick-feeding, especially on buffalo. Other feeding behaviours, such as the consumption of ear wax, mucus, and saliva, were mainly recorded on giraffe, suggesting resource diversification strategies. Host rejection and tolerance behaviours also differed among species, with buffalo and giraffe demonstrating higher tolerance levels compared to cattle and zebra, which exhibited elevated rejection responses. Oxpecker attachment patterns differed across host species and body regions. Preferred foraging regions included the back, head, and anogenital areas that are typically difficult for hosts to self-groom. These findings provide dry-season baseline data on oxpecker-host interactions in a mixed-use conservancy landscape and highlight behavioural flexibility in response to host species and tolerance. Interpretation of interspecific differences, particularly for Yellow-billed Oxpeckers, should be viewed as preliminary due to uneven sampling across hosts.</p>","PeriodicalId":7844,"journal":{"name":"African Journal of Ecology","volume":"64 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/aje.70148","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"African Journal of Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/aje.70148","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study investigated the foraging behaviours, host species utilisation, and spatial attachment preferences of Red-billed Oxpecker (Buphagus erythrorhynchus) and Yellow-billed Oxpecker (Buphagus africanus) in Salambala Conservancy, northeastern Namibia, from May to September 2023. A total of 1252 potential host animals were observed, including African buffalo (Syncerus caffer), cattle (Bos taurus), giraffe (Giraffa camelopardalis), and plains zebra (Equus quagga). Oxpecker-host interactions were recorded for 234 Red-billed Oxpecker and 69 Yellow-billed Oxpecker. Red-billed Oxpecker primarily exhibited perching and tick-feeding behaviours, particularly on buffalo and cattle, while Yellow-billed Oxpecker showed a stronger reliance on tick-feeding, especially on buffalo. Other feeding behaviours, such as the consumption of ear wax, mucus, and saliva, were mainly recorded on giraffe, suggesting resource diversification strategies. Host rejection and tolerance behaviours also differed among species, with buffalo and giraffe demonstrating higher tolerance levels compared to cattle and zebra, which exhibited elevated rejection responses. Oxpecker attachment patterns differed across host species and body regions. Preferred foraging regions included the back, head, and anogenital areas that are typically difficult for hosts to self-groom. These findings provide dry-season baseline data on oxpecker-host interactions in a mixed-use conservancy landscape and highlight behavioural flexibility in response to host species and tolerance. Interpretation of interspecific differences, particularly for Yellow-billed Oxpeckers, should be viewed as preliminary due to uneven sampling across hosts.

Abstract Image

牛椋鸟(Buphagus spp.)在家养和野生哺乳动物中的觅食行为和寄主反应
本文于2023年5月至9月在纳米比亚东北部的Salambala自然保护区对红嘴牛椋鸟(Buphagus erythrorhynchus)和黄嘴牛椋鸟(Buphagus africanus)的觅食行为、寄主物种利用和空间依恋偏好进行了研究。共发现1252种潜在宿主动物,包括非洲水牛(Syncerus caffer)、牛(Bos taurus)、长颈鹿(Giraffa camelopardalis)和平原斑马(Equus quagga)。记录了234只红嘴牛椋鸟和69只黄嘴牛椋鸟与宿主的相互作用。红嘴牛椋鸟主要表现出栖息和食蜱行为,特别是对水牛和牛,而黄嘴牛椋鸟表现出更强的依赖食蜱行为,特别是对水牛。其他摄食行为,如耳垢、粘液和唾液的消耗,主要记录在长颈鹿身上,提示资源多样化策略。宿主的排斥和耐受行为也因物种而异,水牛和长颈鹿的耐受水平高于牛和斑马,而牛和斑马的排斥反应较高。不同寄主种类和身体部位的啄木鸟附着模式不同。首选的觅食区域包括背部、头部和肛门生殖器区域,这些区域通常是宿主难以自我梳理的。这些发现提供了在混合使用的保护景观中,牛椋鸟与宿主相互作用的旱季基线数据,并强调了对宿主物种和耐受性的行为灵活性。对种间差异的解释,特别是对黄嘴牛椋鸟的解释,应被视为初步的,因为不同宿主的采样不均匀。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
African Journal of Ecology
African Journal of Ecology 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
10.00%
发文量
134
审稿时长
18-36 weeks
期刊介绍: African Journal of Ecology (formerly East African Wildlife Journal) publishes original scientific research into the ecology and conservation of the animals and plants of Africa. It has a wide circulation both within and outside Africa and is the foremost research journal on the ecology of the continent. In addition to original articles, the Journal publishes comprehensive reviews on topical subjects and brief communications of preliminary results.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书