A Pilot Study Exploring the Impact of Pro Re Nata Medication Utilization on Aggression in Forensic Psychiatric Patients.

Gabrielle Morgan, O Greg Deardorff, Raja Hussain, Alexandria Choate, Manfredo Flores Cruz, Roger W Sommi, Niels C Beck
{"title":"A Pilot Study Exploring the Impact of Pro Re Nata Medication Utilization on Aggression in Forensic Psychiatric Patients.","authors":"Gabrielle Morgan, O Greg Deardorff, Raja Hussain, Alexandria Choate, Manfredo Flores Cruz, Roger W Sommi, Niels C Beck","doi":"10.64719/pb.15427","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To analyze patterns of pro re nata (PRN) medication utilization during the seven-day periods preceding and following aggressive incidents in a forensic setting, including both psychotropic and somatic agents, to identify trends in use surrounding aggression.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective chart review at a long-term state forensic psychiatric facility. Patients housed on units associated with the New Outlook Program (NOP) within a six-month period who received PRN medications were included.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 106 patients evaluated, 42 were included. The mean age for study participants was 37 years old, with 83% being male. Out of 322 aggressive incidents, the overall PRN utilization rate was higher than the baseline in 38.8% of events (N = 125). For the overall seven-day period preceding and following an aggressive incident, there was no significant difference between psychotropic and somatic PRNs (β = -0.16, p = 0.74), and neither type showed a meaningful deviation from baseline (Intercept = -0.25, p = 0.46). Additionally, there was no significant difference in PRN utilization when separately assessing the seven-day period preceding or following an aggressive incident.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>No consistent group-level trends in PRN utilization were identified in relation to aggression. However, some patient-level variation was observed post-incident, suggesting individualized patterns compared to group-level trends. These findings support the clinical value of monitoring individuals' PRN utilization patterns to inform treatment planning.</p>","PeriodicalId":94351,"journal":{"name":"Psychopharmacology bulletin","volume":"56 1","pages":"92-97"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12795281/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychopharmacology bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.64719/pb.15427","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To analyze patterns of pro re nata (PRN) medication utilization during the seven-day periods preceding and following aggressive incidents in a forensic setting, including both psychotropic and somatic agents, to identify trends in use surrounding aggression.

Methods: This was a retrospective chart review at a long-term state forensic psychiatric facility. Patients housed on units associated with the New Outlook Program (NOP) within a six-month period who received PRN medications were included.

Results: Out of 106 patients evaluated, 42 were included. The mean age for study participants was 37 years old, with 83% being male. Out of 322 aggressive incidents, the overall PRN utilization rate was higher than the baseline in 38.8% of events (N = 125). For the overall seven-day period preceding and following an aggressive incident, there was no significant difference between psychotropic and somatic PRNs (β = -0.16, p = 0.74), and neither type showed a meaningful deviation from baseline (Intercept = -0.25, p = 0.46). Additionally, there was no significant difference in PRN utilization when separately assessing the seven-day period preceding or following an aggressive incident.

Conclusion: No consistent group-level trends in PRN utilization were identified in relation to aggression. However, some patient-level variation was observed post-incident, suggesting individualized patterns compared to group-level trends. These findings support the clinical value of monitoring individuals' PRN utilization patterns to inform treatment planning.

法医精神科患者使用自然药物对攻击行为影响的初步研究。
目的:分析法医环境中攻击事件发生前后7天内的PRN药物使用模式,包括精神药物和躯体药物,以确定周围攻击的使用趋势。方法:这是一个回顾性的图表回顾长期国家法医精神病院。在6个月内接受PRN药物治疗的与新前景计划(NOP)相关的单位的患者包括在内。结果:106例患者中,42例纳入评估。研究参与者的平均年龄为37岁,其中83%为男性。在322例侵袭性事件中,38.8%的事件(N = 125)总体PRN利用率高于基线。对于攻击事件前后的整个7天期间,精神药物和躯体prn之间没有显著差异(β = -0.16, p = 0.74),两种类型均未显示出与基线有显著偏差(Intercept = -0.25, p = 0.46)。此外,当单独评估攻击事件前后的7天期间时,PRN的使用没有显着差异。结论:PRN的使用在群体水平上与攻击行为没有一致的趋势。然而,在事件发生后,观察到一些患者水平的变化,表明与群体水平的趋势相比,个性化的模式。这些发现支持了监测个体PRN使用模式以告知治疗计划的临床价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书