Rethinking Achievement: Optimal Dose of Supervised Exercise Sessions for a Cardiac Fitness and Rehabilitation Program for Pediatric Congenital Heart Disease Patients.

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Tracy Curran, Katherine Hansen, Lindsey Reynolds, Keri Shafer, Kimberlee Gauvreau, Naomi Gauthier
{"title":"Rethinking Achievement: Optimal Dose of Supervised Exercise Sessions for a Cardiac Fitness and Rehabilitation Program for Pediatric Congenital Heart Disease Patients.","authors":"Tracy Curran, Katherine Hansen, Lindsey Reynolds, Keri Shafer, Kimberlee Gauvreau, Naomi Gauthier","doi":"10.1097/HCR.0000000000000992","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Pediatric cardiac fitness and rehabilitation for patients with congenital heart disease is an emerging yet underdeveloped field. Adult cardiac rehabilitation programs prescribe 36 sessions, but there are no data regarding the ideal number for a pediatric cardiac fitness program (CFP). This study explored whether there was an optimal range of fitness sessions associated with significant gains following a CFP.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Pediatric CFP data from January 2017 to December 2022 were analyzed. Number of supervised fitness sessions were categorized into 4 groups (6-11, 12-18, 19-24, and 25-40 sessions) and also analyzed as a continuous variable. Cardiorespiratory fitness, strength, flexibility, and mindset outcome metrics were compared using 1-way analysis of covariance and linear regression, adjusting for baseline values.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 62 patients, with median age of 15.5 years (range: 8-21, 50% female), participated in a median of 19 fitness sessions (range: 6-40). Baseline characteristics, congenital heart disease classification, hemodynamic level, and number of sessions/weeks across the 4 groups were similar. Patients improved from pre- to post-CFP in cardiorespiratory fitness, strength, flexibility, and mindset metrics, but no significant differences were found between any of the ranges of sessions or numbers of sessions as a continuous variable. Power was limited due to small sample sizes per group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Fitness improvements were seen with fewer than 36 sessions, but an optimal dose for a complete program remains unclear. Rethinking program completion as achieving goals rather than a specified number of sessions should be considered. Individualized, personal dosing may yield the most efficient use of patient time and health care resources.</p>","PeriodicalId":15192,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiopulmonary Rehabilitation and Prevention","volume":" ","pages":"140-147"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cardiopulmonary Rehabilitation and Prevention","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/HCR.0000000000000992","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Pediatric cardiac fitness and rehabilitation for patients with congenital heart disease is an emerging yet underdeveloped field. Adult cardiac rehabilitation programs prescribe 36 sessions, but there are no data regarding the ideal number for a pediatric cardiac fitness program (CFP). This study explored whether there was an optimal range of fitness sessions associated with significant gains following a CFP.

Methods: Pediatric CFP data from January 2017 to December 2022 were analyzed. Number of supervised fitness sessions were categorized into 4 groups (6-11, 12-18, 19-24, and 25-40 sessions) and also analyzed as a continuous variable. Cardiorespiratory fitness, strength, flexibility, and mindset outcome metrics were compared using 1-way analysis of covariance and linear regression, adjusting for baseline values.

Results: A total of 62 patients, with median age of 15.5 years (range: 8-21, 50% female), participated in a median of 19 fitness sessions (range: 6-40). Baseline characteristics, congenital heart disease classification, hemodynamic level, and number of sessions/weeks across the 4 groups were similar. Patients improved from pre- to post-CFP in cardiorespiratory fitness, strength, flexibility, and mindset metrics, but no significant differences were found between any of the ranges of sessions or numbers of sessions as a continuous variable. Power was limited due to small sample sizes per group.

Conclusions: Fitness improvements were seen with fewer than 36 sessions, but an optimal dose for a complete program remains unclear. Rethinking program completion as achieving goals rather than a specified number of sessions should be considered. Individualized, personal dosing may yield the most efficient use of patient time and health care resources.

反思成就:儿童先天性心脏病患者心脏健康和康复计划的最佳监督运动剂量。
目的:先天性心脏病儿童心脏健康与康复是一个新兴但不发达的领域。成人心脏康复计划规定36个疗程,但没有关于儿童心脏健身计划(CFP)的理想数字的数据。这项研究探讨了CFP后是否存在与显著收益相关的最佳健身时段范围。方法:分析2017年1月至2022年12月儿科CFP数据。有监督的健身次数被分为4组(6-11次、12-18次、19-24次和25-40次),并作为连续变量进行分析。采用单因素协方差分析和线性回归对心肺健康、力量、柔韧性和心态结局指标进行比较,并对基线值进行调整。结果:共62例患者,平均年龄15.5岁(范围8-21岁,女性占50%),平均参加了19次健身(范围6-40)。4组的基线特征、先天性心脏病分类、血流动力学水平和疗程/周数相似。从cfp前到cfp后,患者在心肺健康、力量、柔韧性和心态指标方面均有所改善,但在任何疗程范围或疗程数量之间均未发现显著差异。由于每组样本量小,功率有限。结论:少于36次的训练可以改善健康,但完整训练的最佳剂量仍不清楚。应该考虑将课程完成重新考虑为实现目标,而不是指定的课程数量。个体化、个体化给药可以最有效地利用病人的时间和卫生保健资源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
34.20%
发文量
164
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: JCRP was the first, and remains the only, professional journal dedicated to improving multidisciplinary clinical practice and expanding research evidence specific to both cardiovascular and pulmonary rehabilitation. This includes exercise testing and prescription, behavioral medicine, and cardiopulmonary risk factor management. In 2007, JCRP expanded its scope to include primary prevention of cardiovascular and pulmonary diseases. JCRP publishes scientific and clinical peer-reviewed Original Investigations, Reviews, and Brief or Case Reports focused on the causes, prevention, and treatment of individuals with cardiovascular or pulmonary diseases in both a print and online-only format. Editorial features include Editorials, Invited Commentaries, Literature Updates, and Clinically-relevant Topical Updates. JCRP is the official Journal of the American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation and the Canadian Association of Cardiac Rehabilitation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书