Do people with preoperative mental health diagnoses experience poorer pain and functional outcomes after total knee replacement? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
Clinical Rehabilitation Pub Date : 2026-05-01 Epub Date: 2026-01-13 DOI:10.1177/02692155251411902
Saurabh P Mehta, Craig A Wassinger, Mostafa Zahed, Emily W Blevins, Summer B Calloway, Joshua Bunner, Lauren E Johnson, Montana Riddle, Victoria Kailand Moaf
{"title":"Do people with preoperative mental health diagnoses experience poorer pain and functional outcomes after total knee replacement? A systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Saurabh P Mehta, Craig A Wassinger, Mostafa Zahed, Emily W Blevins, Summer B Calloway, Joshua Bunner, Lauren E Johnson, Montana Riddle, Victoria Kailand Moaf","doi":"10.1177/02692155251411902","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ObjectiveThis systematic review explored whether individuals with preoperative mental health diagnoses undergoing total knee replacement experience worse outcomes compared to patients without such diagnoses.Data SourcesMEDLINE, CINAHL, PSYCINFO, SPORT Discus, and PEDro databases were searched from inception to October 2025 to identify relevant articles.Review MethodsTwo independent reviewers screened and extracted data from relevant studies. The risk of bias for each study was assessed using the Quality in Prognostic Studies Tool. Meta-analysis using the standardized mean differences was employed to analyse associations between preoperative mental health diagnoses and pain and function at six months and ≥one year after total knee replacement. Certainty of evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation tool.ResultsThe literature search yielded 53 articles eligible for the review, of which 13 were rated as low risk of bias. Preoperative mental health diagnoses were not associated with worse pain at six months (standardized mean differences = -0.68, <i>P</i>  =  .21) or ≥ one year (standardized mean differences = -0.48, <i>P</i> = .08) post-total knee replacement. Similarly, preoperative mental health diagnoses were also not associated with functional outcomes at six months (standardized mean differences = -0.34, <i>P</i> = .07) or ≥one year (standardized mean differences = -0.56, <i>P</i> = .32). Considerable heterogeneity and imprecise estimates limited the certainty of these findings.ConclusionFindings suggest that preoperative mental health conditions alone may not predict poor pain and function outcomes post-total knee replacement. Given the heterogeneity and low certainty of evidence, further research should explore associations between mental health and other risk factors to guide personalized preoperative interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":10441,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"647-662"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02692155251411902","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ObjectiveThis systematic review explored whether individuals with preoperative mental health diagnoses undergoing total knee replacement experience worse outcomes compared to patients without such diagnoses.Data SourcesMEDLINE, CINAHL, PSYCINFO, SPORT Discus, and PEDro databases were searched from inception to October 2025 to identify relevant articles.Review MethodsTwo independent reviewers screened and extracted data from relevant studies. The risk of bias for each study was assessed using the Quality in Prognostic Studies Tool. Meta-analysis using the standardized mean differences was employed to analyse associations between preoperative mental health diagnoses and pain and function at six months and ≥one year after total knee replacement. Certainty of evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation tool.ResultsThe literature search yielded 53 articles eligible for the review, of which 13 were rated as low risk of bias. Preoperative mental health diagnoses were not associated with worse pain at six months (standardized mean differences = -0.68, P  =  .21) or ≥ one year (standardized mean differences = -0.48, P = .08) post-total knee replacement. Similarly, preoperative mental health diagnoses were also not associated with functional outcomes at six months (standardized mean differences = -0.34, P = .07) or ≥one year (standardized mean differences = -0.56, P = .32). Considerable heterogeneity and imprecise estimates limited the certainty of these findings.ConclusionFindings suggest that preoperative mental health conditions alone may not predict poor pain and function outcomes post-total knee replacement. Given the heterogeneity and low certainty of evidence, further research should explore associations between mental health and other risk factors to guide personalized preoperative interventions.

术前有心理健康诊断的患者在全膝关节置换术后疼痛和功能预后较差吗?系统回顾和荟萃分析。
目的:本系统综述探讨术前有心理健康诊断的患者行全膝关节置换术的预后是否比无心理健康诊断的患者差。数据来源检索medline、CINAHL、PSYCINFO、SPORT Discus和PEDro数据库,从创建到2025年10月检索相关文章。两名独立的审稿人筛选并提取相关研究的数据。使用预后研究质量工具评估每项研究的偏倚风险。采用标准化平均差异进行meta分析,分析术前心理健康诊断与全膝关节置换术后6个月和≥1年疼痛和功能之间的关系。使用建议分级评估、发展和评估工具评估证据的确定性。结果文献检索得到53篇符合评价条件的文献,其中13篇被评为低偏倚风险。术前心理健康诊断与6个月时疼痛加重无关(标准化平均差异= -0.68,P =。21)或≥1年(标准化平均差异= -0.48,P =。08)全膝关节置换术后。同样,术前心理健康诊断也与6个月时的功能结局无关(标准化平均差异= -0.34,P =)。07)或≥1年(标准化平均差异= -0.56,P = 0.32)。相当大的异质性和不精确的估计限制了这些发现的确定性。结论术前心理健康状况不能预测全膝关节置换术后疼痛和功能不良的预后。鉴于证据的异质性和低确定性,进一步的研究应探讨心理健康与其他危险因素之间的关系,以指导个性化的术前干预。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Rehabilitation
Clinical Rehabilitation 医学-康复医学
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
6.70%
发文量
117
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Rehabilitation covering the whole field of disability and rehabilitation, this peer-reviewed journal publishes research and discussion articles and acts as a forum for the international dissemination and exchange of information amongst the large number of professionals involved in rehabilitation. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书