Learning Through Unhoming. Extended Squatting Time and Agentic Homemaking After Squatting in Rome

IF 0.5 Q3 ANTHROPOLOGY
City & Society Pub Date : 2026-01-10 DOI:10.1111/ciso.70023
Chiara Cacciotti
{"title":"Learning Through Unhoming. Extended Squatting Time and Agentic Homemaking After Squatting in Rome","authors":"Chiara Cacciotti","doi":"10.1111/ciso.70023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>The article examines the lasting effects of squatting in Rome by tracing how its political and pedagogical legacies persist long after eviction. While the physical removal of individuals from a space is often considered the defining moment of eviction, it is, in reality, only the culmination of a lengthy and complex social and legal process—one whose consequences continue to unfold far beyond the moment of displacement. Although squatting is often understood as politically transformative, little attention has been paid to the forms of agency it cultivates and how these endure after unhoming. Drawing on feminist and anthropological approaches, the article introduces agentic homemaking as a relational practice shaped through collective dwelling and shared political struggle. Through the life stories of two former squatters, it shows how people confront unhoming by mobilizing care, mutual aid, and learned knowledge to resist structural inequalities and rebuild their lives. The article also advances the concept of extended squatting time to highlight the enduring influence of squatting as a lived pedagogy that produces marginalized forms of knowledge central to urban politics and everyday survival. Together, these concepts foreground overlooked forms of agency that emerge in the aftermath of dispossession, offering new perspectives on urban struggle, relational resilience, and future-making.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":46417,"journal":{"name":"City & Society","volume":"38 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"City & Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://anthrosource.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ciso.70023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article examines the lasting effects of squatting in Rome by tracing how its political and pedagogical legacies persist long after eviction. While the physical removal of individuals from a space is often considered the defining moment of eviction, it is, in reality, only the culmination of a lengthy and complex social and legal process—one whose consequences continue to unfold far beyond the moment of displacement. Although squatting is often understood as politically transformative, little attention has been paid to the forms of agency it cultivates and how these endure after unhoming. Drawing on feminist and anthropological approaches, the article introduces agentic homemaking as a relational practice shaped through collective dwelling and shared political struggle. Through the life stories of two former squatters, it shows how people confront unhoming by mobilizing care, mutual aid, and learned knowledge to resist structural inequalities and rebuild their lives. The article also advances the concept of extended squatting time to highlight the enduring influence of squatting as a lived pedagogy that produces marginalized forms of knowledge central to urban politics and everyday survival. Together, these concepts foreground overlooked forms of agency that emerge in the aftermath of dispossession, offering new perspectives on urban struggle, relational resilience, and future-making.

通过不归路学习。罗马人蹲地时间的延长和蹲地后的自主家政
这篇文章通过追踪其政治和教育遗产如何在驱逐之后持续很长一段时间来研究罗马蹲地的持久影响。虽然将个人从空间中实际移除通常被认为是驱逐的决定性时刻,但实际上,这只是一个漫长而复杂的社会和法律过程的高潮,其后果远远超出了流离失所的时刻。尽管人们通常认为“蹲地”在政治上具有变革意义,但很少有人关注它所培养的代理形式,以及这些代理在离开家园后如何持续下去。本文借鉴女权主义和人类学的方法,介绍了代理家政作为一种通过集体居住和共同政治斗争形成的关系实践。通过两位前棚户区居民的生活故事,它展示了人们如何通过动员关怀、互助和学到的知识来抵制结构性不平等并重建他们的生活。文章还提出了延长蹲坐时间的概念,以强调蹲坐作为一种生活教学法的持久影响,它产生了对城市政治和日常生存至关重要的边缘化知识形式。总之,这些概念突出了在剥夺之后出现的被忽视的代理形式,为城市斗争、关系弹性和未来制定提供了新的视角。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
City & Society
City & Society ANTHROPOLOGY-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
期刊介绍: City & Society, the journal of the Society for Urban, National and Transnational/Global Anthropology, is intended to foster debate and conceptual development in urban, national, and transnational anthropology, particularly in their interrelationships. It seeks to promote communication with related disciplines of interest to members of SUNTA and to develop theory from a comparative perspective.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书