Resource allocation to engagement teams: Evidence from asset-backed securitization assurance services

IF 8 3区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS, FINANCE
British Accounting Review Pub Date : 2026-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-29 DOI:10.1016/j.bar.2025.101677
Ran An , Jiayan Gao , Shan Li , Yanyan Wang , Lisheng Yu
{"title":"Resource allocation to engagement teams: Evidence from asset-backed securitization assurance services","authors":"Ran An ,&nbsp;Jiayan Gao ,&nbsp;Shan Li ,&nbsp;Yanyan Wang ,&nbsp;Lisheng Yu","doi":"10.1016/j.bar.2025.101677","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Human resource allocation to engagement teams is the key determinant of the efficiency and quality of assurance production. Employing a unique setting of bank-originated asset-backed securitization (ABS) assurances in China and hand-collected data on ABS assurance teams, we examine resource allocation at the team level among accounting firms that provide both ABS assurance services and financial statement audits to the same client bank, which we term “joint-provision accounting firms.” We find that, compared with accounting firms that provide ABS assurance services only, joint-provision firms allocate more auditors to their ABS assurance teams, but these auditors generally have less expertise. We further find that banks audited by joint-provision accounting firms tend to receive higher-quality financial statement audits. Additional analysis indicates that the workload of financial statement auditors and the banking specialization of accounting firms have moderating effects on the association between joint provision and team size (but not team expertise). These results broaden the understanding of dynamics of engagement teams and highlight the implication of resource allocation to other assurance services for financial audit quality.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47996,"journal":{"name":"British Accounting Review","volume":"58 1","pages":"Article 101677"},"PeriodicalIF":8.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Accounting Review","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0890838925001271","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Human resource allocation to engagement teams is the key determinant of the efficiency and quality of assurance production. Employing a unique setting of bank-originated asset-backed securitization (ABS) assurances in China and hand-collected data on ABS assurance teams, we examine resource allocation at the team level among accounting firms that provide both ABS assurance services and financial statement audits to the same client bank, which we term “joint-provision accounting firms.” We find that, compared with accounting firms that provide ABS assurance services only, joint-provision firms allocate more auditors to their ABS assurance teams, but these auditors generally have less expertise. We further find that banks audited by joint-provision accounting firms tend to receive higher-quality financial statement audits. Additional analysis indicates that the workload of financial statement auditors and the banking specialization of accounting firms have moderating effects on the association between joint provision and team size (but not team expertise). These results broaden the understanding of dynamics of engagement teams and highlight the implication of resource allocation to other assurance services for financial audit quality.
对业务团队的资源配置:来自资产支持证券化保证服务的证据
人力资源分配给业务团队是保证生产效率和质量的关键决定因素。采用中国独特的银行发起的资产支持证券化(ABS)担保设置和手工收集的ABS担保团队数据,我们研究了在团队层面上为同一家客户银行提供ABS担保服务和财务报表审计的会计师事务所(我们称之为“联备会计师事务所”)之间的资源配置。我们发现,与只提供ABS保证服务的会计师事务所相比,联备公司为其ABS保证团队分配了更多的审计师,但这些审计师通常缺乏专业知识。我们进一步发现,由联备会计师事务所审计的银行往往得到更高质量的财务报表审计。进一步的分析表明,财务报表审计师的工作量和会计师事务所的银行专业化对联合准备金和团队规模之间的关联有调节作用(但对团队专业知识没有调节作用)。这些结果扩大了对审计项目组动态的理解,并突出了资源分配给其他鉴证服务对财务审计质量的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
British Accounting Review
British Accounting Review BUSINESS, FINANCE-
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
3.90%
发文量
39
审稿时长
76 days
期刊介绍: The British Accounting Review*is pleased to publish original scholarly papers across the whole spectrum of accounting and finance. The journal is eclectic and pluralistic and contributions are welcomed across a wide range of research methodologies (e.g. analytical, archival, experimental, survey and qualitative case methods) and topics (e.g. financial accounting, management accounting, finance and financial management, auditing, public sector accounting, social and environmental accounting; accounting education and accounting history), evidence from UK and non-UK sources are equally acceptable.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书