Ran An , Jiayan Gao , Shan Li , Yanyan Wang , Lisheng Yu
{"title":"Resource allocation to engagement teams: Evidence from asset-backed securitization assurance services","authors":"Ran An , Jiayan Gao , Shan Li , Yanyan Wang , Lisheng Yu","doi":"10.1016/j.bar.2025.101677","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Human resource allocation to engagement teams is the key determinant of the efficiency and quality of assurance production. Employing a unique setting of bank-originated asset-backed securitization (ABS) assurances in China and hand-collected data on ABS assurance teams, we examine resource allocation at the team level among accounting firms that provide both ABS assurance services and financial statement audits to the same client bank, which we term “joint-provision accounting firms.” We find that, compared with accounting firms that provide ABS assurance services only, joint-provision firms allocate more auditors to their ABS assurance teams, but these auditors generally have less expertise. We further find that banks audited by joint-provision accounting firms tend to receive higher-quality financial statement audits. Additional analysis indicates that the workload of financial statement auditors and the banking specialization of accounting firms have moderating effects on the association between joint provision and team size (but not team expertise). These results broaden the understanding of dynamics of engagement teams and highlight the implication of resource allocation to other assurance services for financial audit quality.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47996,"journal":{"name":"British Accounting Review","volume":"58 1","pages":"Article 101677"},"PeriodicalIF":8.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Accounting Review","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0890838925001271","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Human resource allocation to engagement teams is the key determinant of the efficiency and quality of assurance production. Employing a unique setting of bank-originated asset-backed securitization (ABS) assurances in China and hand-collected data on ABS assurance teams, we examine resource allocation at the team level among accounting firms that provide both ABS assurance services and financial statement audits to the same client bank, which we term “joint-provision accounting firms.” We find that, compared with accounting firms that provide ABS assurance services only, joint-provision firms allocate more auditors to their ABS assurance teams, but these auditors generally have less expertise. We further find that banks audited by joint-provision accounting firms tend to receive higher-quality financial statement audits. Additional analysis indicates that the workload of financial statement auditors and the banking specialization of accounting firms have moderating effects on the association between joint provision and team size (but not team expertise). These results broaden the understanding of dynamics of engagement teams and highlight the implication of resource allocation to other assurance services for financial audit quality.
期刊介绍:
The British Accounting Review*is pleased to publish original scholarly papers across the whole spectrum of accounting and finance. The journal is eclectic and pluralistic and contributions are welcomed across a wide range of research methodologies (e.g. analytical, archival, experimental, survey and qualitative case methods) and topics (e.g. financial accounting, management accounting, finance and financial management, auditing, public sector accounting, social and environmental accounting; accounting education and accounting history), evidence from UK and non-UK sources are equally acceptable.