Who should lead the decarbonization transition? Leadership and shared responsibility in decarbonization supply chains

IF 10.6 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL
Qingyu Liu , Bin Shen , Ciwei Dong , Dong Yang
{"title":"Who should lead the decarbonization transition? Leadership and shared responsibility in decarbonization supply chains","authors":"Qingyu Liu ,&nbsp;Bin Shen ,&nbsp;Ciwei Dong ,&nbsp;Dong Yang","doi":"10.1016/j.ijpe.2026.109911","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Growing concerns over global climate change, net-zero targets and the urgency to fulfill Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) have intensified the need for effective decarbonization strategies. Collaborative efforts among manufacturers and retailers can accelerate the transition from high-carbon products (HCPs) to decarbonization products (DCPs). This paper analyzes a two-period supply chain with two leadership strategies for guiding the decarbonization level: the manufacturer-led decarbonization (M-DCPs) strategy and the retailer-led decarbonization (R-DCPs) strategy. Supported by a shared responsibility mechanism, these strategies influence both the supply chain's long-term profitability and its overall emission reductions. Our findings show that when either firm adopts a long-term perspective and assumes the leadership role in the decarbonization level, the leader can enhance its own profitability. In contrast, focusing on a short-term perspective may cause firms to bypass the decarbonization transition, suggesting that such a transition does not necessarily offer immediate profitability. Moreover, we find that although DCPs may exhibit a lower second-period price and demand after the decarbonization transition relative to the pre-transition period, from a profitability perspective, the M-DCPs strategy yields higher overall profitability for the supply chain; while from an environmental perspective, the R-DCPs strategy achieves more emission reductions. Notably, only the M-DCPs strategy achieves a Pareto improvement while this outcome cannot achieve under the R-DCPs strategy. Our findings emphasize the need for a forward-looking commitment to decarbonization, supported by an effective shared responsibility mechanism, to advance environmental goals, enhance supply chain profitability and guide industry professionals in fostering collective decarbonization transitions in multi-period contexts.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":14287,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Production Economics","volume":"292 ","pages":"Article 109911"},"PeriodicalIF":10.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Production Economics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925527326000022","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Growing concerns over global climate change, net-zero targets and the urgency to fulfill Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) have intensified the need for effective decarbonization strategies. Collaborative efforts among manufacturers and retailers can accelerate the transition from high-carbon products (HCPs) to decarbonization products (DCPs). This paper analyzes a two-period supply chain with two leadership strategies for guiding the decarbonization level: the manufacturer-led decarbonization (M-DCPs) strategy and the retailer-led decarbonization (R-DCPs) strategy. Supported by a shared responsibility mechanism, these strategies influence both the supply chain's long-term profitability and its overall emission reductions. Our findings show that when either firm adopts a long-term perspective and assumes the leadership role in the decarbonization level, the leader can enhance its own profitability. In contrast, focusing on a short-term perspective may cause firms to bypass the decarbonization transition, suggesting that such a transition does not necessarily offer immediate profitability. Moreover, we find that although DCPs may exhibit a lower second-period price and demand after the decarbonization transition relative to the pre-transition period, from a profitability perspective, the M-DCPs strategy yields higher overall profitability for the supply chain; while from an environmental perspective, the R-DCPs strategy achieves more emission reductions. Notably, only the M-DCPs strategy achieves a Pareto improvement while this outcome cannot achieve under the R-DCPs strategy. Our findings emphasize the need for a forward-looking commitment to decarbonization, supported by an effective shared responsibility mechanism, to advance environmental goals, enhance supply chain profitability and guide industry professionals in fostering collective decarbonization transitions in multi-period contexts.
谁应该领导脱碳转型?在脱碳供应链中发挥领导作用并分担责任
对全球气候变化、净零排放目标以及实现可持续发展目标的紧迫性的日益关注,加剧了对有效脱碳战略的需求。制造商和零售商之间的合作可以加速从高碳产品(HCPs)向脱碳产品(dcp)的过渡。本文分析了两期供应链的两种领导策略:制造商主导的脱碳(m - dcp)战略和零售商主导的脱碳(r- dcp)战略。在共同责任机制的支持下,这些战略既影响供应链的长期盈利能力,也影响供应链的总体减排。我们的研究结果表明,当任何一家企业采用长期视角并在脱碳层面担任领导角色时,领导者都可以提高自身的盈利能力。相比之下,关注短期前景可能会导致企业绕过脱碳转型,这表明这种转型不一定能立即带来盈利。此外,我们发现,尽管dcp在脱碳转型后的第二阶段价格和需求可能低于转型前,但从盈利能力的角度来看,m - dcp战略为供应链带来了更高的整体盈利能力;而从环境角度来看,r - dcp战略实现了更多的减排。值得注意的是,只有m - dcp策略实现了帕累托改进,而r - dcp策略无法实现这一结果。我们的研究结果强调,需要在有效的共同责任机制的支持下,对脱碳做出前瞻性承诺,以推进环境目标,提高供应链盈利能力,并指导行业专业人士在多时期背景下促进集体脱碳转型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Production Economics
International Journal of Production Economics 管理科学-工程:工业
CiteScore
21.40
自引率
7.50%
发文量
266
审稿时长
52 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Production Economics focuses on the interface between engineering and management. It covers all aspects of manufacturing and process industries, as well as production in general. The journal is interdisciplinary, considering activities throughout the product life cycle and material flow cycle. It aims to disseminate knowledge for improving industrial practice and strengthening the theoretical base for decision making. The journal serves as a forum for exchanging ideas and presenting new developments in theory and application, combining academic standards with practical value for industrial applications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书