{"title":"Value-based or one-time? Optimal pricing modes for generative AI services in e-commerce platforms","authors":"Yu Ning , Zexuan Shi , Yang Tong","doi":"10.1016/j.ijpe.2025.109828","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>With the rapid advancement of generative artificial intelligence (GAI) technology, e-commerce platforms are increasingly integrating GAI services to enhance product design, manufacturing, and sales processes. Despite this trend, the extant literature lacks systematic investigation into platform pricing for such services, particularly in choosing between a one-time fixed fee mode (a fixed fee for adopting GAI services) and a value-based commission mode (a fixed fee plus a commission on sales above a threshold). To address this gap, this study develops a novel two-part tariff contract to optimize the pricing mode for GAI services. Incorporating factors such as platform investment in GAI, investment cost coefficient, commission rate, and sales quantity threshold, our game-theoretic analysis reveals nuanced insights. Interestingly, our findings reveal that a value-based commission mode may not always align with the platform's interest. As the investment cost coefficient increases, the platform tends to favor a one-time fixed fee mode. Moreover, under the value-based commission mode, a higher sales quantity threshold does not necessarily benefit the manufacturer. We also identify a win-win region in which the value-based commission mode benefits both the platform and the manufacturer. Finally, additional analyses extend our findings to scenarios involving enhanced GAI efficiency and competitive market settings. This research advances the literature on AI pricing and two-part tariff theory, while offering practical insights for platform operators and manufacturers.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":14287,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Production Economics","volume":"292 ","pages":"Article 109828"},"PeriodicalIF":10.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Production Economics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925527325003135","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
With the rapid advancement of generative artificial intelligence (GAI) technology, e-commerce platforms are increasingly integrating GAI services to enhance product design, manufacturing, and sales processes. Despite this trend, the extant literature lacks systematic investigation into platform pricing for such services, particularly in choosing between a one-time fixed fee mode (a fixed fee for adopting GAI services) and a value-based commission mode (a fixed fee plus a commission on sales above a threshold). To address this gap, this study develops a novel two-part tariff contract to optimize the pricing mode for GAI services. Incorporating factors such as platform investment in GAI, investment cost coefficient, commission rate, and sales quantity threshold, our game-theoretic analysis reveals nuanced insights. Interestingly, our findings reveal that a value-based commission mode may not always align with the platform's interest. As the investment cost coefficient increases, the platform tends to favor a one-time fixed fee mode. Moreover, under the value-based commission mode, a higher sales quantity threshold does not necessarily benefit the manufacturer. We also identify a win-win region in which the value-based commission mode benefits both the platform and the manufacturer. Finally, additional analyses extend our findings to scenarios involving enhanced GAI efficiency and competitive market settings. This research advances the literature on AI pricing and two-part tariff theory, while offering practical insights for platform operators and manufacturers.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Production Economics focuses on the interface between engineering and management. It covers all aspects of manufacturing and process industries, as well as production in general. The journal is interdisciplinary, considering activities throughout the product life cycle and material flow cycle. It aims to disseminate knowledge for improving industrial practice and strengthening the theoretical base for decision making. The journal serves as a forum for exchanging ideas and presenting new developments in theory and application, combining academic standards with practical value for industrial applications.