The effect of big data-driven tax enforcement on audit pricing: Evidence from China

IF 8 3区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS, FINANCE
British Accounting Review Pub Date : 2026-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-28 DOI:10.1016/j.bar.2024.101531
Xiting Wu , Sammy Xiaoyan Ying , Jiaxing You , Xiaochun Wu , Huiying Wu
{"title":"The effect of big data-driven tax enforcement on audit pricing: Evidence from China","authors":"Xiting Wu ,&nbsp;Sammy Xiaoyan Ying ,&nbsp;Jiaxing You ,&nbsp;Xiaochun Wu ,&nbsp;Huiying Wu","doi":"10.1016/j.bar.2024.101531","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Over the past few decades, the Chinese government has implemented a series of tax<span><span> system reforms, namely, the Golden Tax Project (GTP), to use information technology to enhance tax<span><span> administration. Taking advantage of the staggered implementation of phase III of the GTP from 2013 to 2016, we use a difference-in-differences design to examine whether strengthened tax enforcement impacts audit pricing. Using a sample of 2751 companies listed on Chinese stock exchanges from 2007 to 2016, we test and find support for our hypothesis that the implementation of GTP III leads to a reduction in </span>audit fees. We predict that GTP III decreases audit risks by improving </span></span>corporate tax<span> compliance and information transparency, which in turn reduces audit fees. Consistent with our prediction, the results show that the implementation of GTP III is associated with improved tax compliance (proxied by reduced tax avoidance and negative tax-related media coverage) and with improved information transparency (measured by reduced earnings management and analyst forecast errors). Our further analyses show that the effect of GTP III on audit pricing is more pronounced for companies in regions with higher fiscal pressure, worse tax compliance environment, and more severe corruption<span>. Furthermore, the effect is strengthened when auditors are from a Big 4 firm, have more experience, and have experience in the high-tech industries. Moreover, business complexity, industry competition, and business uncertainty attenuate the effect of GTP III on audit pricing. Overall, this study suggests that tax enforcement has an important impact on auditor behavior, with benefits extending beyond enhanced tax compliance.</span></span></span></div></div>","PeriodicalId":47996,"journal":{"name":"British Accounting Review","volume":"58 1","pages":"Article 101531"},"PeriodicalIF":8.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Accounting Review","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0890838924003111","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Over the past few decades, the Chinese government has implemented a series of tax system reforms, namely, the Golden Tax Project (GTP), to use information technology to enhance tax administration. Taking advantage of the staggered implementation of phase III of the GTP from 2013 to 2016, we use a difference-in-differences design to examine whether strengthened tax enforcement impacts audit pricing. Using a sample of 2751 companies listed on Chinese stock exchanges from 2007 to 2016, we test and find support for our hypothesis that the implementation of GTP III leads to a reduction in audit fees. We predict that GTP III decreases audit risks by improving corporate tax compliance and information transparency, which in turn reduces audit fees. Consistent with our prediction, the results show that the implementation of GTP III is associated with improved tax compliance (proxied by reduced tax avoidance and negative tax-related media coverage) and with improved information transparency (measured by reduced earnings management and analyst forecast errors). Our further analyses show that the effect of GTP III on audit pricing is more pronounced for companies in regions with higher fiscal pressure, worse tax compliance environment, and more severe corruption. Furthermore, the effect is strengthened when auditors are from a Big 4 firm, have more experience, and have experience in the high-tech industries. Moreover, business complexity, industry competition, and business uncertainty attenuate the effect of GTP III on audit pricing. Overall, this study suggests that tax enforcement has an important impact on auditor behavior, with benefits extending beyond enhanced tax compliance.
大数据驱动的税务执法对审计定价的影响:来自中国的证据
在过去的几十年里,中国政府实施了一系列税收制度改革,即“金税工程”(GTP),利用信息技术加强税收管理。利用2013年至2016年GTP第三阶段的交错实施,我们采用差异中的差异设计来检验加强税收执法是否会影响审计定价。我们以2007年至2016年在中国证券交易所上市的2751家公司为样本,对GTP III的实施导致审计费用减少的假设进行了检验并找到了支持。我们预测,GTP III通过提高企业税收合规性和信息透明度来降低审计风险,从而降低审计费用。与我们的预测一致,结果表明GTP III的实施与提高税收合规性(通过减少避税和与税收相关的负面媒体报道)和提高信息透明度(通过减少盈余管理和分析师预测误差来衡量)有关。进一步分析表明,在财政压力较大、税务合规环境较差、腐败现象较严重的地区,GTP III对审计定价的影响更为明显。此外,如果审计师来自四大会计师事务所,经验更丰富,并且在高科技行业有经验,则效果会增强。此外,业务复杂性、行业竞争和业务不确定性减弱了GTP III对审计定价的影响。总体而言,本研究表明,税收执法对审计师行为有重要影响,其好处不仅限于提高税收合规性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
British Accounting Review
British Accounting Review BUSINESS, FINANCE-
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
3.90%
发文量
39
审稿时长
76 days
期刊介绍: The British Accounting Review*is pleased to publish original scholarly papers across the whole spectrum of accounting and finance. The journal is eclectic and pluralistic and contributions are welcomed across a wide range of research methodologies (e.g. analytical, archival, experimental, survey and qualitative case methods) and topics (e.g. financial accounting, management accounting, finance and financial management, auditing, public sector accounting, social and environmental accounting; accounting education and accounting history), evidence from UK and non-UK sources are equally acceptable.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书