Identifying Bots Through LLM-Generated Text in Open Narrative Responses: A Proof-of-Concept Study

IF 4.3 2区 社会学 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS
Joshua Claassen, Jan Karem Höhne, Ruben Bach, Anna-Carolina Haensch
{"title":"Identifying Bots Through LLM-Generated Text in Open Narrative Responses: A Proof-of-Concept Study","authors":"Joshua Claassen, Jan Karem Höhne, Ruben Bach, Anna-Carolina Haensch","doi":"10.1177/08944393251408022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Online survey participants are frequently recruited through social media platforms, opt-in online access panels, and river sampling approaches. Such online surveys are threatened by bots that shift survey outcomes and exploit incentives. In this proof-of-concept study, we advance the identification of bots driven by Large Language Models (LLMs) through the prediction of LLM-generated text in open narrative responses. We conducted an online survey on same-gender partnerships, including three open narrative questions, and recruited 1512 participants through Facebook. In addition, we utilized two LLM-driven bots, each of which responded to the open narrative questions 400 times. Open narrative responses synthesized by our bots were labeled as containing LLM-generated text (“yes”). Facebook responses were assigned a proxy label (“unclear”) as they may contain bots themselves. Using this binary label as ground truth, we fine-tuned prediction models relying on the “Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers” (BERT) model, resulting in an impressive prediction performance: The models accurately identified between 97% and 100% of bot responses. However, prediction performance decreases if the models make predictions about questions they were not fine-tuned with. Our study contributes to the ongoing discussion on bots and extends the methodological toolkit for protecting the quality and integrity of online survey data.","PeriodicalId":49509,"journal":{"name":"Social Science Computer Review","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Science Computer Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08944393251408022","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Online survey participants are frequently recruited through social media platforms, opt-in online access panels, and river sampling approaches. Such online surveys are threatened by bots that shift survey outcomes and exploit incentives. In this proof-of-concept study, we advance the identification of bots driven by Large Language Models (LLMs) through the prediction of LLM-generated text in open narrative responses. We conducted an online survey on same-gender partnerships, including three open narrative questions, and recruited 1512 participants through Facebook. In addition, we utilized two LLM-driven bots, each of which responded to the open narrative questions 400 times. Open narrative responses synthesized by our bots were labeled as containing LLM-generated text (“yes”). Facebook responses were assigned a proxy label (“unclear”) as they may contain bots themselves. Using this binary label as ground truth, we fine-tuned prediction models relying on the “Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers” (BERT) model, resulting in an impressive prediction performance: The models accurately identified between 97% and 100% of bot responses. However, prediction performance decreases if the models make predictions about questions they were not fine-tuned with. Our study contributes to the ongoing discussion on bots and extends the methodological toolkit for protecting the quality and integrity of online survey data.
通过法学硕士生成的文本在开放的叙事反应中识别机器人:概念验证研究
在线调查参与者通常是通过社交媒体平台、在线访问面板和河流抽样方法招募的。这种在线调查受到机器人的威胁,它们会改变调查结果并利用激励措施。在这项概念验证研究中,我们通过预测开放叙事响应中llm生成的文本,推进了由大型语言模型(llm)驱动的机器人的识别。我们进行了一项关于同性伴侣关系的在线调查,包括三个开放式叙述性问题,并通过Facebook招募了1512名参与者。此外,我们使用了两个llm驱动的机器人,每个机器人都回答了400次公开的叙述问题。我们的机器人合成的开放叙事反应被标记为包含llm生成的文本(“是”)。Facebook的回复被分配了一个代理标签(“不清楚”),因为它们本身可能包含机器人。使用这个二元标签作为基础事实,我们根据“变形金刚的双向编码器表示”(BERT)模型对预测模型进行了微调,产生了令人印象深刻的预测性能:模型准确识别了97%到100%的机器人响应。然而,如果模型对没有经过微调的问题进行预测,预测性能就会下降。我们的研究为正在进行的关于机器人的讨论做出了贡献,并扩展了保护在线调查数据质量和完整性的方法工具包。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Social Science Computer Review
Social Science Computer Review 社会科学-计算机:跨学科应用
CiteScore
9.00
自引率
4.90%
发文量
95
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Unique Scope Social Science Computer Review is an interdisciplinary journal covering social science instructional and research applications of computing, as well as societal impacts of informational technology. Topics included: artificial intelligence, business, computational social science theory, computer-assisted survey research, computer-based qualitative analysis, computer simulation, economic modeling, electronic modeling, electronic publishing, geographic information systems, instrumentation and research tools, public administration, social impacts of computing and telecommunications, software evaluation, world-wide web resources for social scientists. Interdisciplinary Nature Because the Uses and impacts of computing are interdisciplinary, so is Social Science Computer Review. The journal is of direct relevance to scholars and scientists in a wide variety of disciplines. In its pages you''ll find work in the following areas: sociology, anthropology, political science, economics, psychology, computer literacy, computer applications, and methodology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书