Fairness Definitions in Language Models Explained

Zhipeng Yin, Zichong Wang, Avash Palikhe, Wenbin Zhang
{"title":"Fairness Definitions in Language Models Explained","authors":"Zhipeng Yin, Zichong Wang, Avash Palikhe, Wenbin Zhang","doi":"10.1002/widm.70063","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Language Models (LMs) have demonstrated exceptional performance across various Natural Language Processing (NLP) tasks. Despite these advancements, LMs can inherit and amplify societal biases related to sensitive attributes such as gender and race, limiting their adoption in real‐world applications. Therefore, fairness has been extensively explored in LMs, leading to the proposal of various fairness notions. However, the lack of clear agreement on which fairness definition to apply in specific contexts and the complexity of understanding the distinctions between these definitions can create confusion and impede further progress. To this end, this paper proposes a systematic survey that clarifies the definitions of fairness as they apply to LMs. Specifically, we begin with a brief introduction to LMs and fairness in LMs, followed by a comprehensive, up‐to‐date overview of existing fairness notions in LMs and the introduction of a novel taxonomy that categorizes these concepts based on their transformer architecture: encoder‐only, decoder‐only, and encoder‐decoder LMs. We further illustrate each definition through experiments, showcasing their practical implications and outcomes. Finally, we discuss current research challenges and open questions, aiming to foster innovative ideas and advance the field. The repository is publicly available online at <jats:ext-link xmlns:xlink=\"http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink\" xlink:href=\"https://github.com/vanbanTruong/Fairness-in-Large-Language-Models/tree/main/definitions\">https://github.com/vanbanTruong/Fairness‐in‐Large‐Language‐Models/tree/main/definitions</jats:ext-link> . This article is categorized under: <jats:list list-type=\"simple\"> <jats:list-item> Commercial, Legal, and Ethical Issues &gt; Fairness in Data Mining </jats:list-item> <jats:list-item> Commercial, Legal, and Ethical Issues &gt; Social Considerations </jats:list-item> <jats:list-item> Technologies &gt; Artificial Intelligence </jats:list-item> </jats:list> .","PeriodicalId":501013,"journal":{"name":"WIREs Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery","volume":"51 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"WIREs Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/widm.70063","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Language Models (LMs) have demonstrated exceptional performance across various Natural Language Processing (NLP) tasks. Despite these advancements, LMs can inherit and amplify societal biases related to sensitive attributes such as gender and race, limiting their adoption in real‐world applications. Therefore, fairness has been extensively explored in LMs, leading to the proposal of various fairness notions. However, the lack of clear agreement on which fairness definition to apply in specific contexts and the complexity of understanding the distinctions between these definitions can create confusion and impede further progress. To this end, this paper proposes a systematic survey that clarifies the definitions of fairness as they apply to LMs. Specifically, we begin with a brief introduction to LMs and fairness in LMs, followed by a comprehensive, up‐to‐date overview of existing fairness notions in LMs and the introduction of a novel taxonomy that categorizes these concepts based on their transformer architecture: encoder‐only, decoder‐only, and encoder‐decoder LMs. We further illustrate each definition through experiments, showcasing their practical implications and outcomes. Finally, we discuss current research challenges and open questions, aiming to foster innovative ideas and advance the field. The repository is publicly available online at https://github.com/vanbanTruong/Fairness‐in‐Large‐Language‐Models/tree/main/definitions . This article is categorized under: Commercial, Legal, and Ethical Issues > Fairness in Data Mining Commercial, Legal, and Ethical Issues > Social Considerations Technologies > Artificial Intelligence .
解释语言模型中的公平性定义
语言模型(LMs)在各种自然语言处理(NLP)任务中表现出优异的性能。尽管取得了这些进步,但LMs可能会继承和放大与性别和种族等敏感属性相关的社会偏见,从而限制了它们在现实世界中的应用。因此,在lm中对公平性进行了广泛的探讨,并提出了各种公平性概念。然而,在具体情况下应用哪一个公平定义以及理解这些定义之间的区别的复杂性方面缺乏明确的共识,可能会造成混乱并阻碍进一步的进展。为此,本文提出了一个系统的调查,澄清公平的定义,因为他们适用于LMs。具体来说,我们首先简要介绍了LMs和LMs中的公平性,然后对LMs中现有公平性概念进行了全面的、最新的概述,并介绍了一种新的分类法,该分类法根据它们的转换器架构对这些概念进行了分类:仅编码器、仅解码器和编码器解码器LMs。我们通过实验进一步说明每个定义,展示它们的实际含义和结果。最后,我们讨论了当前的研究挑战和开放问题,旨在培养创新思想和推进该领域。该存储库可在https://github.com/vanbanTruong/Fairness‐in‐Large‐Language‐Models/tree/main/definitions上公开获取。本文被分类为:商业、法律和伦理问题;数据挖掘中的公平性;商业、法律和伦理问题;社会考虑技术;人工智能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书