Why primary caregivers fail to report pediatric pain: A qualitative study

IF 7.1 1区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Qiao Shen , Xiaoqiong Wei , Dong Roman Xu , Xiaoping Jiang , Hangyang Li , Hongyao Leng , Xianlan Zheng
{"title":"Why primary caregivers fail to report pediatric pain: A qualitative study","authors":"Qiao Shen ,&nbsp;Xiaoqiong Wei ,&nbsp;Dong Roman Xu ,&nbsp;Xiaoping Jiang ,&nbsp;Hangyang Li ,&nbsp;Hongyao Leng ,&nbsp;Xianlan Zheng","doi":"10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2026.105339","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>In many East Asian hospital settings where family members are closely involved in bedside care, caregivers play a crucial role in recognizing and reporting children's pain during hospitalization. Yet they often fail to inform healthcare providers, leading to inadequate interventions and prolonged suffering. While previous studies focused on whether pain is reported, the psychological mechanisms underlying non-reporting remain poorly understood, limiting the development of effective support strategies.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To explore why primary caregivers failed to report pediatric pain to healthcare providers, focusing on their decision-making process and influencing factors.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>Qualitative descriptive study.</div></div><div><h3>Setting(s)</h3><div>Multiple medical and surgical wards of a tertiary pediatric hospital in Chongqing, China.</div></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><div>Seventeen primary caregivers who observed their child in pain but did not report it to healthcare providers were purposively recruited.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Semi-structured interviews were conducted between January and March 2025. Data were analyzed using directed content analysis guided by Protection Motivation Theory.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Five themes and 17 subthemes were identified, revealing that caregivers' failure to report pediatric pain is a dynamic process shaped by attention activation, threat appraisal, coping appraisal, individual factors, and environmental factors. The process often begins with attentional filtering, where pain cues are overlooked due to competing demands or perceived normality. Once attention is activated, caregivers engage in threat and coping appraisals, which may involve underestimating the threat of pain, valuing pain tolerance, doubting reporting efficacy, holding strong self-management beliefs, or anticipating costs. These dual-path appraisals are influenced by personal traits and prior experiences, along with environmental factors like verbal persuasion, observational learning, and healthcare constraints, with some directly impeding communication. Together, these elements interact to suppress reporting, often accompanied by alternative soothing strategies.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Caregivers' failure to report pediatric pain is not a simple omission but a result of complex cognitive and contextual processes. Attentional disengagement and biased appraisals, shaped by personal beliefs and environmental cues, jointly suppress reporting behaviors. Understanding these mechanisms offers a foundation for targeted interventions that enhance caregiver awareness, reshape pain perceptions, and promote supportive communication in pediatric care.</div></div><div><h3>Registration</h3><div>Not registered.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50299,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Nursing Studies","volume":"177 ","pages":"Article 105339"},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Nursing Studies","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0020748926000118","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

In many East Asian hospital settings where family members are closely involved in bedside care, caregivers play a crucial role in recognizing and reporting children's pain during hospitalization. Yet they often fail to inform healthcare providers, leading to inadequate interventions and prolonged suffering. While previous studies focused on whether pain is reported, the psychological mechanisms underlying non-reporting remain poorly understood, limiting the development of effective support strategies.

Objective

To explore why primary caregivers failed to report pediatric pain to healthcare providers, focusing on their decision-making process and influencing factors.

Design

Qualitative descriptive study.

Setting(s)

Multiple medical and surgical wards of a tertiary pediatric hospital in Chongqing, China.

Participants

Seventeen primary caregivers who observed their child in pain but did not report it to healthcare providers were purposively recruited.

Methods

Semi-structured interviews were conducted between January and March 2025. Data were analyzed using directed content analysis guided by Protection Motivation Theory.

Results

Five themes and 17 subthemes were identified, revealing that caregivers' failure to report pediatric pain is a dynamic process shaped by attention activation, threat appraisal, coping appraisal, individual factors, and environmental factors. The process often begins with attentional filtering, where pain cues are overlooked due to competing demands or perceived normality. Once attention is activated, caregivers engage in threat and coping appraisals, which may involve underestimating the threat of pain, valuing pain tolerance, doubting reporting efficacy, holding strong self-management beliefs, or anticipating costs. These dual-path appraisals are influenced by personal traits and prior experiences, along with environmental factors like verbal persuasion, observational learning, and healthcare constraints, with some directly impeding communication. Together, these elements interact to suppress reporting, often accompanied by alternative soothing strategies.

Conclusions

Caregivers' failure to report pediatric pain is not a simple omission but a result of complex cognitive and contextual processes. Attentional disengagement and biased appraisals, shaped by personal beliefs and environmental cues, jointly suppress reporting behaviors. Understanding these mechanisms offers a foundation for targeted interventions that enhance caregiver awareness, reshape pain perceptions, and promote supportive communication in pediatric care.

Registration

Not registered.
为什么初级护理人员没有报告儿科疼痛:一项定性研究
在许多家庭成员密切参与床边护理的东亚医院环境中,护理人员在识别和报告住院期间儿童疼痛方面发挥着至关重要的作用。然而,他们往往没有通知卫生保健提供者,导致干预措施不足和长期痛苦。虽然以前的研究集中在疼痛是否被报告,但不报告的心理机制仍然知之甚少,限制了有效支持策略的发展。目的探讨初级护理人员未向医疗服务提供者报告儿童疼痛的原因,重点分析其决策过程及其影响因素。设计定性描述性研究。中国重庆某三级儿科医院的多个内科和外科病房。参与者:有目的地招募了17名观察到孩子疼痛但没有向医疗保健提供者报告的主要照顾者。方法于2025年1月~ 3月进行半结构化访谈。数据分析采用保护动机理论指导下的定向内容分析。结果共确定了5个主题和17个副主题,揭示了照顾者不报告儿童疼痛是一个受注意激活、威胁评价、应对评价、个体因素和环境因素共同影响的动态过程。这个过程通常从注意力过滤开始,在这个过程中,由于相互竞争的需求或感知到的正常情况,疼痛线索被忽视了。一旦注意力被激活,护理人员就会进行威胁和应对评估,这可能包括低估疼痛的威胁、重视疼痛耐受性、怀疑报告的有效性、持有强烈的自我管理信念或预期成本。这些双路径评估受到个人特征和先前经历的影响,以及语言说服、观察学习和医疗保健限制等环境因素的影响,其中一些直接阻碍了沟通。总之,这些因素相互作用,抑制报告,通常伴随着其他安抚策略。结论护理人员对儿童疼痛的漏报不是简单的疏漏,而是复杂的认知和情境过程的结果。由个人信念和环境线索形成的注意力脱离和有偏见的评估共同抑制了报告行为。了解这些机制为有针对性的干预提供了基础,这些干预可以提高护理人员的意识,重塑疼痛感知,并促进儿科护理中的支持性沟通。RegistrationNot注册。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
15.00
自引率
2.50%
发文量
181
审稿时长
21 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Nursing Studies (IJNS) is a highly respected journal that has been publishing original peer-reviewed articles since 1963. It provides a forum for original research and scholarship about health care delivery, organisation, management, workforce, policy, and research methods relevant to nursing, midwifery, and other health related professions. The journal aims to support evidence informed policy and practice by publishing research, systematic and other scholarly reviews, critical discussion, and commentary of the highest standard. The IJNS is indexed in major databases including PubMed, Medline, Thomson Reuters - Science Citation Index, Scopus, Thomson Reuters - Social Science Citation Index, CINAHL, and the BNI (British Nursing Index).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书