Transfer of clinical debriefing from simulation to practice: exploring the barriers and enablers.

IF 3.6 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Charlotte Jane Dewdney, Stephen Richard Waite, Katherine Ralston, Emma Claire Phillips, Edward Mellanby, Victoria Ruth Tallentire
{"title":"Transfer of clinical debriefing from simulation to practice: exploring the barriers and enablers.","authors":"Charlotte Jane Dewdney, Stephen Richard Waite, Katherine Ralston, Emma Claire Phillips, Edward Mellanby, Victoria Ruth Tallentire","doi":"10.1186/s41077-025-00405-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Clinical debriefing (CD) positively impacts individuals, teams and systems and has been shown to improve patient outcomes and staff wellbeing. Although there is a growing evidence base supporting CD, it has not been routinely adopted by many healthcare organisations. Despite the work environment being an important component of transfer of learning, there has been minimal focus on how it influences implementation and maintenance of CD in practice. The overall aim of this study was to explore the work environment barriers and enablers influencing the transfer of clinical debriefing skills from simulation to clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Following ethical approval, medical registrars who had participated in a simulation course involving a within-scenario CD were invited to participate in semi-structured interviews. These utilised Burke and Hutchins' evaluation model as the initial conceptual framework and took place at least two months post-course. Interviews explored participants' experiences of transferring learning related to CD from simulation to the clinical workplace, and were transcribed verbatim and dual coded using template analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifteen medical registrars participated in interviews between January and May 2025. The work environment influences from Burke and Hutchins' evaluation model resonated as important factors affecting adoption of CD. With the addition of subthemes generated inductively from the data, the model provided a framework for identification and articulation of the barriers and enablers to CD in the workplace. The most striking finding was participants' sense of personal responsibility to engage with CD. In addition, participants identified the requirement for cultural change to enable CD.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Work environment influences represent both barriers and enablers of CD in relation to the transfer of learning from simulation to clinical practice. Personal responsibility and workplace culture are important drivers of CD, and attention should be paid to the influence of both constructs in this context. Recommendations for practice, based on our findings, are designed to enable educators and organisations to promote the adoption of CD in their own settings. This will help to bridge the gap and make CD the norm, not the exception.</p>","PeriodicalId":72108,"journal":{"name":"Advances in simulation (London, England)","volume":" ","pages":"8"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12895721/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in simulation (London, England)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41077-025-00405-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Clinical debriefing (CD) positively impacts individuals, teams and systems and has been shown to improve patient outcomes and staff wellbeing. Although there is a growing evidence base supporting CD, it has not been routinely adopted by many healthcare organisations. Despite the work environment being an important component of transfer of learning, there has been minimal focus on how it influences implementation and maintenance of CD in practice. The overall aim of this study was to explore the work environment barriers and enablers influencing the transfer of clinical debriefing skills from simulation to clinical practice.

Methods: Following ethical approval, medical registrars who had participated in a simulation course involving a within-scenario CD were invited to participate in semi-structured interviews. These utilised Burke and Hutchins' evaluation model as the initial conceptual framework and took place at least two months post-course. Interviews explored participants' experiences of transferring learning related to CD from simulation to the clinical workplace, and were transcribed verbatim and dual coded using template analysis.

Results: Fifteen medical registrars participated in interviews between January and May 2025. The work environment influences from Burke and Hutchins' evaluation model resonated as important factors affecting adoption of CD. With the addition of subthemes generated inductively from the data, the model provided a framework for identification and articulation of the barriers and enablers to CD in the workplace. The most striking finding was participants' sense of personal responsibility to engage with CD. In addition, participants identified the requirement for cultural change to enable CD.

Conclusions: Work environment influences represent both barriers and enablers of CD in relation to the transfer of learning from simulation to clinical practice. Personal responsibility and workplace culture are important drivers of CD, and attention should be paid to the influence of both constructs in this context. Recommendations for practice, based on our findings, are designed to enable educators and organisations to promote the adoption of CD in their own settings. This will help to bridge the gap and make CD the norm, not the exception.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

临床汇报从模拟到实践的转变:探索障碍和推动因素。
背景:临床汇报(CD)对个人、团队和系统产生积极影响,并已被证明可以改善患者的治疗结果和员工的福祉。虽然有越来越多的证据支持乳糜泻,但它并没有被许多医疗机构常规采用。尽管工作环境是学习迁移的一个重要组成部分,但很少有人关注它在实践中如何影响CD的实施和维护。本研究的总体目的是探讨影响临床述职技能从模拟向临床实践转移的工作环境障碍和促成因素。方法:在伦理批准后,邀请参加了涉及场景内CD的模拟课程的医疗注册员参加半结构化访谈。这些使用伯克和哈钦斯的评估模型作为最初的概念框架,并在课程结束后至少两个月进行。访谈探讨了参与者将与CD相关的学习从模拟转移到临床工作场所的经历,并使用模板分析逐字转录和双重编码。结果:2025年1月至5月,15名医疗注册员参与了访谈。伯克和哈钦斯的评估模型对工作环境的影响是影响CD采用的重要因素。随着从数据中归纳产生的子主题的增加,该模型提供了一个框架,用于识别和阐明工作场所中CD的障碍和促进因素。最引人注目的发现是参与者对参与CD的个人责任感。此外,参与者确定了文化变革的要求,以实现CD。结论:工作环境的影响代表了CD的障碍和推动因素,涉及从模拟学习到临床实践的转移。个人责任和工作场所文化是CD的重要驱动因素,在此背景下,应注意这两个构念的影响。根据我们的研究结果,为实践提出了建议,旨在使教育工作者和组织能够在自己的环境中推广采用CD。这将有助于弥合差距,使CD成为常态,而不是例外。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书