Validation of the new "Brandenburg Acute Bile Duct (BABD) injury classification" system in 106 patients with accidental bile duct injuries during cholecystectomy.

IF 3.3 Q1 SURGERY
R Mantke, J Hafkesbrink, Paasch Ch, R Hunger
{"title":"Validation of the new \"Brandenburg Acute Bile Duct (BABD) injury classification\" system in 106 patients with accidental bile duct injuries during cholecystectomy.","authors":"R Mantke, J Hafkesbrink, Paasch Ch, R Hunger","doi":"10.1186/s13037-025-00451-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Bile duct injuries following laparoscopic cholecystectomy are rare but serious complications. Timely diagnosis and optimal management remain challenging. Classification systems for bile duct injuries may facilitate diagnosis, guide treatment, and improve outcomes, however their clinical use is limited. This study systematically evaluated existing classification systems and assessed their applicability to all types of injuries. Based on this analysis, a new classification system for acute lesions was developed.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The database of the German Arbitration Board for medical liability issues was queried to identify cases involving bile duct injuries following a cholecystectomy (1990-2021). For each patient, the anatomical location, extent of injury, and therapeutic approach were documented. Injuries were categorized according to 11 published classification systems and a newly developed classification system. The ability to categorize bile duct injuries of all systems was assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 106 bile duct injuries were identified. The common bile duct was the most frequently injured structure (31.1%), followed by combined injuries (27.4%), and injuries of the common hepatic duct (17.9%). In 13.2% of cases, an artery was injured in addition to the bile duct lesion. Only 30.2% of bile duct injuries were detected intraoperatively. The most frequently performed techniques were biliodigestive anastomosis (34.4%), direct bile duct anastomosis (31.3%), and leakage closure with stitches (28.1%). None of the 11 existing classifications could categorize all cases; the best-performing systems (Amsterdam, Hannover) classified 82-86%. In contrast, the new Brandenburg Acute Bile Duct Injury (BABD) Classification was able to categorize 99% of the injuries.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Current classification systems fail to categorize all acute bile duct injuries following cholecystectomies. The BABD Classification, which is based on the anatomical location and extent of injury, allows systematic categorization of all documented acute bile duct lesions and may improve diagnostic clarity, treatment planning, and comparability in future studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":46782,"journal":{"name":"Patient Safety in Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"6"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12857022/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Patient Safety in Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13037-025-00451-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Bile duct injuries following laparoscopic cholecystectomy are rare but serious complications. Timely diagnosis and optimal management remain challenging. Classification systems for bile duct injuries may facilitate diagnosis, guide treatment, and improve outcomes, however their clinical use is limited. This study systematically evaluated existing classification systems and assessed their applicability to all types of injuries. Based on this analysis, a new classification system for acute lesions was developed.

Methods: The database of the German Arbitration Board for medical liability issues was queried to identify cases involving bile duct injuries following a cholecystectomy (1990-2021). For each patient, the anatomical location, extent of injury, and therapeutic approach were documented. Injuries were categorized according to 11 published classification systems and a newly developed classification system. The ability to categorize bile duct injuries of all systems was assessed.

Results: A total of 106 bile duct injuries were identified. The common bile duct was the most frequently injured structure (31.1%), followed by combined injuries (27.4%), and injuries of the common hepatic duct (17.9%). In 13.2% of cases, an artery was injured in addition to the bile duct lesion. Only 30.2% of bile duct injuries were detected intraoperatively. The most frequently performed techniques were biliodigestive anastomosis (34.4%), direct bile duct anastomosis (31.3%), and leakage closure with stitches (28.1%). None of the 11 existing classifications could categorize all cases; the best-performing systems (Amsterdam, Hannover) classified 82-86%. In contrast, the new Brandenburg Acute Bile Duct Injury (BABD) Classification was able to categorize 99% of the injuries.

Discussion: Current classification systems fail to categorize all acute bile duct injuries following cholecystectomies. The BABD Classification, which is based on the anatomical location and extent of injury, allows systematic categorization of all documented acute bile duct lesions and may improve diagnostic clarity, treatment planning, and comparability in future studies.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

新的“勃兰登堡急性胆管损伤分类”系统在106例胆囊切除术中意外胆管损伤的验证
背景:腹腔镜胆囊切除术后胆管损伤罕见,但并发症严重。及时诊断和最佳管理仍然具有挑战性。胆管损伤的分类系统有助于诊断、指导治疗和改善预后,但其临床应用有限。本研究系统地评估了现有的分类系统,并评估了其对所有类型损伤的适用性。在此基础上,提出了一种新的急性病变分类系统。方法:查询德国医疗责任仲裁委员会数据库,以确定1990-2021年胆囊切除术后胆管损伤的病例。记录每位患者的解剖位置、损伤程度和治疗方法。根据11个已发表的分类系统和一个新开发的分类系统对损伤进行分类。评估对所有系统胆管损伤进行分类的能力。结果:共发现胆管损伤106例。损伤最多的是胆总管(31.1%),其次是复合损伤(27.4%),最后是肝总管损伤(17.9%)。在13.2%的病例中,除了胆管病变外,还损伤了一条动脉。术中胆管损伤检出率仅为30.2%。胆消化吻合术(34.4%)、直接胆管吻合术(31.3%)、漏缝缝合(28.1%)是最常见的手术方式。现有的11种分类都不能对所有病例进行分类;表现最好的城市(阿姆斯特丹、汉诺威)为82-86%。相比之下,新的Brandenburg急性胆管损伤(BABD)分类能够对99%的损伤进行分类。讨论:目前的分类系统不能对所有胆囊切除术后的急性胆管损伤进行分类。基于解剖位置和损伤程度的BABD分类允许对所有记录的急性胆管病变进行系统分类,并可能提高诊断清晰度、治疗计划和未来研究的可比性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
8.10%
发文量
37
审稿时长
9 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书