Unpacking the Emergency Health Kit of international humanitarian medical aid 1978-90: How humanitarian standards and supply chains became global.

IF 1.6 1区 历史学 Q1 HISTORY
Maria Cullen, Bertrand Taithe, Janelle Winters
{"title":"Unpacking the Emergency Health Kit of international humanitarian medical aid 1978-90: How humanitarian standards and supply chains became global.","authors":"Maria Cullen, Bertrand Taithe, Janelle Winters","doi":"10.1017/S1740022825100223","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This article considers the history of Emergency Health Kits established by United Nations agencies and the larger medical non-governmental organizations of the 1980s to analyse the significance of standardized responses in humanitarian emergencies. We argue that, far from being a rigid and immutable response, the kits reflected a (not universally realized) desire to standardize and control both supplies and medical care from international organizations. As such, humanitarian medical practice remained a disputed field in which each object or drug was negotiated at the risk of creating innovation traps. Coming at a time of increasingly global logistics capacities, the Emergency Health Kits became a central feature of a more coordinated global marketplace of humanitarian aid. The kits' promise to provide rapid transport of emergency supplies to crisis settings across the world was often experienced as a construct, with long delays and logjams in certain regions. Even so, humanitarian organizations were agents of globalization because they imagined a system of centralized production in the Global North and supply to isolated and/or insecure locations across the world.</p>","PeriodicalId":46192,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Global History","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7618611/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Global History","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1740022825100223","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article considers the history of Emergency Health Kits established by United Nations agencies and the larger medical non-governmental organizations of the 1980s to analyse the significance of standardized responses in humanitarian emergencies. We argue that, far from being a rigid and immutable response, the kits reflected a (not universally realized) desire to standardize and control both supplies and medical care from international organizations. As such, humanitarian medical practice remained a disputed field in which each object or drug was negotiated at the risk of creating innovation traps. Coming at a time of increasingly global logistics capacities, the Emergency Health Kits became a central feature of a more coordinated global marketplace of humanitarian aid. The kits' promise to provide rapid transport of emergency supplies to crisis settings across the world was often experienced as a construct, with long delays and logjams in certain regions. Even so, humanitarian organizations were agents of globalization because they imagined a system of centralized production in the Global North and supply to isolated and/or insecure locations across the world.

打开1978-90年国际人道主义医疗援助的紧急卫生包:人道主义标准和供应链如何全球化。
本文回顾了1980年代联合国各机构和较大的医疗非政府组织建立的应急保健包的历史,以分析人道主义紧急情况中标准化反应的重要性。我们认为,这些工具包远非一种僵化和一成不变的反应,而是反映了一种(尚未普遍实现的)愿望,即标准化和控制国际组织的供应和医疗保健。因此,人道主义医疗实践仍然是一个有争议的领域,每一种物品或药物都是冒着制造创新陷阱的风险进行谈判的。在全球物流能力日益增强的时代,紧急医疗包成为一个更加协调的全球人道主义援助市场的核心特征。这些急救包承诺向世界各地的危机环境提供紧急物资的快速运输,但往往被视为一种构想,在某些地区出现了长时间的延误和僵局。即便如此,人道主义组织仍是全球化的代理人,因为他们设想在全球北部建立一个集中生产的系统,并向世界各地孤立和/或不安全的地区供应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
5.30%
发文量
28
期刊介绍: Journal of Global History addresses the main problems of global change over time, together with the diverse histories of globalization. It also examines counter-currents to globalization, including those that have structured other spatial units. The journal seeks to transcend the dichotomy between "the West and the rest", straddle traditional regional boundaries, relate material to cultural and political history, and overcome thematic fragmentation in historiography. The journal also acts as a forum for interdisciplinary conversations across a wide variety of social and natural sciences. Published for London School of Economics and Political Science
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书