Population Screening for Type 1 Diabetes in Pediatrics via Well-Child Visits: Barriers and Facilitators to Implementation.

Q3 Medicine
Diabetes Spectrum Pub Date : 2025-11-20 eCollection Date: 2025-05-01 DOI:10.2337/ds25-0036
Christie Gilbert Klaczko, Nicole Walters, Alexis E Blackburn, Andrew Brangan, Gemme Campbell-Salome, Jessica Goehringer, Lakshmi Ilango, Michelle Pistner Nixon, Katrina M Romagnoli, Erin A Van Enkevort, Juliann M Savatt, Laney K Jones
{"title":"Population Screening for Type 1 Diabetes in Pediatrics via Well-Child Visits: Barriers and Facilitators to Implementation.","authors":"Christie Gilbert Klaczko, Nicole Walters, Alexis E Blackburn, Andrew Brangan, Gemme Campbell-Salome, Jessica Goehringer, Lakshmi Ilango, Michelle Pistner Nixon, Katrina M Romagnoli, Erin A Van Enkevort, Juliann M Savatt, Laney K Jones","doi":"10.2337/ds25-0036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Screening for type 1 diabetes provides an opportunity to identify those with presymptomatic, early-stage disease, enabling increased monitoring to prevent diabetic ketoacidosis and facilitating access to emerging therapies. Given potential benefits, discussions about population-wide type 1 diabetes screening are ongoing. Routine primary care visits could offer a scalable approach to such screening. We used mixed methods to explore multilevel barriers to and facilitators of type 1 diabetes autoantibody screening at well-child visits and, more broadly, the acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility of such a screening approach.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>Semi-structured interviews were completed with parents, clinicians, and health insurers. Transcripts were double coded using an iteratively adapted a priori codebook. A survey leveraging the validated Acceptability of Implementation, Intervention Appropriateness, and Feasibility of Intervention Measures instruments was deployed to assess pediatric primary care clinician perspectives.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 26 parents, 10 clinicians (endocrinologists and pediatricians), and two health insurers participated in interviews, and 15 pediatricians participated in the survey. Most parents interviewed and clinicians surveyed found type 1 diabetes screening acceptable and appropriate. Parents noted lack of education, need for a blood draw, costs, difficulty scheduling, and fear of results as barriers. Clinicians reported barriers including parental views on blood draws and clinician time. Insurers described lack of insurance coverage as a barrier. Facilitators across constituents included education, reduced costs, convenient screening, guidelines supporting screening, and institutional support.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>If population screening for type 1 diabetes is pursued, models that integrate primary care will be needed. Screening for type 1 diabetes through primary care well-child visits could enable high adoption if implementation strategies adequately address described barriers and promote facilitators.</p>","PeriodicalId":39737,"journal":{"name":"Diabetes Spectrum","volume":"38 5","pages":"572-586"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12784430/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetes Spectrum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2337/ds25-0036","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Screening for type 1 diabetes provides an opportunity to identify those with presymptomatic, early-stage disease, enabling increased monitoring to prevent diabetic ketoacidosis and facilitating access to emerging therapies. Given potential benefits, discussions about population-wide type 1 diabetes screening are ongoing. Routine primary care visits could offer a scalable approach to such screening. We used mixed methods to explore multilevel barriers to and facilitators of type 1 diabetes autoantibody screening at well-child visits and, more broadly, the acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility of such a screening approach.

Research design and methods: Semi-structured interviews were completed with parents, clinicians, and health insurers. Transcripts were double coded using an iteratively adapted a priori codebook. A survey leveraging the validated Acceptability of Implementation, Intervention Appropriateness, and Feasibility of Intervention Measures instruments was deployed to assess pediatric primary care clinician perspectives.

Results: A total of 26 parents, 10 clinicians (endocrinologists and pediatricians), and two health insurers participated in interviews, and 15 pediatricians participated in the survey. Most parents interviewed and clinicians surveyed found type 1 diabetes screening acceptable and appropriate. Parents noted lack of education, need for a blood draw, costs, difficulty scheduling, and fear of results as barriers. Clinicians reported barriers including parental views on blood draws and clinician time. Insurers described lack of insurance coverage as a barrier. Facilitators across constituents included education, reduced costs, convenient screening, guidelines supporting screening, and institutional support.

Conclusion: If population screening for type 1 diabetes is pursued, models that integrate primary care will be needed. Screening for type 1 diabetes through primary care well-child visits could enable high adoption if implementation strategies adequately address described barriers and promote facilitators.

Abstract Image

通过儿童访视对儿科1型糖尿病的人群筛查:实施的障碍和促进因素。
目的:1型糖尿病的筛查提供了一个机会来识别那些有症状前、早期疾病的患者,从而增加监测以预防糖尿病酮症酸中毒,并促进获得新兴疗法。鉴于潜在的益处,关于全民1型糖尿病筛查的讨论正在进行中。常规的初级保健访问可以为这种筛查提供可扩展的方法。我们使用混合方法来探索在健康儿童就诊时进行1型糖尿病自身抗体筛查的多重障碍和促进因素,以及更广泛地说,这种筛查方法的可接受性、适宜性和可行性。研究设计和方法:与父母、临床医生和健康保险公司完成半结构化访谈。转录本使用迭代改编的先验码本进行双重编码。一项调查利用实施的可接受性、干预的适当性和干预措施的可行性来评估儿科初级保健临床医生的观点。结果:共有26名家长、10名临床医生(内分泌科和儿科医生)、2名医疗保险公司参与访谈,15名儿科医生参与调查。接受采访的大多数家长和接受调查的临床医生认为1型糖尿病筛查是可以接受和适当的。家长们指出缺乏教育、需要抽血、费用、安排困难以及担心结果是障碍。临床医生报告的障碍包括父母对抽血的意见和临床医生的时间。保险公司称缺乏保险覆盖是一个障碍。促进因素包括教育、降低成本、方便筛选、支持筛选的指导方针和机构支持。结论:如果进行1型糖尿病的人群筛查,将需要整合初级保健的模式。如果实施策略能够充分解决所描述的障碍并促进促进因素,那么通过初级保健儿童访视筛查1型糖尿病可以实现高采用率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Diabetes Spectrum
Diabetes Spectrum Medicine-Internal Medicine
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
62
期刊介绍: The mission of Diabetes Spectrum: From Research to Practice is to assist health care professionals in the development of strategies to individualize treatment and diabetes self-management education for improved quality of life and diabetes control. These goals are achieved by presenting review as well as original, peer-reviewed articles on topics in clinical diabetes management, professional and patient education, nutrition, behavioral science and counseling, educational program development, and advocacy. In each issue, the FROM RESEARCH TO PRACTICE section explores, in depth, a diabetes care topic and provides practical application of current research findings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书