An assessment of autistic and parkinsonian movement profiles to inform selective classification algorithms.

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Lydia J Hickman, Dagmar S Fraser, Joseph M Galea, Francesca Happé, Jennifer L Cook
{"title":"An assessment of autistic and parkinsonian movement profiles to inform selective classification algorithms.","authors":"Lydia J Hickman, Dagmar S Fraser, Joseph M Galea, Francesca Happé, Jennifer L Cook","doi":"10.1186/s11689-025-09668-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Movement differences in autism have attracted growing attention in recent years. Anecdotally, autistic movement has been likened to that of Parkinson's Disease (PD). Given that PD assessments are primarily movement-based, it is important to ensure that autistic individuals are not scoring highly on PD diagnostic criteria due to autism-related movement differences. Quantifying overlap in movement profiles and identifying distinguishing features is essential, particularly given increased PD diagnosis rates in the autistic population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted the first direct comparison study of autistic and parkinsonian movement. Autistic individuals (N = 31), individuals with PD (N = 32) and control participants (N = 31) completed a Shapes Tracing Task and a Reaction Time Task. Kinematic features were compared between groups and classification algorithms were run to distinguish between groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Groups were distinguishable based on kinematic features. The autistic group differed from both PD and control groups in speed modulation and sub-movements, and from the PD group in reaction time. Classification algorithms for clinical (autism and PD) versus non-clinical groups, and for autism versus PD, were most accurate when combining kinematic and questionnaire data. There were no kinematic similarities between autism and PD that were also distinct from controls.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Whilst kinematic features did not appear similar between autism and PD, they were informative for group classification. This proof-of-concept study highlights that movement-based metrics may aid in identifying whether someone belongs to a clinical group, and which one - suggesting potential for refining diagnostic approaches for both autism and PD.</p>","PeriodicalId":16530,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neurodevelopmental Disorders","volume":" ","pages":"8"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12882580/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neurodevelopmental Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s11689-025-09668-8","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Movement differences in autism have attracted growing attention in recent years. Anecdotally, autistic movement has been likened to that of Parkinson's Disease (PD). Given that PD assessments are primarily movement-based, it is important to ensure that autistic individuals are not scoring highly on PD diagnostic criteria due to autism-related movement differences. Quantifying overlap in movement profiles and identifying distinguishing features is essential, particularly given increased PD diagnosis rates in the autistic population.

Methods: We conducted the first direct comparison study of autistic and parkinsonian movement. Autistic individuals (N = 31), individuals with PD (N = 32) and control participants (N = 31) completed a Shapes Tracing Task and a Reaction Time Task. Kinematic features were compared between groups and classification algorithms were run to distinguish between groups.

Results: Groups were distinguishable based on kinematic features. The autistic group differed from both PD and control groups in speed modulation and sub-movements, and from the PD group in reaction time. Classification algorithms for clinical (autism and PD) versus non-clinical groups, and for autism versus PD, were most accurate when combining kinematic and questionnaire data. There were no kinematic similarities between autism and PD that were also distinct from controls.

Conclusions: Whilst kinematic features did not appear similar between autism and PD, they were informative for group classification. This proof-of-concept study highlights that movement-based metrics may aid in identifying whether someone belongs to a clinical group, and which one - suggesting potential for refining diagnostic approaches for both autism and PD.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

自闭症和帕金森运动概况的评估,以告知选择性分类算法。
背景:自闭症的运动差异近年来引起了越来越多的关注。有趣的是,自闭症的运动被比作帕金森病(PD)。考虑到帕金森症的评估主要是基于运动,重要的是要确保自闭症患者不会因为自闭症相关的运动差异而在帕金森症诊断标准上得分很高。量化运动特征的重叠和识别区分特征是必要的,特别是考虑到自闭症人群PD诊断率的增加。方法:我们首次进行了自闭症和帕金森运动的直接比较研究。自闭症患者(N = 31)、PD患者(N = 32)和对照组(N = 31)分别完成形状追踪任务和反应时间任务。比较各组之间的运动特征,并运行分类算法来区分各组。结果:根据运动特征可区分类群。自闭症组在速度调节和亚动作方面与PD组和对照组不同,在反应时间方面与PD组不同。结合运动学数据和问卷调查数据,临床组(自闭症和PD)与非临床组、自闭症与PD的分类算法是最准确的。自闭症和PD之间没有运动学上的相似之处,这也与对照组不同。结论:虽然自闭症和PD之间的运动学特征并不相似,但它们对群体分类具有重要意义。这项概念验证研究强调,基于运动的指标可能有助于确定某人是否属于临床群体,以及属于哪一类,这表明了改进自闭症和PD诊断方法的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
4.10%
发文量
58
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Neurodevelopmental Disorders is an open access journal that integrates current, cutting-edge research across a number of disciplines, including neurobiology, genetics, cognitive neuroscience, psychiatry and psychology. The journal’s primary focus is on the pathogenesis of neurodevelopmental disorders including autism, fragile X syndrome, tuberous sclerosis, Turner Syndrome, 22q Deletion Syndrome, Prader-Willi and Angelman Syndrome, Williams syndrome, lysosomal storage diseases, dyslexia, specific language impairment and fetal alcohol syndrome. With the discovery of specific genes underlying neurodevelopmental syndromes, the emergence of powerful tools for studying neural circuitry, and the development of new approaches for exploring molecular mechanisms, interdisciplinary research on the pathogenesis of neurodevelopmental disorders is now increasingly common. Journal of Neurodevelopmental Disorders provides a unique venue for researchers interested in comparing and contrasting mechanisms and characteristics related to the pathogenesis of the full range of neurodevelopmental disorders, sharpening our understanding of the etiology and relevant phenotypes of each condition.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书