The Relationship Between Lactate Levels and Acute Kidney Injury Risk in Patients with Hemorrhagic Shock and Septic Shock: An Analysis Based on the MIMIC-IV Database.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Journal of Intensive Care Medicine Pub Date : 2026-09-01 Epub Date: 2026-01-09 DOI:10.1177/08850666251411914
Zhexuan Chen, Lingfeng Peng, Huankai Zhang, Duo Yang, Zongqiang Chen, Guibin Xie, Liangqing Zhang
{"title":"The Relationship Between Lactate Levels and Acute Kidney Injury Risk in Patients with Hemorrhagic Shock and Septic Shock: An Analysis Based on the MIMIC-IV Database.","authors":"Zhexuan Chen, Lingfeng Peng, Huankai Zhang, Duo Yang, Zongqiang Chen, Guibin Xie, Liangqing Zhang","doi":"10.1177/08850666251411914","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ObjectivesThis study endeavors to examine the relationship between lactate (LA) levels and the risk of acute kidney injury (AKI) in patients with hemorrhagic shock (HS) and septic shock (SS).Methods983 HS and 4086 SS patients from the MIMIC-IV database were included and analyzed using restricted cubic spline (RCS), Cox model, Kaplan-Meier (KM), and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.ResultsMultivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that elevated LA was significantly associated with higher risks of AKI and in-hospital mortality rate (IMR) (all P < .001). After adjusting for confounders, LA had a greater effect on AKI risk in SS patients (hazard ratio (HR) = 1.056 versus 1.05 in HS), whereas LA more strongly influenced IMR in HS patients (HR = 1.115 vs 1.08 in SS). The safe LA thresholds, where HR = 1, were 2.083 mmol/L for SS and 2.31 mmol/L for HS. KM analysis demonstrated significant differences in cumulative AKI incidence and IMR among different LA levels (Log-rank P < .001). In HS patients, AKI risk increased linearly with rising LA, reflecting cumulative hypoperfusion. In SS patients, AKI risk rose sharply at lower LA levels, likely due to the inflammatory cytokine storm. ROC analysis showed that LA improved the predictive performance of the Acute Physiology Score III (APSIII) and the Simplified Acute Physiology Score II (SAPSII), particularly in HS patients. The change in area under the curve (ΔAUC) of SAPSII for predicting IMR was +0.042 in HS and +0.013 in SS.ConclusionsLA is a key predictor of AKI risk and prognosis in HS or SS patients, and its impact is heterogeneous among different populations, suggesting that individualized monitoring thresholds are needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":16307,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Intensive Care Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"830-844"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Intensive Care Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08850666251411914","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ObjectivesThis study endeavors to examine the relationship between lactate (LA) levels and the risk of acute kidney injury (AKI) in patients with hemorrhagic shock (HS) and septic shock (SS).Methods983 HS and 4086 SS patients from the MIMIC-IV database were included and analyzed using restricted cubic spline (RCS), Cox model, Kaplan-Meier (KM), and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.ResultsMultivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that elevated LA was significantly associated with higher risks of AKI and in-hospital mortality rate (IMR) (all P < .001). After adjusting for confounders, LA had a greater effect on AKI risk in SS patients (hazard ratio (HR) = 1.056 versus 1.05 in HS), whereas LA more strongly influenced IMR in HS patients (HR = 1.115 vs 1.08 in SS). The safe LA thresholds, where HR = 1, were 2.083 mmol/L for SS and 2.31 mmol/L for HS. KM analysis demonstrated significant differences in cumulative AKI incidence and IMR among different LA levels (Log-rank P < .001). In HS patients, AKI risk increased linearly with rising LA, reflecting cumulative hypoperfusion. In SS patients, AKI risk rose sharply at lower LA levels, likely due to the inflammatory cytokine storm. ROC analysis showed that LA improved the predictive performance of the Acute Physiology Score III (APSIII) and the Simplified Acute Physiology Score II (SAPSII), particularly in HS patients. The change in area under the curve (ΔAUC) of SAPSII for predicting IMR was +0.042 in HS and +0.013 in SS.ConclusionsLA is a key predictor of AKI risk and prognosis in HS or SS patients, and its impact is heterogeneous among different populations, suggesting that individualized monitoring thresholds are needed.

失血性休克和脓毒性休克患者乳酸水平与急性肾损伤风险的关系:基于MIMIC-IV数据库的分析
目的探讨失血性休克(HS)和脓毒性休克(SS)患者乳酸(LA)水平与急性肾损伤(AKI)风险的关系。方法从MIMIC-IV数据库中选取983例HS和4086例SS患者,采用限制性三次样条(RCS)、Cox模型、Kaplan-Meier (KM)和受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析。结果多因素Cox回归分析显示,LA升高与AKI风险升高和住院死亡率(IMR)显著相关(P < 0.05)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Intensive Care Medicine
Journal of Intensive Care Medicine CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE-
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
3.20%
发文量
107
期刊介绍: Journal of Intensive Care Medicine (JIC) is a peer-reviewed bi-monthly journal offering medical and surgical clinicians in adult and pediatric intensive care state-of-the-art, broad-based analytic reviews and updates, original articles, reports of large clinical series, techniques and procedures, topic-specific electronic resources, book reviews, and editorials on all aspects of intensive/critical/coronary care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书