A Data Set of Paired Structural Segments Between Protein Data Bank and AlphaFold DB for Medium-Resolution Cryo-EM Density Maps: A Gap in Overall Structural Quality.

Thu Nguyen, Willy Wriggers, Jing He
{"title":"A Data Set of Paired Structural Segments Between Protein Data Bank and AlphaFold DB for Medium-Resolution Cryo-EM Density Maps: A Gap in Overall Structural Quality.","authors":"Thu Nguyen, Willy Wriggers, Jing He","doi":"10.1007/978-981-97-5087-0_5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The recent publication of the AlphaFold Protein Structure Database (AlphaFold DB) offers an opportunity to revisit and refine many existing structural models in computational biology. We tested the hypothesis that models determined from less-than-ideal cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM) data could benefit from more recent AlphaFold predictions. Ideally, atomic structures in the Protein Data Bank (PDB) are directly solved from experimental densities with a resolution higher than 4 Å. However, medium-resolution (5-10 Å) cryo-EM maps are also increasingly deposited in the Electron Microscopy Data Bank (EMDB), many of which have associated atomic models of varying quality. It is difficult to solve atomic structures from such medium-resolution maps directly, so modeling approaches often rely on the indirect fitting of known templates. Therefore, we hypothesize that early structural interpretations of medium-resolution cryo-EM maps in the EMDB could benefit from potentially more reliable AlphaFold models derived later after more structural templates become available in the PDB. To study the utility of AlphaFold-predicted models, we conducted systematic mapping between the PDB and AlphaFold DB for structures derived from medium-resolution cryo-EM density maps. A dataset of 918 nonredundant pairs of structural segments was established. Using MolProbity, a structural validation method, we observed a significant difference in the distributions of MolProbity scores between paired structural segments in the PDB and AlphaFold DB. The structural segments in the AlphaFold DB exhibit a unimodal distribution, with an average of 0.96 MolProbity score, which is better than the average (1.98) of their corresponding segments in the PDB. The MolProbity scores of structural segments in the PDB vary significantly more than those in the AlphaFold DB and exhibit a bimodal distribution with a longer tail, indicating a wider range of model quality owing to the diverse structure fitting and refinement strategies used in the past.</p>","PeriodicalId":93167,"journal":{"name":"Bioinformatics research and applications : ... international symposium, ISBRA ... proceedings. ISBRA (Conference)","volume":"14956 ","pages":"52-63"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12774667/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bioinformatics research and applications : ... international symposium, ISBRA ... proceedings. ISBRA (Conference)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-5087-0_5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The recent publication of the AlphaFold Protein Structure Database (AlphaFold DB) offers an opportunity to revisit and refine many existing structural models in computational biology. We tested the hypothesis that models determined from less-than-ideal cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM) data could benefit from more recent AlphaFold predictions. Ideally, atomic structures in the Protein Data Bank (PDB) are directly solved from experimental densities with a resolution higher than 4 Å. However, medium-resolution (5-10 Å) cryo-EM maps are also increasingly deposited in the Electron Microscopy Data Bank (EMDB), many of which have associated atomic models of varying quality. It is difficult to solve atomic structures from such medium-resolution maps directly, so modeling approaches often rely on the indirect fitting of known templates. Therefore, we hypothesize that early structural interpretations of medium-resolution cryo-EM maps in the EMDB could benefit from potentially more reliable AlphaFold models derived later after more structural templates become available in the PDB. To study the utility of AlphaFold-predicted models, we conducted systematic mapping between the PDB and AlphaFold DB for structures derived from medium-resolution cryo-EM density maps. A dataset of 918 nonredundant pairs of structural segments was established. Using MolProbity, a structural validation method, we observed a significant difference in the distributions of MolProbity scores between paired structural segments in the PDB and AlphaFold DB. The structural segments in the AlphaFold DB exhibit a unimodal distribution, with an average of 0.96 MolProbity score, which is better than the average (1.98) of their corresponding segments in the PDB. The MolProbity scores of structural segments in the PDB vary significantly more than those in the AlphaFold DB and exhibit a bimodal distribution with a longer tail, indicating a wider range of model quality owing to the diverse structure fitting and refinement strategies used in the past.

蛋白质数据库和AlphaFold数据库之间的配对结构片段数据集用于中分辨率冷冻电镜密度图:整体结构质量的差距。
最近发布的AlphaFold蛋白质结构数据库(AlphaFold DB)为重新审视和完善计算生物学中许多现有的结构模型提供了机会。我们测试了一个假设,即从不太理想的低温电子显微镜(cryo-EM)数据确定的模型可以从最近的AlphaFold预测中受益。理想情况下,蛋白质数据库(PDB)中的原子结构可以直接从实验密度中求解,分辨率高于4 Å。然而,中分辨率(5-10 Å)低温电镜图也越来越多地存储在电子显微镜数据库(EMDB)中,其中许多具有不同质量的相关原子模型。从这种中等分辨率的映射中直接求解原子结构是困难的,因此建模方法通常依赖于已知模板的间接拟合。因此,我们假设EMDB中中分辨率低温电镜图的早期结构解释可能受益于PDB中更多结构模板可用后衍生的潜在更可靠的AlphaFold模型。为了研究AlphaFold预测模型的实用性,我们对中分辨率低温电镜密度图得出的结构进行了PDB和AlphaFold DB之间的系统映射。建立了918对非冗余结构片段的数据集。使用结构验证方法MolProbity,我们观察到PDB和AlphaFold DB中配对结构段之间MolProbity分数的分布存在显著差异。AlphaFold DB中的结构段呈单峰分布,平均MolProbity得分为0.96,优于PDB中相应结构段的平均MolProbity得分1.98。PDB中结构段的MolProbity分数变化明显大于AlphaFold DB,呈现双峰分布,尾部较长,表明由于过去使用了不同的结构拟合和改进策略,模型质量范围更广。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书