Analysis of Pediatric Cervical Spine Injury Evaluation Workflow in the Emergency Department.

IF 1.9 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Annie J Truelove, Megan E Gregory, Fahd A Ahmad, Sean P Pajak, Nicole C Hammer, Daniel Corwin, Leah Tzimenatos, Scott O King, Matthew Szadkowski, Martin J Herman, Julie C Leonard
{"title":"Analysis of Pediatric Cervical Spine Injury Evaluation Workflow in the Emergency Department.","authors":"Annie J Truelove, Megan E Gregory, Fahd A Ahmad, Sean P Pajak, Nicole C Hammer, Daniel Corwin, Leah Tzimenatos, Scott O King, Matthew Szadkowski, Martin J Herman, Julie C Leonard","doi":"10.1016/j.acepjo.2025.100295","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The decision to image children for cervical spine injuries (CSI), an uncommon injury with high associated morbidity and mortality, is complex. X-rays and computed tomography are often used to screen for CSI; however, radiation exposure increases lifetime cancer risk. We recently developed a CSI prediction rule to inform pediatric imaging decisions. To guide implementation, we conducted a workflow analysis of CSI screening in children after blunt trauma.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We interviewed emergency departments (ED) and trauma clinicians at 21 hospitals following the applied cognitive task analysis task diagram, knowledge audit, and simulation interview approaches. Interviews were coded using a combined deductive-inductive approach to construct a workflow diagram and identify critical decisions with associated workflow junctures, decision makers, physical locations, and cognitive demands. We noted areas of high, medium, and low variability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We interviewed 48 participants (emergency medicine physicians and advanced practice providers [n = 22], nurses [n = 14], and surgeons [n = 12]) across 21 hospitals located in the Western (n = 15), Northeastern (n = 5), and Midwestern (n = 1) USA. Critical decisions within the pediatric CSI imaging decision workflow included trauma triaging, spinal motion restriction application, clinical clearance, decision to image, and imaging type. There was moderate-to-high variability between hospitals for most workflow junctures and decision makers. However, more consistent patterns emerged, such as a high level of ED and trauma attending involvement throughout the process. The knowledge audit revealed a heavy cognitive load associated with decision making. \"Big picture,\" \"past and future,\" \"noticing\", \"job smarts,\" and \"equipment\" were highly relevant cognitive demands.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Moderate-to-high between-hospital variability in workflow for decision making around CSI evaluation for pediatric trauma patients could potentially complicate CSI prediction rule implementation.</p>","PeriodicalId":73967,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open","volume":"7 1","pages":"100295"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12774723/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acepjo.2025.100295","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The decision to image children for cervical spine injuries (CSI), an uncommon injury with high associated morbidity and mortality, is complex. X-rays and computed tomography are often used to screen for CSI; however, radiation exposure increases lifetime cancer risk. We recently developed a CSI prediction rule to inform pediatric imaging decisions. To guide implementation, we conducted a workflow analysis of CSI screening in children after blunt trauma.

Methods: We interviewed emergency departments (ED) and trauma clinicians at 21 hospitals following the applied cognitive task analysis task diagram, knowledge audit, and simulation interview approaches. Interviews were coded using a combined deductive-inductive approach to construct a workflow diagram and identify critical decisions with associated workflow junctures, decision makers, physical locations, and cognitive demands. We noted areas of high, medium, and low variability.

Results: We interviewed 48 participants (emergency medicine physicians and advanced practice providers [n = 22], nurses [n = 14], and surgeons [n = 12]) across 21 hospitals located in the Western (n = 15), Northeastern (n = 5), and Midwestern (n = 1) USA. Critical decisions within the pediatric CSI imaging decision workflow included trauma triaging, spinal motion restriction application, clinical clearance, decision to image, and imaging type. There was moderate-to-high variability between hospitals for most workflow junctures and decision makers. However, more consistent patterns emerged, such as a high level of ED and trauma attending involvement throughout the process. The knowledge audit revealed a heavy cognitive load associated with decision making. "Big picture," "past and future," "noticing", "job smarts," and "equipment" were highly relevant cognitive demands.

Conclusion: Moderate-to-high between-hospital variability in workflow for decision making around CSI evaluation for pediatric trauma patients could potentially complicate CSI prediction rule implementation.

Abstract Image

急诊科儿童颈椎损伤评估工作流程分析
目的:儿童颈椎损伤(CSI)是一种发病率和死亡率高的罕见损伤,对其进行影像学检查的决定是复杂的。x射线和计算机断层扫描常用于筛查CSI;然而,辐射暴露会增加终生患癌症的风险。我们最近开发了CSI预测规则,为儿科影像学决策提供信息。为了指导实施,我们对钝性创伤后儿童CSI筛查的工作流程进行了分析。方法:采用应用认知任务分析、任务图、知识审计和模拟访谈等方法,对21家医院的急诊科(ED)和创伤科临床医生进行访谈。访谈使用一种组合的演绎-归纳方法进行编码,以构建工作流图,并通过相关的工作流节点、决策者、物理位置和认知需求识别关键决策。我们注意到了高、中、低变异性的区域。结果:我们采访了48名参与者(急诊医师和高级执业医师[n = 22]、护士[n = 14]和外科医生[n = 12]),他们来自美国西部(n = 15)、东北部(n = 5)和中西部(n = 1)的21家医院。儿童CSI成像决策流程中的关键决策包括创伤分诊、脊柱运动限制应用、临床清除、成像决策和成像类型。对于大多数工作流程节点和决策者来说,医院之间存在中等到高度的可变性。然而,更一致的模式出现了,比如在整个过程中高水平的ED和创伤护理参与。知识审计揭示了与决策相关的沉重的认知负荷。“大局观”、“过去和未来”、“注意”、“工作智慧”和“设备”是高度相关的认知需求。结论:针对儿科创伤患者CSI评估的决策流程在医院间存在中高差异,这可能会使CSI预测规则的实施复杂化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
5 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书