Annie J Truelove, Megan E Gregory, Fahd A Ahmad, Sean P Pajak, Nicole C Hammer, Daniel Corwin, Leah Tzimenatos, Scott O King, Matthew Szadkowski, Martin J Herman, Julie C Leonard
{"title":"Analysis of Pediatric Cervical Spine Injury Evaluation Workflow in the Emergency Department.","authors":"Annie J Truelove, Megan E Gregory, Fahd A Ahmad, Sean P Pajak, Nicole C Hammer, Daniel Corwin, Leah Tzimenatos, Scott O King, Matthew Szadkowski, Martin J Herman, Julie C Leonard","doi":"10.1016/j.acepjo.2025.100295","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The decision to image children for cervical spine injuries (CSI), an uncommon injury with high associated morbidity and mortality, is complex. X-rays and computed tomography are often used to screen for CSI; however, radiation exposure increases lifetime cancer risk. We recently developed a CSI prediction rule to inform pediatric imaging decisions. To guide implementation, we conducted a workflow analysis of CSI screening in children after blunt trauma.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We interviewed emergency departments (ED) and trauma clinicians at 21 hospitals following the applied cognitive task analysis task diagram, knowledge audit, and simulation interview approaches. Interviews were coded using a combined deductive-inductive approach to construct a workflow diagram and identify critical decisions with associated workflow junctures, decision makers, physical locations, and cognitive demands. We noted areas of high, medium, and low variability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We interviewed 48 participants (emergency medicine physicians and advanced practice providers [n = 22], nurses [n = 14], and surgeons [n = 12]) across 21 hospitals located in the Western (n = 15), Northeastern (n = 5), and Midwestern (n = 1) USA. Critical decisions within the pediatric CSI imaging decision workflow included trauma triaging, spinal motion restriction application, clinical clearance, decision to image, and imaging type. There was moderate-to-high variability between hospitals for most workflow junctures and decision makers. However, more consistent patterns emerged, such as a high level of ED and trauma attending involvement throughout the process. The knowledge audit revealed a heavy cognitive load associated with decision making. \"Big picture,\" \"past and future,\" \"noticing\", \"job smarts,\" and \"equipment\" were highly relevant cognitive demands.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Moderate-to-high between-hospital variability in workflow for decision making around CSI evaluation for pediatric trauma patients could potentially complicate CSI prediction rule implementation.</p>","PeriodicalId":73967,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open","volume":"7 1","pages":"100295"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12774723/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acepjo.2025.100295","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: The decision to image children for cervical spine injuries (CSI), an uncommon injury with high associated morbidity and mortality, is complex. X-rays and computed tomography are often used to screen for CSI; however, radiation exposure increases lifetime cancer risk. We recently developed a CSI prediction rule to inform pediatric imaging decisions. To guide implementation, we conducted a workflow analysis of CSI screening in children after blunt trauma.
Methods: We interviewed emergency departments (ED) and trauma clinicians at 21 hospitals following the applied cognitive task analysis task diagram, knowledge audit, and simulation interview approaches. Interviews were coded using a combined deductive-inductive approach to construct a workflow diagram and identify critical decisions with associated workflow junctures, decision makers, physical locations, and cognitive demands. We noted areas of high, medium, and low variability.
Results: We interviewed 48 participants (emergency medicine physicians and advanced practice providers [n = 22], nurses [n = 14], and surgeons [n = 12]) across 21 hospitals located in the Western (n = 15), Northeastern (n = 5), and Midwestern (n = 1) USA. Critical decisions within the pediatric CSI imaging decision workflow included trauma triaging, spinal motion restriction application, clinical clearance, decision to image, and imaging type. There was moderate-to-high variability between hospitals for most workflow junctures and decision makers. However, more consistent patterns emerged, such as a high level of ED and trauma attending involvement throughout the process. The knowledge audit revealed a heavy cognitive load associated with decision making. "Big picture," "past and future," "noticing", "job smarts," and "equipment" were highly relevant cognitive demands.
Conclusion: Moderate-to-high between-hospital variability in workflow for decision making around CSI evaluation for pediatric trauma patients could potentially complicate CSI prediction rule implementation.