Redesigning Advanced Life Support teaching and assessment using a constructive alignment approach.

MedEdPublish (2016) Pub Date : 2025-08-28 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.12688/mep.20968.1
Sophie Moll, Nico Tannemann, Margarita Gestmann, Thorsten Brenner, Frank Herbstreit, Cynthia Szalai
{"title":"Redesigning Advanced Life Support teaching and assessment using a constructive alignment approach.","authors":"Sophie Moll, Nico Tannemann, Margarita Gestmann, Thorsten Brenner, Frank Herbstreit, Cynthia Szalai","doi":"10.12688/mep.20968.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Advanced Life Support (ALS) is a crucial component of medical training. Previously, a single-person OSCE-Station (Objective Structured Clinical Exam) was used to assess these skills, focusing primarily on the team leader role and emphasizing theoretical knowledge. However, students demonstrated deficiencies in key algorithm-compliant practical skills, such as cardiac massage, mask ventilation and defibrillator use, and struggled to integrate into a team-based resuscitation approach. To address this, a constructive alignment approach was used to revise the course and offer a guideline-appropriate, three-person resuscitation model. Learning outcomes and assessment targets were aligned with the course activities to increase student engagement and increase desired skill attainment. In the summer semester 2023, students and lecturers were briefed on the new structure of the course and assessment, specific skills were highlighted, and a model video was provided. The OSCE format was adjusted to assess both practical and non-technical skills. In the new setup, each student was randomly assigned one of three roles and assessed using role-specific checklists with defined criteria, focusing on non-technical and practical abilities. Course activity included training and practice in the three-person resuscitation approach. A team OSCE (tOSCE) approach for assessment was used, with one student for each role being examined. Results indicated both subjective and objective markers of satisfaction in course activities and tOSCE results. A team-based OSCE station proves effective for teaching combined practical and non-technical competencies.</p>","PeriodicalId":74136,"journal":{"name":"MedEdPublish (2016)","volume":"15 ","pages":"48"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12775656/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MedEdPublish (2016)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12688/mep.20968.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Advanced Life Support (ALS) is a crucial component of medical training. Previously, a single-person OSCE-Station (Objective Structured Clinical Exam) was used to assess these skills, focusing primarily on the team leader role and emphasizing theoretical knowledge. However, students demonstrated deficiencies in key algorithm-compliant practical skills, such as cardiac massage, mask ventilation and defibrillator use, and struggled to integrate into a team-based resuscitation approach. To address this, a constructive alignment approach was used to revise the course and offer a guideline-appropriate, three-person resuscitation model. Learning outcomes and assessment targets were aligned with the course activities to increase student engagement and increase desired skill attainment. In the summer semester 2023, students and lecturers were briefed on the new structure of the course and assessment, specific skills were highlighted, and a model video was provided. The OSCE format was adjusted to assess both practical and non-technical skills. In the new setup, each student was randomly assigned one of three roles and assessed using role-specific checklists with defined criteria, focusing on non-technical and practical abilities. Course activity included training and practice in the three-person resuscitation approach. A team OSCE (tOSCE) approach for assessment was used, with one student for each role being examined. Results indicated both subjective and objective markers of satisfaction in course activities and tOSCE results. A team-based OSCE station proves effective for teaching combined practical and non-technical competencies.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

使用建设性的校准方法重新设计高级生命支持教学和评估。
高级生命支持(ALS)是医学培训的重要组成部分。以前,我们使用一个单独的OSCE-Station(客观结构化临床考试)来评估这些技能,主要侧重于团队领导角色,强调理论知识。然而,学生们在关键的符合算法的实用技能方面表现出不足,例如心脏按摩、面罩通气和除颤器的使用,并且难以融入以团队为基础的复苏方法。为了解决这个问题,我们采用了一种建设性的校准方法来修改课程,并提供了一个适合指导方针的三人复苏模型。学习成果和评估目标与课程活动保持一致,以提高学生的参与度,提高所需技能的获得。在2023年夏季学期,学生和讲师简要介绍了新的课程结构和评估,突出了特定技能,并提供了一个示范视频。欧安组织的格式进行了调整,以评估实用技能和非技术技能。在新的设置中,每个学生被随机分配到三个角色中的一个,并使用具有定义标准的角色特定检查表进行评估,重点关注非技术和实践能力。课程活动包括三人复苏方法的培训和实践。采用欧安组织(toce)小组评估方法,每个角色由一名学生接受审查。结果显示学生对课程活动满意度的主客观指标及toce成绩。事实证明,欧安组织以团队为基础的工作站对结合实践能力和非技术能力的教学是有效的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
2 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书