Maximilian A Meyer, Stijn D Nelen, Kyra Benavent, R Marijn Houwert, Falco Hietbrink, Dafang Zhang
{"title":"The Effect of Mental Illness on Reoperation Rates and Follow-Up after Surgical Fixation of Distal Radius Fractures.","authors":"Maximilian A Meyer, Stijn D Nelen, Kyra Benavent, R Marijn Houwert, Falco Hietbrink, Dafang Zhang","doi":"10.1142/S2424835526500025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> This study aimed to assess whether the presence of psychiatric co-morbidity impacts reoperation rates or the ability to complete routine follow-up after open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of distal radius fractures. <b>Methods:</b> A retrospective cohort study was performed of all patients who underwent distal radius ORIF with a volar locking plate between January 2012 and December 2016 at two Level I trauma centres. Presence of a psychiatric diagnosis at the time of injury was recorded. Bivariate analysis was utilised to compare patient characteristics, injury characteristics, reoperation rates and length of follow-up between those with and without psychiatric co-morbidity. Multivariable regression analysis was performed to identify whether psychiatric co-morbidity was predictive of reoperation or the ability to complete routine post-operative follow-up. <b>Results:</b> A total of 1,071 patients sustaining 1,110 distal radius fractures (39 bilateral injuries) met the inclusion criteria, of whom 338 patients (30.5%) had a psychiatric diagnosis at the time of injury. Bivariate analysis revealed a higher proportion of females in the psychiatric co-morbidity cohort (79% vs. 66%). There was no difference in reoperation rates (18% vs. 13%, <i>p</i> = 0.10) nor length of follow-up (12.8 months vs. 14.3 months, <i>p</i> = 0.67) between the psychiatric co-morbidity and control cohorts. Multivariable logistic regression revealed that the presence of psychiatric co-morbidity did not independently predict reoperation rate nor length of follow-up. <b>Conclusions:</b> The presence of psychiatric co-morbidity does not affect post-operative follow-up or need for revision surgery after distal radius ORIF. <b>Level of Evidence:</b> Level IV (Therapeutic).</p>","PeriodicalId":51689,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hand Surgery-Asian-Pacific Volume","volume":" ","pages":"13-19"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hand Surgery-Asian-Pacific Volume","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1142/S2424835526500025","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: This study aimed to assess whether the presence of psychiatric co-morbidity impacts reoperation rates or the ability to complete routine follow-up after open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of distal radius fractures. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was performed of all patients who underwent distal radius ORIF with a volar locking plate between January 2012 and December 2016 at two Level I trauma centres. Presence of a psychiatric diagnosis at the time of injury was recorded. Bivariate analysis was utilised to compare patient characteristics, injury characteristics, reoperation rates and length of follow-up between those with and without psychiatric co-morbidity. Multivariable regression analysis was performed to identify whether psychiatric co-morbidity was predictive of reoperation or the ability to complete routine post-operative follow-up. Results: A total of 1,071 patients sustaining 1,110 distal radius fractures (39 bilateral injuries) met the inclusion criteria, of whom 338 patients (30.5%) had a psychiatric diagnosis at the time of injury. Bivariate analysis revealed a higher proportion of females in the psychiatric co-morbidity cohort (79% vs. 66%). There was no difference in reoperation rates (18% vs. 13%, p = 0.10) nor length of follow-up (12.8 months vs. 14.3 months, p = 0.67) between the psychiatric co-morbidity and control cohorts. Multivariable logistic regression revealed that the presence of psychiatric co-morbidity did not independently predict reoperation rate nor length of follow-up. Conclusions: The presence of psychiatric co-morbidity does not affect post-operative follow-up or need for revision surgery after distal radius ORIF. Level of Evidence: Level IV (Therapeutic).
背景:本研究旨在评估精神合并症的存在是否会影响桡骨远端骨折切开复位内固定(ORIF)后的再手术率或完成常规随访的能力。方法:对2012年1月至2016年12月在两个一级创伤中心接受桡骨远端ORIF并掌侧锁定钢板的所有患者进行回顾性队列研究。在受伤时记录了精神科诊断。双变量分析用于比较患者特征、损伤特征、再手术率和随访时间。进行多变量回归分析以确定精神病学合并症是否预示着再次手术或完成常规术后随访的能力。结果:1071例桡骨远端骨折1110例(双侧损伤39例)符合纳入标准,其中338例(30.5%)在损伤时有精神病学诊断。双变量分析显示,女性在精神病共发病队列中的比例更高(79%对66%)。两组患者的再手术率(18% vs. 13%, p = 0.10)和随访时间(12.8个月vs. 14.3个月,p = 0.67)均无差异。多变量逻辑回归显示,精神病学合并症的存在并不能独立预测再手术率和随访时间。结论:精神合并症不影响桡骨远端ORIF术后随访或翻修手术的需要。证据等级:IV级(治疗性)。