Historic Real-World Outcomes and Future Benchmarks for Patients with Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma Receiving First- and Second-Line Therapy in Austria - a Large Single-Center Experience.

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Technology in Cancer Research & Treatment Pub Date : 2026-01-01 Epub Date: 2026-01-08 DOI:10.1177/15330338251410356
Michael Leisch, Dominik Kiem, Christoph Grabmer, Anton Kugler, Gianfranco Pocobelli, Mayer Marie-Christina, Bernd Schöpf, Alexander Egle, Richard Greil, Thomas Melchardt
{"title":"Historic Real-World Outcomes and Future Benchmarks for Patients with Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma Receiving First- and Second-Line Therapy in Austria - a Large Single-Center Experience.","authors":"Michael Leisch, Dominik Kiem, Christoph Grabmer, Anton Kugler, Gianfranco Pocobelli, Mayer Marie-Christina, Bernd Schöpf, Alexander Egle, Richard Greil, Thomas Melchardt","doi":"10.1177/15330338251410356","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundDiffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most common form of non-Hodgkin-lymphoma. Although it can be cured in many patients, a significant proportion of patients fail the primary treatment and require second-line treatment. Currently, only limited data on real-world outcomes with standard therapies in Austrian patients with DLBCL are available, and while novel therapies are emerging, no historical benchmarks have been established to serve as a reference for these novel treatments.MethodsWe performed a retrospective, single-center analysis of patients with DLBCL diagnosed between 2010 and 2018 who had been treated with standard therapies. To establish efficacy benchmarks for novel therapies, we applied both clinical-trial and real-world-derived criteria to analyze the outcomes of patients potentially eligible for novel or future treatments.ResultsAlthough many patients can be cured with frontline therapy, outcomes are poor, especially in high-risk patients. Patients failing frontline therapy, especially those fulfilling the chimeric antigen-receptor (CAR) T-cell eligibility criteria, had dismal outcomes, and very few patients achieved long-term remission. Our data provide benchmark outcomes for patients eligible for novel treatments such as antibody-drug-conjugate (ADC) or CAR T-cell therapy-based treatments for potential future comparative analyses.ConclusionsPatients with DLBCL treated in Austria showed comparable outcomes to those reported in other real-world studies. Overall, standard chemotherapy-based approaches provide unsatisfactory outcomes in high-risk patients and patients in whom frontline therapy fails. Because many patients are now eligible for alternative first- and second-line treatments, such as ADC-based or CAR T-cell therapy, our efficacy benchmarks can serve for the future evaluation of these therapies in the Austrian healthcare environment.</p>","PeriodicalId":22203,"journal":{"name":"Technology in Cancer Research & Treatment","volume":"25 ","pages":"15330338251410356"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12783576/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Technology in Cancer Research & Treatment","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15330338251410356","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundDiffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most common form of non-Hodgkin-lymphoma. Although it can be cured in many patients, a significant proportion of patients fail the primary treatment and require second-line treatment. Currently, only limited data on real-world outcomes with standard therapies in Austrian patients with DLBCL are available, and while novel therapies are emerging, no historical benchmarks have been established to serve as a reference for these novel treatments.MethodsWe performed a retrospective, single-center analysis of patients with DLBCL diagnosed between 2010 and 2018 who had been treated with standard therapies. To establish efficacy benchmarks for novel therapies, we applied both clinical-trial and real-world-derived criteria to analyze the outcomes of patients potentially eligible for novel or future treatments.ResultsAlthough many patients can be cured with frontline therapy, outcomes are poor, especially in high-risk patients. Patients failing frontline therapy, especially those fulfilling the chimeric antigen-receptor (CAR) T-cell eligibility criteria, had dismal outcomes, and very few patients achieved long-term remission. Our data provide benchmark outcomes for patients eligible for novel treatments such as antibody-drug-conjugate (ADC) or CAR T-cell therapy-based treatments for potential future comparative analyses.ConclusionsPatients with DLBCL treated in Austria showed comparable outcomes to those reported in other real-world studies. Overall, standard chemotherapy-based approaches provide unsatisfactory outcomes in high-risk patients and patients in whom frontline therapy fails. Because many patients are now eligible for alternative first- and second-line treatments, such as ADC-based or CAR T-cell therapy, our efficacy benchmarks can serve for the future evaluation of these therapies in the Austrian healthcare environment.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

奥地利弥漫性大b细胞淋巴瘤患者接受一线和二线治疗的历史现实结果和未来基准-一项大型单中心研究
背景弥漫性大b细胞淋巴瘤(DLBCL)是最常见的非霍奇金淋巴瘤。虽然许多患者可以治愈,但很大比例的患者未能接受初级治疗,需要二线治疗。目前,奥地利DLBCL患者使用标准疗法的真实结果数据有限,虽然新疗法正在出现,但没有建立历史基准作为这些新疗法的参考。方法:我们对2010年至2018年诊断为DLBCL的患者进行了回顾性、单中心分析,这些患者接受了标准治疗。为了建立新疗法的疗效基准,我们应用了临床试验和现实世界衍生的标准来分析可能适合新疗法或未来疗法的患者的结果。结果一线治疗虽能治愈许多患者,但预后较差,尤其是高危患者。一线治疗失败的患者,特别是那些符合CAR -t细胞治疗标准的患者,预后不佳,很少有患者获得长期缓解。我们的数据为符合新治疗条件的患者提供了基准结果,如抗体-药物偶联(ADC)或基于CAR - t细胞治疗的治疗,用于潜在的未来比较分析。结论:在奥地利接受DLBCL治疗的患者显示出与其他现实世界研究报告相似的结果。总的来说,标准的基于化疗的方法在高危患者和一线治疗失败的患者中提供了令人不满意的结果。由于许多患者现在有资格接受替代的一线和二线治疗,例如基于adc或CAR - t细胞治疗,我们的疗效基准可以为奥地利医疗保健环境中这些疗法的未来评估提供服务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
202
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Technology in Cancer Research & Treatment (TCRT) is a JCR-ranked, broad-spectrum, open access, peer-reviewed publication whose aim is to provide researchers and clinicians with a platform to share and discuss developments in the prevention, diagnosis, treatment, and monitoring of cancer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书