The hybrid renewable energy community approach (HyRECA): Synergising electricity access with bush encroachment mitigation in rural Southern Africa

Stuart Daniel James , Markus Killinger , Chiedza Ngonidzashe Mutanga , Romain Pirard , Mario Einax , Matthias Huber , Tobias Bader
{"title":"The hybrid renewable energy community approach (HyRECA): Synergising electricity access with bush encroachment mitigation in rural Southern Africa","authors":"Stuart Daniel James ,&nbsp;Markus Killinger ,&nbsp;Chiedza Ngonidzashe Mutanga ,&nbsp;Romain Pirard ,&nbsp;Mario Einax ,&nbsp;Matthias Huber ,&nbsp;Tobias Bader","doi":"10.1016/j.rset.2025.100136","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Rural electrification and bush encroachment in Southern Africa have long been studied separately. Research shows that hybrid renewable energy systems (HRES) offer viable solutions for off-grid communities, and bush encroachment mitigation is widely recognised as an ecological priority. Using Jamataka, Botswana, as a case study, this study integrates both, asking under which conditions encroacher bush-based HRES are economically viable, which electricity access levels local populations can afford, and whether biomass utilisation contributes to mitigation. Findings indicate strong potential for bush-based HRES in off-grid areas, but competitiveness declines where low-cost grid electricity is available. Economic viability is examined through levelised cost of electricity (LCOE) across alternative HRES configurations. HOMER Pro® simulations indicate PV/biomass/battery systems are most cost-effective off-grid, achieving 100 % renewable fractions, near zero CO₂ emissions, and LCOE of 0.246 $/kWh. In grid-connected contexts without feed-in, PV/diesel/grid combinations dominate (LCOE 0.117 $/kWh) due to low tariffs, but with higher emissions. A novel affordability analysis using household willingness to pay and the World Bank Multi-Tier Framework indicates that all households reach at least Tier 3 electricity access under grid-connected systems and &gt;70 % off-grid, supporting household-use of medium-power appliances. Sustainable biomass extraction clears ∼12 ha annually (∼120 t) in Jamataka, aiding bush encroachment mitigation. Upscaling indicates potential to electrify 1.35 million people in &gt;900 bush-encroached villages across Botswana, Namibia, and South Africa, using &lt;1 % of encroached land – highlighting significant untapped potential. Future research should validate findings through geospatial modelling with high-resolution biomass data and spatially sensitive biomass cost models for region-wide planning.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":101071,"journal":{"name":"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Transition","volume":"9 ","pages":"Article 100136"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Transition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667095X25000352","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/12/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rural electrification and bush encroachment in Southern Africa have long been studied separately. Research shows that hybrid renewable energy systems (HRES) offer viable solutions for off-grid communities, and bush encroachment mitigation is widely recognised as an ecological priority. Using Jamataka, Botswana, as a case study, this study integrates both, asking under which conditions encroacher bush-based HRES are economically viable, which electricity access levels local populations can afford, and whether biomass utilisation contributes to mitigation. Findings indicate strong potential for bush-based HRES in off-grid areas, but competitiveness declines where low-cost grid electricity is available. Economic viability is examined through levelised cost of electricity (LCOE) across alternative HRES configurations. HOMER Pro® simulations indicate PV/biomass/battery systems are most cost-effective off-grid, achieving 100 % renewable fractions, near zero CO₂ emissions, and LCOE of 0.246 $/kWh. In grid-connected contexts without feed-in, PV/diesel/grid combinations dominate (LCOE 0.117 $/kWh) due to low tariffs, but with higher emissions. A novel affordability analysis using household willingness to pay and the World Bank Multi-Tier Framework indicates that all households reach at least Tier 3 electricity access under grid-connected systems and >70 % off-grid, supporting household-use of medium-power appliances. Sustainable biomass extraction clears ∼12 ha annually (∼120 t) in Jamataka, aiding bush encroachment mitigation. Upscaling indicates potential to electrify 1.35 million people in >900 bush-encroached villages across Botswana, Namibia, and South Africa, using <1 % of encroached land – highlighting significant untapped potential. Future research should validate findings through geospatial modelling with high-resolution biomass data and spatially sensitive biomass cost models for region-wide planning.
混合可再生能源社区方法(HyRECA):在南部非洲农村将电力接入与减少丛林侵占相结合
长期以来,人们一直分别对南部非洲的农村电气化和丛林入侵进行研究。研究表明,混合可再生能源系统(HRES)为离网社区提供了可行的解决方案,缓解丛林侵蚀被广泛认为是生态优先事项。本研究以博茨瓦纳的Jamataka为例,将两者结合起来,询问在哪些条件下侵占灌木的HRES在经济上是可行的,当地人口可以负担得起的电力接入水平,以及生物质利用是否有助于缓解。研究结果表明,在离网地区,基于灌木丛的HRES潜力巨大,但在有低成本电网供电的地区,竞争力下降。通过不同HRES配置的平准化电力成本(LCOE)来检查经济可行性。HOMER Pro®模拟表明,光伏/生物质/电池系统是最具成本效益的离网系统,实现100%可再生部分,接近零二氧化碳排放,LCOE为0.246美元/千瓦时。在没有上网的并网环境中,由于电价较低,光伏/柴油/电网组合占主导地位(LCOE 0.117美元/千瓦时),但排放量较高。利用家庭支付意愿和世界银行多层框架进行的一项新的负担能力分析表明,所有家庭在并网系统下至少达到三级电力接入,70%的家庭离网,支持家庭使用中等功率电器。在Jamataka,可持续的生物质提取每年清除约12公顷(约120吨),有助于减轻丛林入侵。升级表明,在博茨瓦纳、纳米比亚和南非的900个被丛林侵占的村庄中,有可能利用1%的被侵占土地为135万人供电,这凸显了巨大的未开发潜力。未来的研究应该通过高分辨率生物量数据和空间敏感生物量成本模型的地理空间建模来验证研究结果,以用于区域范围的规划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书