15 Years of optimizers in medical deep learning: A systematic review

Neuroscience informatics Pub Date : 2026-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-12-19 DOI:10.1016/j.neuri.2025.100249
Selorm Adablanu , Utpal Barman , Dulumani Das
{"title":"15 Years of optimizers in medical deep learning: A systematic review","authors":"Selorm Adablanu ,&nbsp;Utpal Barman ,&nbsp;Dulumani Das","doi":"10.1016/j.neuri.2025.100249","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Optimization algorithms are pivotal in training deep learning (DL) models for medical imaging, determining how efficiently models learn, generalize, and perform across modalities. This systematic review analyzed 69 peer-reviewed studies (2010–2025) on optimizer performance in classification, segmentation, and object detection tasks using MRI, CT, X-ray, ultrasound, histopathology, and ECG data, following PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Adaptive optimizers such as Adam and its variants were most common, offering rapid convergence in CNN-based classification, whereas SGD and momentum-based methods yielded stronger generalization in large-scale segmentation. Emerging techniques—Sharpness-Aware Minimization (SAM), Ranger, and AdamW—improved robustness under domain shift or noisy conditions. Hybrid and metaheuristic optimizers provided marginal accuracy gains but at higher computational cost. Common limitations included inconsistent hyperparameter reporting, limited external validation, and dataset bias toward North American cohorts. Optimizer effectiveness was found to be task- and architecture-dependent: adaptive methods suit small or noisy datasets, while momentum-based and hybrid methods enhance generalization for complex imaging. Future studies should emphasize standardized evaluation, transparent reporting, and diverse data to enable equitable and reproducible deployment of medical AI.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":74295,"journal":{"name":"Neuroscience informatics","volume":"6 1","pages":"Article 100249"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuroscience informatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772528625000640","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/12/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Optimization algorithms are pivotal in training deep learning (DL) models for medical imaging, determining how efficiently models learn, generalize, and perform across modalities. This systematic review analyzed 69 peer-reviewed studies (2010–2025) on optimizer performance in classification, segmentation, and object detection tasks using MRI, CT, X-ray, ultrasound, histopathology, and ECG data, following PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Adaptive optimizers such as Adam and its variants were most common, offering rapid convergence in CNN-based classification, whereas SGD and momentum-based methods yielded stronger generalization in large-scale segmentation. Emerging techniques—Sharpness-Aware Minimization (SAM), Ranger, and AdamW—improved robustness under domain shift or noisy conditions. Hybrid and metaheuristic optimizers provided marginal accuracy gains but at higher computational cost. Common limitations included inconsistent hyperparameter reporting, limited external validation, and dataset bias toward North American cohorts. Optimizer effectiveness was found to be task- and architecture-dependent: adaptive methods suit small or noisy datasets, while momentum-based and hybrid methods enhance generalization for complex imaging. Future studies should emphasize standardized evaluation, transparent reporting, and diverse data to enable equitable and reproducible deployment of medical AI.

Abstract Image

15年的医学深度学习优化器:系统回顾
优化算法是训练医学成像深度学习(DL)模型的关键,它决定了模型学习、泛化和跨模式执行的效率。本系统综述分析了69项同行评议的研究(2010-2025),根据PRISMA 2020指南,使用MRI、CT、x射线、超声、组织病理学和ECG数据,分析了优化器在分类、分割和目标检测任务中的性能。Adam及其变体等自适应优化器是最常见的,在基于cnn的分类中提供快速收敛,而SGD和基于动量的方法在大规模分割中产生了更强的泛化。新兴技术——锐度感知最小化(SAM)、Ranger和adamw——提高了在域移位或噪声条件下的鲁棒性。混合和元启发式优化器提供了边际精度增益,但计算成本较高。常见的限制包括不一致的超参数报告,有限的外部验证,以及对北美队列的数据集偏差。优化器的有效性取决于任务和架构:自适应方法适用于小数据集或有噪声的数据集,而基于动量和混合方法增强了复杂成像的泛化。未来的研究应强调标准化评估、透明报告和多样化数据,以实现医疗人工智能的公平和可重复部署。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neuroscience informatics
Neuroscience informatics Surgery, Radiology and Imaging, Information Systems, Neurology, Artificial Intelligence, Computer Science Applications, Signal Processing, Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Health Informatics, Clinical Neurology, Pathology and Medical Technology
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
57 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书