Virginia’s inpatient mental healthcare geography post SB260

IF 2.3 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Health Policy Open Pub Date : 2026-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-11-17 DOI:10.1016/j.hpopen.2025.100152
Mary Schwoerer, Timothy F. Leslie
{"title":"Virginia’s inpatient mental healthcare geography post SB260","authors":"Mary Schwoerer,&nbsp;Timothy F. Leslie","doi":"10.1016/j.hpopen.2025.100152","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study explores the impact of mental health policy reforms on geographic variations in inpatient psychiatric facility utilization and mental health outcomes in Virginia. Following the enactment of Senate Bill 260 (SB260), we observed significant changes in utilization patterns, particularly in regions with higher proportions of Medicaid-eligible populations. We identify nuanced factors influencing facility usage, including proximity to facilities and demographic characteristics, shedding light on the complex dynamics of mental health care access. Notably, our analysis indicates a notable increase in overall utilization of Virginia’s state-operated mental hospitals post-SB260, suggesting a greater fulfillment of unmet needs for inpatient care. Moreover, our research underscores the necessity to reconsider IMD exclusion laws, emphasizing the potential benefits of policy changes for underserved populations. This research contributes to mental health policy discussions by offering evidence-based considerations for future reforms aimed at improving access and equity in mental health care delivery in Virginia.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34527,"journal":{"name":"Health Policy Open","volume":"10 ","pages":"Article 100152"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Policy Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590229625000176","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/11/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study explores the impact of mental health policy reforms on geographic variations in inpatient psychiatric facility utilization and mental health outcomes in Virginia. Following the enactment of Senate Bill 260 (SB260), we observed significant changes in utilization patterns, particularly in regions with higher proportions of Medicaid-eligible populations. We identify nuanced factors influencing facility usage, including proximity to facilities and demographic characteristics, shedding light on the complex dynamics of mental health care access. Notably, our analysis indicates a notable increase in overall utilization of Virginia’s state-operated mental hospitals post-SB260, suggesting a greater fulfillment of unmet needs for inpatient care. Moreover, our research underscores the necessity to reconsider IMD exclusion laws, emphasizing the potential benefits of policy changes for underserved populations. This research contributes to mental health policy discussions by offering evidence-based considerations for future reforms aimed at improving access and equity in mental health care delivery in Virginia.
弗吉尼亚州的住院精神保健地理SB260后
本研究探讨心理健康政策改革对弗吉尼亚州住院精神科设施利用和心理健康结果的地理差异的影响。在参议院法案260 (SB260)颁布之后,我们观察到使用模式的显著变化,特别是在医疗补助合格人口比例较高的地区。我们确定了影响设施使用的细微因素,包括靠近设施和人口特征,揭示了精神卫生保健获取的复杂动态。值得注意的是,我们的分析表明,sb260之后,弗吉尼亚州州立精神病院的总体利用率显着增加,这表明住院治疗的未满足需求得到了更大的满足。此外,我们的研究强调了重新考虑IMD排除法的必要性,强调了政策变化对服务不足人群的潜在好处。这项研究通过为未来旨在改善弗吉尼亚州精神卫生保健服务的可及性和公平性的改革提供循证考虑,有助于精神卫生政策的讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health Policy Open
Health Policy Open Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
审稿时长
40 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书