Surviving ventricular fibrillation: A documented Lazarus phenomenon

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
American Journal of Emergency Medicine Pub Date : 2026-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-12-31 DOI:10.1016/j.ajem.2025.12.024
Oscar Thabouillot MD, PhD student , Emmanuel Rozenberg MD , Simon-Pierre Corcostegui MD , Clément Derkenne PhD
{"title":"Surviving ventricular fibrillation: A documented Lazarus phenomenon","authors":"Oscar Thabouillot MD, PhD student ,&nbsp;Emmanuel Rozenberg MD ,&nbsp;Simon-Pierre Corcostegui MD ,&nbsp;Clément Derkenne PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.ajem.2025.12.024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Case presentation</h3><div>A 94-year-old woman with no major medical history developed chest pain and experienced ventricular fibrillation at home. In accordance with written advance directives specifying refusal of “unreasonable or futile treatment,” no resuscitation was performed. After approximately ten minutes of asystole, spontaneous circulation resumed. Forty minutes later, the patient regained consciousness with complete neurologic recovery. Coronary angiography revealed significant coronary lesions that were successfully treated with two drug-eluting stents. The patient was discharged neurologically intact and remains well.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>This case documents a Lazarus phenomenon in the absence of any resuscitative maneuver—an event not previously described in the literature. Physiologic hypotheses may include delayed venous return, spontaneous myocardial reperfusion, or electrical recovery following ventricular fibrillation. The ethical implications are substantial, as the patient's interpretation of her advance directives differed markedly from the medical team's understanding. This case underscores both the physiological mystery of spontaneous circulation recovery and the ethical need for precise, individualized advance directives. It also highlights the importance of adaptability and clinical judgment when unexpected reversals of presumed death occur.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55536,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":"101 ","pages":"Pages 110-113"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0735675725007971","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/12/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Case presentation

A 94-year-old woman with no major medical history developed chest pain and experienced ventricular fibrillation at home. In accordance with written advance directives specifying refusal of “unreasonable or futile treatment,” no resuscitation was performed. After approximately ten minutes of asystole, spontaneous circulation resumed. Forty minutes later, the patient regained consciousness with complete neurologic recovery. Coronary angiography revealed significant coronary lesions that were successfully treated with two drug-eluting stents. The patient was discharged neurologically intact and remains well.

Discussion

This case documents a Lazarus phenomenon in the absence of any resuscitative maneuver—an event not previously described in the literature. Physiologic hypotheses may include delayed venous return, spontaneous myocardial reperfusion, or electrical recovery following ventricular fibrillation. The ethical implications are substantial, as the patient's interpretation of her advance directives differed markedly from the medical team's understanding. This case underscores both the physiological mystery of spontaneous circulation recovery and the ethical need for precise, individualized advance directives. It also highlights the importance of adaptability and clinical judgment when unexpected reversals of presumed death occur.
幸存的心室颤动:记载的拉撒路现象。
病例介绍:一名94岁女性,无重大病史,在家中出现胸痛和心室颤动。根据书面的预先指示,明确拒绝“不合理或无效的治疗”,没有进行复苏。大约停搏10分钟后,自然循环恢复。40分钟后,患者意识恢复,神经功能完全恢复。冠状动脉造影显示明显的冠状动脉病变,成功治疗两个药物洗脱支架。患者出院时神经系统完好,目前状况良好。讨论:这个病例记录了一个拉撒路现象,在没有任何复苏操作的情况下,这是一个以前没有在文献中描述的事件。生理假说可能包括静脉回流延迟、自发心肌再灌注或心室颤动后的电恢复。伦理影响是实质性的,因为患者对她的预先指示的解释与医疗团队的理解明显不同。这个病例强调了自发循环恢复的生理奥秘和精确的、个性化的预先指示的伦理需要。它还强调了在假定死亡发生意外逆转时适应性和临床判断的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
5.60%
发文量
730
审稿时长
42 days
期刊介绍: A distinctive blend of practicality and scholarliness makes the American Journal of Emergency Medicine a key source for information on emergency medical care. Covering all activities concerned with emergency medicine, it is the journal to turn to for information to help increase the ability to understand, recognize and treat emergency conditions. Issues contain clinical articles, case reports, review articles, editorials, international notes, book reviews and more.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书