Transarterial Embolization in Osteoarthritis of the Knee: Mechanism of Action and Current Results.

IF 7.1 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Federico Collettini, Florian N Fleckenstein, Tobias Winkler, Dieter C Wirtz, Carsten Perka, Bernhard Gebauer
{"title":"Transarterial Embolization in Osteoarthritis of the Knee: Mechanism of Action and Current Results.","authors":"Federico Collettini, Florian N Fleckenstein, Tobias Winkler, Dieter C Wirtz, Carsten Perka, Bernhard Gebauer","doi":"10.3238/arztebl.m2025.0221","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Approximately 5.2 million people in Germany suffer from osteoarthritis of the knee. Minimally invasive embolization of the genicular artery (GAE) was first described in 2015. It reduces pathologically altered synovial vascularization in the periarticular tissue and the associated inflammatory processes. It is thought that this can inhibit the disease process and relieve pain in patients with symptomatic osteoarthritis of the knee who do not respond to conservative treatment. In this review, we assess this technique with regard to its safety and efficacy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This narrative review is based on pertinent publications (2015-2025) retrieved by a search in the PubMed/Medline and Google Scholar databases for prospective and retrospective clinical studies and meta-analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>25 studies on GAE have appeared since 2015, among them three randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with sham controls (n = 21; n = 59; n = 58). In a small-scale multicenter RCT (n = 21), GAE reduced pain to a markedly greater extent at 1 month compared to controls (VAS difference 50.1 mm, 95% confidence interval [29.0-72.3]; p < 0.01). Two larger RCTs did not reveal any significant additional benefit compared to sham treatment. In the Australian triple-blind RCT (n = 59) the mean improvement in the KOOS pain score at 12 months was higher in the GAE group (41.3% vs 29.4%), but the difference between groups was not significant. In the Dutch RCT (n = 58), the mean improvement in the KOOS pain score at 4 months was 21.4 points [13.9-28.8] after GAE and 18.4 [11.6-25.1] after sham treatment; the intergroup difference of 3 points was not significant ([-7.1 to 13.0], p = 0.31). Adverse events were rare and generally self-limiting.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Before-and-after studies showed safe pain relief by GAE, but these findings have not been confirmed by the RCTs that have been carried out to date. Current evidence is mixed. Larger-scale, methodologically robust RCTs are needed so that the efficacy of GAE and its role in the treatment of symptomatic knee osteoarthritis can be reliably evaluated.</p>","PeriodicalId":11258,"journal":{"name":"Deutsches Arzteblatt international","volume":" Forthcoming","pages":"97-101"},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13058595/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Deutsches Arzteblatt international","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3238/arztebl.m2025.0221","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Approximately 5.2 million people in Germany suffer from osteoarthritis of the knee. Minimally invasive embolization of the genicular artery (GAE) was first described in 2015. It reduces pathologically altered synovial vascularization in the periarticular tissue and the associated inflammatory processes. It is thought that this can inhibit the disease process and relieve pain in patients with symptomatic osteoarthritis of the knee who do not respond to conservative treatment. In this review, we assess this technique with regard to its safety and efficacy.

Methods: This narrative review is based on pertinent publications (2015-2025) retrieved by a search in the PubMed/Medline and Google Scholar databases for prospective and retrospective clinical studies and meta-analyses.

Results: 25 studies on GAE have appeared since 2015, among them three randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with sham controls (n = 21; n = 59; n = 58). In a small-scale multicenter RCT (n = 21), GAE reduced pain to a markedly greater extent at 1 month compared to controls (VAS difference 50.1 mm, 95% confidence interval [29.0-72.3]; p < 0.01). Two larger RCTs did not reveal any significant additional benefit compared to sham treatment. In the Australian triple-blind RCT (n = 59) the mean improvement in the KOOS pain score at 12 months was higher in the GAE group (41.3% vs 29.4%), but the difference between groups was not significant. In the Dutch RCT (n = 58), the mean improvement in the KOOS pain score at 4 months was 21.4 points [13.9-28.8] after GAE and 18.4 [11.6-25.1] after sham treatment; the intergroup difference of 3 points was not significant ([-7.1 to 13.0], p = 0.31). Adverse events were rare and generally self-limiting.

Conclusion: Before-and-after studies showed safe pain relief by GAE, but these findings have not been confirmed by the RCTs that have been carried out to date. Current evidence is mixed. Larger-scale, methodologically robust RCTs are needed so that the efficacy of GAE and its role in the treatment of symptomatic knee osteoarthritis can be reliably evaluated.

经动脉栓塞治疗膝关节骨关节炎:作用机制和目前的结果。
背景:德国大约有520万人患有膝关节骨关节炎。膝动脉微创栓塞术(GAE)于2015年首次被报道。它减少病理性改变的滑膜血管在关节周围组织和相关的炎症过程。据认为,这可以抑制疾病的进程和缓解疼痛的症状性膝骨关节炎患者谁不响应保守治疗。在这篇综述中,我们评估了该技术的安全性和有效性。方法:本叙述性综述基于PubMed/Medline和谷歌Scholar数据库中前瞻性和回顾性临床研究和荟萃分析检索的相关出版物(2015-2025)。结果:2015年以来共发表了25项关于GAE的研究,其中3项随机对照试验(rct)采用假对照(n = 21; n = 59; n = 58)。在一项小规模多中心随机对照试验(n = 21)中,与对照组相比,GAE在1个月时明显更大程度地减轻了疼痛(VAS差异50.1 mm, 95%可信区间[29.0-72.3];p结论:GAE前后研究显示GAE可以安全缓解疼痛,但这些发现尚未得到迄今为止进行的随机对照试验的证实。目前的证据好坏参半。需要更大规模、方法学上可靠的随机对照试验,以便可靠地评估GAE的疗效及其在治疗症状性膝骨关节炎中的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Deutsches Arzteblatt international
Deutsches Arzteblatt international 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
5.20%
发文量
306
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Deutsches Ärzteblatt International is a bilingual (German and English) weekly online journal that focuses on clinical medicine and public health. It serves as the official publication for both the German Medical Association and the National Association of Statutory Health Insurance Physicians. The journal is dedicated to publishing independent, peer-reviewed articles that cover a wide range of clinical medicine disciplines. It also features editorials and a dedicated section for scientific discussion, known as correspondence. The journal aims to provide valuable medical information to its international readership and offers insights into the German medical landscape. Since its launch in January 2008, Deutsches Ärzteblatt International has been recognized and included in several prestigious databases, which helps to ensure its content is accessible and credible to the global medical community. These databases include: Carelit CINAHL (Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature) Compendex DOAJ (Directory of Open Access Journals) EMBASE (Excerpta Medica database) EMNursing GEOBASE (Geoscience & Environmental Data) HINARI (Health InterNetwork Access to Research Initiative) Index Copernicus Medline (MEDLARS Online) Medpilot PsycINFO (Psychological Information Database) Science Citation Index Expanded Scopus By being indexed in these databases, Deutsches Ärzteblatt International's articles are made available to researchers, clinicians, and healthcare professionals worldwide, contributing to the global exchange of medical knowledge and research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书