Subcutaneous tissue disinfection is more effective than the use of electrocautery in reducing Cutibacterium acnes burden in open shoulder surgery

IF 2 Q2 Medicine
JSES International Pub Date : 2026-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-12-02 DOI:10.1016/j.jseint.2025.101408
Nicolas Gallusser MD , Bertrand Léger PhD , Caroline Passaplan MD , Stéphane Emonet MD , Beat Kaspar Moor PD
{"title":"Subcutaneous tissue disinfection is more effective than the use of electrocautery in reducing Cutibacterium acnes burden in open shoulder surgery","authors":"Nicolas Gallusser MD ,&nbsp;Bertrand Léger PhD ,&nbsp;Caroline Passaplan MD ,&nbsp;Stéphane Emonet MD ,&nbsp;Beat Kaspar Moor PD","doi":"10.1016/j.jseint.2025.101408","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div><em>Cutibacterium acnes</em> (<em>C</em>. <em>acnes</em>) is a pathogen linked to infections following shoulder surgery. Exposure can occur during surgical dissection and spread in the surgical field through the surgeon's gloves and instruments. Disinfection of the subcutaneous tissue has been shown to reduce its contamination. No evidence has been provided for a decrease in the transmission rate when the dissection is performed with an electrocautery. The aim of this study was to ascertain whether disinfection of subcutaneous tissue can reduce the <em>C</em>. <em>acnes</em> rate in primary open shoulder surgery in comparison with dissection performed with electrocautery. We also wanted to compare the contamination rate of the operating field after electrocautery dissection with those found in the literature.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>All patients who qualified for primary open shoulder surgery via a deltopectoral approach were prospectively included in our single-blinded, two-arm randomized clinical trial. For every patient, a skin swab from the surgical area was taken before the standard preparation of the skin. In the disinfection group, the subcutaneous layer was treated with povidone iodine solution after exposure of the deltoid fascia. The cautery group underwent subcutaneous tissue dissection using an electrocautery. After fully exposing the proximal humerus, 5 swabs were collected from various locations for microbiological analysis, following a rigorous protocol. All cultures were incubated for 14 days under both aerobic and anaerobic conditions.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Between February 2020 and July 2021, 210 shoulders were enrolled in 2 groups (140 disinfection vs. 70 cautery). The 2 groups showed no significant differences in terms of sex, age, body mass index, or diabetes prevalence. The subcutaneous disinfection protocol led to a significant decrease in the overall positive culture rate of the operating field for all bacteria (<em>P</em> = .001) and specifically for <em>C</em>. <em>acnes</em> (<em>P</em> = .021). The reduction of positive swabs for <em>C</em>. <em>acnes</em> was significant for both the surgeon's gloves (<em>P</em> = .004) and for the subcutaneous tissue (<em>P</em> = .009). <em>C</em>. <em>acnes</em> contamination rate was noted in 26% of patients in the electrocautery group and 13% in the disinfection group after exclusion of the outside scalpel blade sample, which was removed from the scrub nurse's instrument table and therefore no longer used during the procedure.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Disinfection of the subcutaneous tissue reduces the contamination rate of <em>C</em>. <em>acnes</em> by a factor of 2 during open shoulder surgery compared with an approach performed with electrocautery and could limit the contamination of the operating field.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34444,"journal":{"name":"JSES International","volume":"10 2","pages":"Article 101408"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JSES International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666638325003160","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/12/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Cutibacterium acnes (C. acnes) is a pathogen linked to infections following shoulder surgery. Exposure can occur during surgical dissection and spread in the surgical field through the surgeon's gloves and instruments. Disinfection of the subcutaneous tissue has been shown to reduce its contamination. No evidence has been provided for a decrease in the transmission rate when the dissection is performed with an electrocautery. The aim of this study was to ascertain whether disinfection of subcutaneous tissue can reduce the C. acnes rate in primary open shoulder surgery in comparison with dissection performed with electrocautery. We also wanted to compare the contamination rate of the operating field after electrocautery dissection with those found in the literature.

Methods

All patients who qualified for primary open shoulder surgery via a deltopectoral approach were prospectively included in our single-blinded, two-arm randomized clinical trial. For every patient, a skin swab from the surgical area was taken before the standard preparation of the skin. In the disinfection group, the subcutaneous layer was treated with povidone iodine solution after exposure of the deltoid fascia. The cautery group underwent subcutaneous tissue dissection using an electrocautery. After fully exposing the proximal humerus, 5 swabs were collected from various locations for microbiological analysis, following a rigorous protocol. All cultures were incubated for 14 days under both aerobic and anaerobic conditions.

Results

Between February 2020 and July 2021, 210 shoulders were enrolled in 2 groups (140 disinfection vs. 70 cautery). The 2 groups showed no significant differences in terms of sex, age, body mass index, or diabetes prevalence. The subcutaneous disinfection protocol led to a significant decrease in the overall positive culture rate of the operating field for all bacteria (P = .001) and specifically for C. acnes (P = .021). The reduction of positive swabs for C. acnes was significant for both the surgeon's gloves (P = .004) and for the subcutaneous tissue (P = .009). C. acnes contamination rate was noted in 26% of patients in the electrocautery group and 13% in the disinfection group after exclusion of the outside scalpel blade sample, which was removed from the scrub nurse's instrument table and therefore no longer used during the procedure.

Conclusion

Disinfection of the subcutaneous tissue reduces the contamination rate of C. acnes by a factor of 2 during open shoulder surgery compared with an approach performed with electrocautery and could limit the contamination of the operating field.
在开放性肩部手术中,皮下组织消毒比电灼更有效地减少痤疮表皮杆菌的负担
背景:痤疮表皮杆菌(C. acnes)是一种与肩部手术后感染相关的病原体。暴露可发生在手术解剖过程中,并通过外科医生的手套和器械在手术野中扩散。对皮下组织进行消毒已被证明可减少其污染。没有证据表明用电灼术进行解剖会降低传播率。本研究的目的是确定在初次肩部手术中,与电灼解剖相比,皮下组织消毒是否能降低痤疮杆菌的发生率。我们也想比较电切术后手术野的污染率与文献中发现的情况。方法所有符合经三角胸肌入路行首次开肩手术条件的患者前瞻性纳入我们的单盲、双臂随机临床试验。对于每位患者,在标准皮肤准备之前,从手术区域取拭子。消毒组在三角筋膜暴露后皮下用聚维酮碘溶液处理。烧灼组采用电灼法进行皮下组织剥离。在充分暴露肱骨近端后,按照严格的程序从不同位置收集5个拭子进行微生物分析。所有培养物在好氧和厌氧条件下孵育14天。结果2020年2月至2021年7月,210例肩关节患者分为2组(消毒组140例,烧灼组70例)。两组在性别、年龄、体重指数或糖尿病患病率方面均无显著差异。皮下消毒方案导致手术区所有细菌的总体阳性培养率显著降低(P = 0.001),特别是痤疮芽胞杆菌(P = 0.021)。对于外科医生的手套(P = 0.004)和皮下组织(P = 0.009),痤疮杆菌阳性拭子的减少是显著的。电灼组26%的患者和消毒组13%的患者在排除手术刀外刀片样本后发现痤疮污染率,手术刀外刀片从擦洗护士的仪器台上取出,因此在手术过程中不再使用。结论肩关节开放性手术中皮下消毒可使痤疮杆菌的污染率比电灼法降低2倍,并可限制手术野的污染。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JSES International
JSES International Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
174
审稿时长
14 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书