Importing pancreata for transplantation: a single-center experience across evolving allocation eras.

Frontiers in transplantation Pub Date : 2025-12-18 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/frtra.2025.1698617
Riccardo Tamburrini, Stacey Hidalgo, Glen Leverson, Dixon B Kaufman, Nikole A Neidlinger, David P Al-Adra, David D Aufhauser, Carrie Thiessen, Didier Mandelbrot, Sandesh Parajuli, Jon S Odorico
{"title":"Importing pancreata for transplantation: a single-center experience across evolving allocation eras.","authors":"Riccardo Tamburrini, Stacey Hidalgo, Glen Leverson, Dixon B Kaufman, Nikole A Neidlinger, David P Al-Adra, David D Aufhauser, Carrie Thiessen, Didier Mandelbrot, Sandesh Parajuli, Jon S Odorico","doi":"10.3389/frtra.2025.1698617","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Recent changes to allocation systems have increased the geographic distribution of pancreas offers, often originating from outside a transplant center's donor service area or region. The impact of this wider sharing on outcomes remains uncertain. This study analyzed outcomes of primary pancreas transplants (2000-2018) at a large transplant center, stratified retrospectively on the nautical miles distance from the donor hospital. Primary endpoints were death-censored graft survival (DC-GS), patient survival, and graft thrombosis at different time points. No significant differences were found in DC-GS or patient survival for recipients of simultaneous pancreas-kidney (SPK), pancreas after kidney (PAK), or pancreas transplant alone (PTA), regardless of the distance from the donor hospital to the transplant center. Thrombosis rates were comparable across groups. Imported pancreata were from younger donors with lower BMI compared to locally recovered grafts. These findings support the notion that importing pancreata for transplantation is a feasible and safe practice that benefits patients, increases organ utilization, while benefiting transplant center volume data and reducing waiting times for patients. Encouraging wider importation may reduce waiting times and improve access to pancreas transplantation.</p>","PeriodicalId":519976,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in transplantation","volume":"4 ","pages":"1698617"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12756387/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/frtra.2025.1698617","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Recent changes to allocation systems have increased the geographic distribution of pancreas offers, often originating from outside a transplant center's donor service area or region. The impact of this wider sharing on outcomes remains uncertain. This study analyzed outcomes of primary pancreas transplants (2000-2018) at a large transplant center, stratified retrospectively on the nautical miles distance from the donor hospital. Primary endpoints were death-censored graft survival (DC-GS), patient survival, and graft thrombosis at different time points. No significant differences were found in DC-GS or patient survival for recipients of simultaneous pancreas-kidney (SPK), pancreas after kidney (PAK), or pancreas transplant alone (PTA), regardless of the distance from the donor hospital to the transplant center. Thrombosis rates were comparable across groups. Imported pancreata were from younger donors with lower BMI compared to locally recovered grafts. These findings support the notion that importing pancreata for transplantation is a feasible and safe practice that benefits patients, increases organ utilization, while benefiting transplant center volume data and reducing waiting times for patients. Encouraging wider importation may reduce waiting times and improve access to pancreas transplantation.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

输入用于移植的胰腺:在不断发展的分配时代的单中心经验。
最近分配系统的变化增加了胰腺供应的地理分布,通常来自移植中心供体服务区或地区以外。这种更广泛的分享对结果的影响仍不确定。本研究分析了一家大型移植中心的原发性胰腺移植(2000-2018年)的结果,并根据离供体医院的海里距离进行回顾性分层。主要终点是不同时间点的死亡剔除移植存活(DC-GS)、患者存活和移植血栓形成。无论从供体医院到移植中心的距离如何,胰肾联合移植(SPK)、肾后胰移植(PAK)或单独胰移植(PTA)受者的DC-GS或患者生存率均无显著差异。各组间血栓形成率具有可比性。与本地恢复的移植物相比,进口胰腺来自较年轻的供体,BMI较低。这些发现支持这样一种观点,即输入胰腺用于移植是一种可行且安全的做法,有利于患者,增加器官利用率,同时有利于移植中心的容量数据和减少患者的等待时间。鼓励更广泛的进口可以减少等待时间并改善胰腺移植的可及性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书