The role of pulse oximeter in anxiety and exacerbations in COPD patients: A prospective observational study.

Nur Aleyna Yetkin, Fatma Yiğit Erarslan, Burcu Baran, Bilal Rabahoğlu, Nuri Tutar, İnci Gülmez
{"title":"The role of pulse oximeter in anxiety and exacerbations in COPD patients: A prospective observational study.","authors":"Nur Aleyna Yetkin, Fatma Yiğit Erarslan, Burcu Baran, Bilal Rabahoğlu, Nuri Tutar, İnci Gülmez","doi":"10.5578/tt.2025041142","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Pulse oximeter is commonly used by chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients for long-term oxygen therapy (LTOT) to monitor oxygen levels. This study investigated the association between oximeter use, anxiety severity, symptom burden, and healthcare utilization in this population.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This prospective observational study included 110 individuals with COPD who underwent LTOT. Data were collected on pulmonary function, modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) scores, and daily pulse oximeter use. Anxiety severity was assessed using the Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI). Healthcare utilization in the previous year, including outpatient-treated and inpatient-treated exacerbations, intensive care unit admissions, and non-exacerbation-related hospital admissions, was analyzed. Linear regression analysis was performed to identify the independent predictors of nonexacerbation-related hospital admissions.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>Among the participants, 68 (61.8%) reported using a home pulse oximeter. There were no significant differences in BAI scores (p= 0.678), oxygen therapy duration (p= 0.530), or mMRC scores (p= 0.251) between the groups. However, non-users had significantly higher rates of non-exacerbation-related hospital admissions than users (p< 0.001). In multivariable analysis, not using pulse oximeter independently predicted more non-exacerbationrelated admissions (B= 1.63, 95% CI: 0.94-2.32, p< 0.001), whereas anxiety and physiological measures were not significant.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Pulse oximeter use was not associated with anxiety or symptom severity among the patients with COPD receiving LTOT. However, non-use of pulse oximeter was independently associated with increased non-exacerbation-related hospital admissions. These findings suggest that pulse oximeter may support patient self-management and reduce unnecessary healthcare utilization, without contributing to anxiety.</p>","PeriodicalId":519894,"journal":{"name":"Tuberkuloz ve toraks","volume":"73 4","pages":"277-285"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tuberkuloz ve toraks","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5578/tt.2025041142","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Pulse oximeter is commonly used by chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients for long-term oxygen therapy (LTOT) to monitor oxygen levels. This study investigated the association between oximeter use, anxiety severity, symptom burden, and healthcare utilization in this population.

Materials and methods: This prospective observational study included 110 individuals with COPD who underwent LTOT. Data were collected on pulmonary function, modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) scores, and daily pulse oximeter use. Anxiety severity was assessed using the Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI). Healthcare utilization in the previous year, including outpatient-treated and inpatient-treated exacerbations, intensive care unit admissions, and non-exacerbation-related hospital admissions, was analyzed. Linear regression analysis was performed to identify the independent predictors of nonexacerbation-related hospital admissions.

Result: Among the participants, 68 (61.8%) reported using a home pulse oximeter. There were no significant differences in BAI scores (p= 0.678), oxygen therapy duration (p= 0.530), or mMRC scores (p= 0.251) between the groups. However, non-users had significantly higher rates of non-exacerbation-related hospital admissions than users (p< 0.001). In multivariable analysis, not using pulse oximeter independently predicted more non-exacerbationrelated admissions (B= 1.63, 95% CI: 0.94-2.32, p< 0.001), whereas anxiety and physiological measures were not significant.

Conclusions: Pulse oximeter use was not associated with anxiety or symptom severity among the patients with COPD receiving LTOT. However, non-use of pulse oximeter was independently associated with increased non-exacerbation-related hospital admissions. These findings suggest that pulse oximeter may support patient self-management and reduce unnecessary healthcare utilization, without contributing to anxiety.

脉搏血氧仪在COPD患者焦虑和加重中的作用:一项前瞻性观察研究。
脉搏血氧仪是慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者在长期氧疗(LTOT)中常用的监测氧水平的仪器。本研究调查了该人群中血氧仪使用、焦虑严重程度、症状负担和医疗保健利用之间的关系。材料和方法:这项前瞻性观察性研究包括110例COPD患者接受LTOT治疗。收集肺功能、修正医学研究委员会(mMRC)评分和每日脉搏血氧仪使用情况的数据。使用贝克焦虑量表(BAI)评估焦虑严重程度。分析了前一年的医疗保健利用情况,包括门诊治疗和住院治疗的病情加重、重症监护病房入院情况和与病情加重无关的住院情况。进行线性回归分析以确定非恶化相关住院的独立预测因子。结果:在参与者中,68人(61.8%)报告使用家用脉搏血氧仪。两组间BAI评分(p= 0.678)、氧疗时间(p= 0.530)、mMRC评分(p= 0.251)差异均无统计学意义。然而,非服用者的非恶化相关住院率明显高于服用者(p< 0.001)。在多变量分析中,不使用脉搏血氧仪独立预测更多的非恶化相关入院(B= 1.63, 95% CI: 0.94-2.32, p< 0.001),而焦虑和生理测量不显著。结论:在接受LTOT治疗的COPD患者中,脉搏血氧仪的使用与焦虑或症状严重程度无关。然而,不使用脉搏血氧仪与非恶化相关住院率增加独立相关。这些发现表明,脉搏血氧仪可以支持患者自我管理,减少不必要的医疗保健利用,而不会导致焦虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书