Provider Perspectives of Patient Experience Measurement and Quality Improvement in Primary Care.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Journal of Healthcare Management Pub Date : 2026-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-12-26 DOI:10.1097/JHM-D-24-00289
Nabeel Qureshi, Ron D Hays, Mary Ellen Slaughter, Efrain Talamantes, Denise D Quigley
{"title":"Provider Perspectives of Patient Experience Measurement and Quality Improvement in Primary Care.","authors":"Nabeel Qureshi, Ron D Hays, Mary Ellen Slaughter, Efrain Talamantes, Denise D Quigley","doi":"10.1097/JHM-D-24-00289","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Goal: </strong>Provider buy-in to leadership priorities, patient experience measurement, and quality improvement (QI) is necessary for sustained improvements in care. However, little is documented about provider perceptions of patient experience measurement and QI in primary care. We examined provider perceptions of the work environment, patient care issues, measurement of and improvement in care quality, as well as their knowledge and perceived usefulness of the Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS) Clinician and Group (CG-CAHPS) Survey measures for QI.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We surveyed and interviewed providers about their use of CG-CAHPS for QI. Of the 143 providers at a large urban Federally Qualified Health Center (FQHC), 74 (52% response) completed a web-based survey; 19 were also interviewed. We asked questions about the clinic environment, use of the CG-CAHPS survey, patient interactions, burnout, job satisfaction, and compensation. We replicated measures from six relevant surveys.</p><p><strong>Principal findings: </strong>Providers reported working in supportive environments that encouraged QI efforts, having leadership and colleagues who facilitated improvements that enabled them to do their job better (M = 3.8 on a 5-point scale), and serious efforts to solve problems (M = 3.7). Providers also reported significant barriers to patient care (e.g., time pressure and patient complexity). Interviews highlighted providers' difficulty in managing visit duration and ensuring effective patient-provider communication. Participants expressed mixed views on the usefulness of CG-CAHPS scores for QI (M = 2.5), suggesting a need for leadership to discuss and engage with CG-CAHPS performance more regularly. QI in primary care is often guided by patient experience outcomes. The time pressures faced by FQHC providers to care for patients with complex needs heighten the need for targeted interventions that enhance provider support. Providers also identified several areas that needed improvement, some of which are measured by CAHPS items: tools to communicate laboratory or other test results to patients, tools to elicit information on patient concerns, improved access to interpreter services, training for other care team staff, and more discussion of best practices.</p><p><strong>Practical applications: </strong>To improve the patient experience, primary care organizations should foster environments that support QI and invest more in QI that better incorporates patient feedback and experience measures in ways that are relevant to providers and actionable by organizations to improve care experiences. Addressing these issues has the potential to improve both patient care outcomes and provider satisfaction. This is both practical and important given that CAHPS measures or other standardized patient experience measures, although not mandated, are increasingly in use.</p>","PeriodicalId":51633,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Healthcare Management","volume":"71 1","pages":"34-57"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12774444/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Healthcare Management","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JHM-D-24-00289","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/12/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Goal: Provider buy-in to leadership priorities, patient experience measurement, and quality improvement (QI) is necessary for sustained improvements in care. However, little is documented about provider perceptions of patient experience measurement and QI in primary care. We examined provider perceptions of the work environment, patient care issues, measurement of and improvement in care quality, as well as their knowledge and perceived usefulness of the Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS) Clinician and Group (CG-CAHPS) Survey measures for QI.

Methods: We surveyed and interviewed providers about their use of CG-CAHPS for QI. Of the 143 providers at a large urban Federally Qualified Health Center (FQHC), 74 (52% response) completed a web-based survey; 19 were also interviewed. We asked questions about the clinic environment, use of the CG-CAHPS survey, patient interactions, burnout, job satisfaction, and compensation. We replicated measures from six relevant surveys.

Principal findings: Providers reported working in supportive environments that encouraged QI efforts, having leadership and colleagues who facilitated improvements that enabled them to do their job better (M = 3.8 on a 5-point scale), and serious efforts to solve problems (M = 3.7). Providers also reported significant barriers to patient care (e.g., time pressure and patient complexity). Interviews highlighted providers' difficulty in managing visit duration and ensuring effective patient-provider communication. Participants expressed mixed views on the usefulness of CG-CAHPS scores for QI (M = 2.5), suggesting a need for leadership to discuss and engage with CG-CAHPS performance more regularly. QI in primary care is often guided by patient experience outcomes. The time pressures faced by FQHC providers to care for patients with complex needs heighten the need for targeted interventions that enhance provider support. Providers also identified several areas that needed improvement, some of which are measured by CAHPS items: tools to communicate laboratory or other test results to patients, tools to elicit information on patient concerns, improved access to interpreter services, training for other care team staff, and more discussion of best practices.

Practical applications: To improve the patient experience, primary care organizations should foster environments that support QI and invest more in QI that better incorporates patient feedback and experience measures in ways that are relevant to providers and actionable by organizations to improve care experiences. Addressing these issues has the potential to improve both patient care outcomes and provider satisfaction. This is both practical and important given that CAHPS measures or other standardized patient experience measures, although not mandated, are increasingly in use.

初级保健中患者体验测量和质量改进的提供者视角。
目标:医疗服务提供者对领导优先级、患者体验测量和质量改进(QI)的认可是持续改善护理的必要条件。然而,关于提供者对初级保健中患者体验测量和QI的看法的文献很少。我们检查了提供者对工作环境、患者护理问题、护理质量的测量和改进的看法,以及他们对医疗保健提供者和系统消费者评估(CAHPS)临床医生和小组(CG-CAHPS) QI调查措施的了解和感知有用性。方法:我们对医疗服务提供者使用CG-CAHPS治疗QI的情况进行了调查和访谈。在大型城市联邦合格卫生中心(FQHC)的143名提供者中,74名(52%的回答者)完成了基于网络的调查;19人也接受了采访。我们询问了有关诊所环境、CG-CAHPS调查的使用、患者互动、倦怠、工作满意度和薪酬的问题。我们复制了六个相关调查的测量结果。主要发现:提供者报告说,他们工作在鼓励QI努力的支持性环境中,有领导和同事促进改进,使他们能够更好地完成工作(M = 3.8(5分制)),并认真努力解决问题(M = 3.7)。提供者还报告了患者护理的重大障碍(例如,时间压力和患者复杂性)。访谈强调了提供者在管理访问时间和确保有效的患者-提供者沟通方面的困难。参与者对CG-CAHPS QI分数(M = 2.5)的有用性表达了不同的看法,表明领导层需要更定期地讨论和参与CG-CAHPS的表现。初级保健中的QI通常以患者体验结果为指导。FQHC提供者在照顾有复杂需求的患者时面临的时间压力,增加了对有针对性的干预措施的需求,以加强提供者的支持。提供者还确定了几个需要改进的领域,其中一些是通过CAHPS项目来衡量的:向患者传达实验室或其他测试结果的工具,获取患者关注信息的工具,改善获得口译服务的机会,对其他护理团队工作人员的培训,以及更多关于最佳实践的讨论。实际应用:为了改善患者体验,初级保健组织应该营造支持QI的环境,并在QI方面投入更多资金,以便以与提供者相关的方式更好地整合患者反馈和体验措施,并由组织采取行动来改善护理体验。解决这些问题有可能改善患者护理结果和提供者满意度。这既实际又重要,因为CAHPS措施或其他标准化的患者体验措施虽然没有强制要求,但正在越来越多地使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Healthcare Management
Journal of Healthcare Management HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES-
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
5.60%
发文量
68
期刊介绍: The Journal of Healthcare Management is the official journal of the American College of Healthcare Executives. Six times per year, JHM offers timely healthcare management articles that inform and guide executives, managers, educators, and researchers. JHM also contains regular columns written by experts and practitioners in the field that discuss management-related topics and industry trends. Each issue presents an interview with a leading executive.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书