Using Stakeholder Engagement to Build Cancer Survivorship Care Coordination Capacity Between Primary and Oncology Care.

IF 2.3 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Health Equity Pub Date : 2025-11-10 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1177/24731242251385402
Julie S Armin, Sarah N Price, Elizabeth S Ver Hoeve, Yvonne Bueno, Leila Ali-Akbarian, Nancy Johnson, Elizabeth Calhoun, Lorena Verdugo, Heidi A Hamann
{"title":"Using Stakeholder Engagement to Build Cancer Survivorship Care Coordination Capacity Between Primary and Oncology Care.","authors":"Julie S Armin, Sarah N Price, Elizabeth S Ver Hoeve, Yvonne Bueno, Leila Ali-Akbarian, Nancy Johnson, Elizabeth Calhoun, Lorena Verdugo, Heidi A Hamann","doi":"10.1177/24731242251385402","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Cancer survivors experience gaps in access to timely and well-coordinated care. We describe stakeholder engagement activities across a university-based comprehensive cancer center and a primary care-focused federally qualified health center, which informed implementation and sustainability of community-focused cancer care coordination interventions to optimize care for underserved cancer patients in specialty and primary care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Methods were systematic, iterative, and flexible to establish and maintain trust, honesty, and collaborative decision-making between academic, community, and clinical partners. First, we collaboratively identified clinical (<i>N</i> = 43) and patient (<i>N</i> = 16) stakeholders and their needs through in-depth interviews and focus groups. Then, we planned, implemented, evaluated, and modified strategies to improve cancer care coordination in response to challenges and new information.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Primary care providers reported needing more information about cancer survivorship care and wanting more complete information about their patients' cancer treatment. Patients described concerns about cancer recurrence, challenges managing comorbid conditions, and economic concerns. These findings influenced the focus and implementation of a community navigation program at the academic cancer center and informed bi-directional information-sharing interventions with primary and oncology care partners, which included face-to-face meetings, service-learning opportunities, and improving data transmission through the electronic health record.</p><p><strong>Health equity implications: </strong>Health systems' mutual learning and resource sharing enhance patient cancer care coordination to address social determinants of health. Engaging partners at different levels within health systems (e.g., administrative staff and clinical leadership) ensures sustainability of relationships, interventions, and advocacy for cancer patients with significant social needs.</p>","PeriodicalId":36602,"journal":{"name":"Health Equity","volume":"9 1","pages":"648-656"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12758592/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Equity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/24731242251385402","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Cancer survivors experience gaps in access to timely and well-coordinated care. We describe stakeholder engagement activities across a university-based comprehensive cancer center and a primary care-focused federally qualified health center, which informed implementation and sustainability of community-focused cancer care coordination interventions to optimize care for underserved cancer patients in specialty and primary care.

Methods: Methods were systematic, iterative, and flexible to establish and maintain trust, honesty, and collaborative decision-making between academic, community, and clinical partners. First, we collaboratively identified clinical (N = 43) and patient (N = 16) stakeholders and their needs through in-depth interviews and focus groups. Then, we planned, implemented, evaluated, and modified strategies to improve cancer care coordination in response to challenges and new information.

Results: Primary care providers reported needing more information about cancer survivorship care and wanting more complete information about their patients' cancer treatment. Patients described concerns about cancer recurrence, challenges managing comorbid conditions, and economic concerns. These findings influenced the focus and implementation of a community navigation program at the academic cancer center and informed bi-directional information-sharing interventions with primary and oncology care partners, which included face-to-face meetings, service-learning opportunities, and improving data transmission through the electronic health record.

Health equity implications: Health systems' mutual learning and resource sharing enhance patient cancer care coordination to address social determinants of health. Engaging partners at different levels within health systems (e.g., administrative staff and clinical leadership) ensures sustainability of relationships, interventions, and advocacy for cancer patients with significant social needs.

利用利益相关者参与建立初级和肿瘤护理之间的癌症生存护理协调能力。
导言:癌症幸存者在获得及时和协调良好的护理方面存在差距。我们描述了跨大学综合癌症中心和以初级保健为重点的联邦合格健康中心的利益相关者参与活动,这为以社区为重点的癌症护理协调干预措施的实施和可持续性提供了信息,以优化专科和初级保健中服务不足的癌症患者的护理。方法:采用系统、迭代和灵活的方法,在学术界、社区和临床合作伙伴之间建立和维持信任、诚实和协同决策。首先,我们通过深度访谈和焦点小组合作确定临床(N = 43)和患者(N = 16)利益相关者及其需求。然后,我们计划、实施、评估和修改策略,以改善癌症护理协调,以应对挑战和新信息。结果:初级保健提供者报告需要更多关于癌症生存护理的信息,并希望获得有关其患者癌症治疗的更完整的信息。患者描述了对癌症复发的担忧,管理合并症的挑战,以及经济方面的担忧。这些发现影响了学术癌症中心社区导航计划的重点和实施,并为初级和肿瘤护理合作伙伴提供了双向信息共享干预措施,包括面对面会议、服务学习机会和通过电子健康记录改进数据传输。卫生公平影响:卫生系统的相互学习和资源共享加强了患者癌症护理协调,以解决健康的社会决定因素。让卫生系统内不同层次的合作伙伴(例如行政人员和临床领导)参与,可确保关系、干预措施和对具有重大社会需求的癌症患者的宣传的可持续性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health Equity
Health Equity Social Sciences-Health (social science)
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
3.70%
发文量
97
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书