Self-reported impacts one year after a brief health equity/implicit bias course for academic clinicians.

MedEdPublish (2016) Pub Date : 2025-12-17 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.12688/mep.20799.2
Janice Sabin, Grace Guenther, Kris Piu Kwan Ma, Bernadette York, Wendy Barrington, Bianca Frogner
{"title":"Self-reported impacts one year after a brief health equity/implicit bias course for academic clinicians.","authors":"Janice Sabin, Grace Guenther, Kris Piu Kwan Ma, Bernadette York, Wendy Barrington, Bianca Frogner","doi":"10.12688/mep.20799.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this study was to explore whether there were lasting effects of brief implicit bias education on clinicians' teaching and practice one year after taking the course and whether implicit and explicit bias was associated with self-reported impact of the course.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This was a mixed-method study. We followed up with a sample of 119 academic clinicians who completed the baseline study December 2019. Recruitment for the current study was conducted between December 2020 and March 2021. Participants responded online to survey questions about whether the course had an impact on their teaching and practice. We categorized qualitative responses to these questions using Prochaska & DiClemente's Stages of Change Model of Behavior Change. Implicit and explicit race and gender bias data were collected at baseline.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Response rate was 47.1% (N=56). Participants were 64.3% female, 66.1% White, 67.9% were Medical Doctors (MD) and 82.1% work in an academic healthcare system. Overall, we found slight implicit pro-White bias (mean= 0.27, SD 0.45, p=<0.001) and male-career gender bias (mean= 0.33, SD 0.31, p=<0.001). Across all four questions 42 unique participants (75.0%) responded to at least one question reporting, \" <i>yes\", the course had an impact on their teaching/mentoring and or practice.</i> Thirty-five (62.5%) participants reported that the course had an impact on their teaching and 23 (41.4%) reported an impact on their clinical practice. Participants reported 35 instances of increased bias awareness and 47 instances of actions taken due to the course. Those who reported no impact of the course on teaching held no implicit race bias, while those who reported actions taken held moderate implicit Pro-White bias.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study found that the majority of study participants reported lasting effects of the course on their teaching and/or practice. Brief implicit bias education can impact clinicians' teaching and practice. .</p>","PeriodicalId":74136,"journal":{"name":"MedEdPublish (2016)","volume":"15 ","pages":"32"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12759272/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MedEdPublish (2016)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12688/mep.20799.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to explore whether there were lasting effects of brief implicit bias education on clinicians' teaching and practice one year after taking the course and whether implicit and explicit bias was associated with self-reported impact of the course.

Method: This was a mixed-method study. We followed up with a sample of 119 academic clinicians who completed the baseline study December 2019. Recruitment for the current study was conducted between December 2020 and March 2021. Participants responded online to survey questions about whether the course had an impact on their teaching and practice. We categorized qualitative responses to these questions using Prochaska & DiClemente's Stages of Change Model of Behavior Change. Implicit and explicit race and gender bias data were collected at baseline.

Results: Response rate was 47.1% (N=56). Participants were 64.3% female, 66.1% White, 67.9% were Medical Doctors (MD) and 82.1% work in an academic healthcare system. Overall, we found slight implicit pro-White bias (mean= 0.27, SD 0.45, p=<0.001) and male-career gender bias (mean= 0.33, SD 0.31, p=<0.001). Across all four questions 42 unique participants (75.0%) responded to at least one question reporting, " yes", the course had an impact on their teaching/mentoring and or practice. Thirty-five (62.5%) participants reported that the course had an impact on their teaching and 23 (41.4%) reported an impact on their clinical practice. Participants reported 35 instances of increased bias awareness and 47 instances of actions taken due to the course. Those who reported no impact of the course on teaching held no implicit race bias, while those who reported actions taken held moderate implicit Pro-White bias.

Conclusions: This study found that the majority of study participants reported lasting effects of the course on their teaching and/or practice. Brief implicit bias education can impact clinicians' teaching and practice. .

在为学术临床医生提供简短的健康公平/内隐偏见课程一年后,自我报告的影响。
目的:本研究的目的是探讨短期内隐偏倚教育对临床医生学习一年后的教学和实践是否有持久的影响,内隐偏倚和外显偏倚是否与课程的自我报告影响有关。方法:采用混合方法进行研究。我们对2019年12月完成基线研究的119名学术临床医生进行了随访。本研究的招募于2020年12月至2021年3月进行。参与者在网上回答了关于课程是否对他们的教学和实践产生影响的调查问题。我们使用Prochaska & DiClemente的行为变化阶段模型对这些问题的定性回答进行了分类。在基线时收集内隐和外显种族和性别偏见数据。结果:有效率为47.1% (N=56)。参与者中64.3%为女性,66.1%为白人,67.9%为医学博士(MD), 82.1%在学术医疗保健系统工作。总体而言,我们发现轻微的内隐亲白人偏见(mean= 0.27, SD = 0.45, p=yes),课程对他们的教学/指导和/或实践有影响。35名(62.5%)参与者报告该课程对他们的教学有影响,23名(41.4%)参与者报告对他们的临床实践有影响。参与者报告了35个偏见意识增强的例子和47个由于课程而采取行动的例子。那些报告课程对教学没有影响的人没有隐性种族偏见,而那些报告采取了行动的人则有适度的隐性亲白人偏见。结论:本研究发现,大多数研究参与者报告了该课程对他们的教学和/或实践的持久影响。短期内隐偏见教育可以影响临床医生的教学和实践。 。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
2 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书