Estimating the Value of Combination Vaccines: A Methodological Framework.

IF 4.6 3区 医学 Q1 ECONOMICS
PharmacoEconomics Pub Date : 2026-05-01 Epub Date: 2026-01-04 DOI:10.1007/s40273-025-01575-z
Mark Jit, Allison Portnoy, Clint Pecenka, William P Hausdorff, Christopher Gill
{"title":"Estimating the Value of Combination Vaccines: A Methodological Framework.","authors":"Mark Jit, Allison Portnoy, Clint Pecenka, William P Hausdorff, Christopher Gill","doi":"10.1007/s40273-025-01575-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Combination vaccines combine several components in a single dose administration. They offer programmatic and public health advantages, particularly as vaccine schedules become increasingly crowded. They are often more expensive to develop and produce, which discourages manufacturer investment without clear market signals. Hence their benefits need to be captured with existing health economic evaluation reference cases used by decision-makers to guide vaccine investments. We propose that the value of combination vaccines can be captured through at least four domains: (1) reductions in tangible and intangible costs to caregivers, (2) operational efficiencies to the health system, (3) opportunity costs of vaccine schedule slots, and (4) more streamlined vaccine schedules. We demonstrate the practicality of our framework by comparing the value of introducing a hypothetical vaccine to a crowded schedule as a standalone formulation, a replacement for a vaccine already in the schedule, or a combination product. The framework could also be applied to estimate the value of reducing the number of separate administrations needed for a standalone vaccine. Applying it in real-world situations could be facilitated by further data collection, particularly on collating results on the value of existing vaccines in the schedule and estimating willingness-to-pay for fewer vaccine administrations.</p>","PeriodicalId":19807,"journal":{"name":"PharmacoEconomics","volume":" ","pages":"517-526"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13110238/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PharmacoEconomics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40273-025-01575-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Combination vaccines combine several components in a single dose administration. They offer programmatic and public health advantages, particularly as vaccine schedules become increasingly crowded. They are often more expensive to develop and produce, which discourages manufacturer investment without clear market signals. Hence their benefits need to be captured with existing health economic evaluation reference cases used by decision-makers to guide vaccine investments. We propose that the value of combination vaccines can be captured through at least four domains: (1) reductions in tangible and intangible costs to caregivers, (2) operational efficiencies to the health system, (3) opportunity costs of vaccine schedule slots, and (4) more streamlined vaccine schedules. We demonstrate the practicality of our framework by comparing the value of introducing a hypothetical vaccine to a crowded schedule as a standalone formulation, a replacement for a vaccine already in the schedule, or a combination product. The framework could also be applied to estimate the value of reducing the number of separate administrations needed for a standalone vaccine. Applying it in real-world situations could be facilitated by further data collection, particularly on collating results on the value of existing vaccines in the schedule and estimating willingness-to-pay for fewer vaccine administrations.

评估联合疫苗的价值:一个方法学框架。
联合疫苗在一次给药中结合了几种成分。它们在规划和公共卫生方面具有优势,特别是在疫苗接种计划日益拥挤的情况下。它们的开发和生产成本往往更高,这在没有明确市场信号的情况下阻碍了制造商的投资。因此,需要利用决策者用来指导疫苗投资的现有卫生经济评价参考案例来了解它们的益处。我们建议,联合疫苗的价值可以通过至少四个领域来体现:(1)减少护理人员的有形和无形成本,(2)提高卫生系统的运营效率,(3)疫苗计划时段的机会成本,以及(4)更精简的疫苗计划。我们通过比较在拥挤的时间表中引入一种假设疫苗作为独立制剂、替代计划中已有疫苗或组合产品的价值,来证明我们框架的实用性。该框架还可用于估计减少独立疫苗所需的单独管理次数的价值。通过进一步收集数据,特别是在核对计划中现有疫苗价值的结果和估计为减少疫苗接种而付费的意愿方面,可以促进在实际情况中应用该方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
PharmacoEconomics
PharmacoEconomics 医学-药学
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
9.10%
发文量
85
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: PharmacoEconomics is the benchmark journal for peer-reviewed, authoritative and practical articles on the application of pharmacoeconomics and quality-of-life assessment to optimum drug therapy and health outcomes. An invaluable source of applied pharmacoeconomic original research and educational material for the healthcare decision maker. PharmacoEconomics is dedicated to the clear communication of complex pharmacoeconomic issues related to patient care and drug utilization. PharmacoEconomics offers a range of additional features designed to increase the visibility, readership and educational value of the journal’s content. Each article is accompanied by a Key Points summary, giving a time-efficient overview of the content to a wide readership. Articles may be accompanied by plain language summaries to assist readers who have some knowledge of, but not in-depth expertise in, the area to understand the scientific content and overall implications of the article.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书