Palliative resection versus palliative stenting for intestinal obstruction in patients with metastatic left-sided colonic cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis.

IF 2.1 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Annals of Coloproctology Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-12-29 DOI:10.3393/ac.2025.00535.0076
Ruby Siu Ting Lau, Sophie Sok Fei Hon, Man Fung Ho, Simon Chu, Dennis Ck Ng, Simon Sm Ng
{"title":"Palliative resection versus palliative stenting for intestinal obstruction in patients with metastatic left-sided colonic cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis.","authors":"Ruby Siu Ting Lau, Sophie Sok Fei Hon, Man Fung Ho, Simon Chu, Dennis Ck Ng, Simon Sm Ng","doi":"10.3393/ac.2025.00535.0076","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Palliative resection and palliative stenting are established options for managing obstruction in patients with metastatic left-sided colonic cancer. This retrospective study investigated the long-term outcomes and survival associated with each treatment modality.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with left-sided colon cancer complicated by intestinal obstruction and unresectable metastatic lesions were included. Propensity score matching was conducted to balance demographic characteristics. The primary outcome was long-term survival. Secondary outcomes included short-term morbidity, length of hospital stay, clinical success rate, stoma formation rate, and number of readmissions due to tumor-related complications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Initially, 131 patients who underwent palliative resection or stenting between 2015 and 2022 were included. After propensity score matching, 98 patients remained (49 in each group). Survival was significantly better among patients receiving palliative resection compared to stenting (median, 19.6 months vs. 9.6 months; P=0.003). However, subgroup analysis for patients older than 70 years demonstrated no statistically significant survival benefit (median, 11.5 months vs. 10.2 months; P=0.240). The resection group experienced significantly higher rates of stoma formation and longer postoperative hospital stays. Readmission rates were similar. Cox regression analysis identified low carcinoembryonic antigen levels, tumor resection, chemotherapy, and targeted therapy as independent predictors of longer survival.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>For metastatic colon cancer patients presenting with intestinal obstruction, palliative resection may offer a survival advantage. However, this benefit diminishes in patients over 70 years of age. Additionally, resection is associated with a higher rate of stoma formation. Therefore, individualized treatment decisions are warranted when choosing between palliative resection and palliative stenting in metastatic colonic cancer patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":8267,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Coloproctology","volume":"41 6","pages":"528-536"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12766391/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Coloproctology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2025.00535.0076","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/12/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Palliative resection and palliative stenting are established options for managing obstruction in patients with metastatic left-sided colonic cancer. This retrospective study investigated the long-term outcomes and survival associated with each treatment modality.

Methods: Patients with left-sided colon cancer complicated by intestinal obstruction and unresectable metastatic lesions were included. Propensity score matching was conducted to balance demographic characteristics. The primary outcome was long-term survival. Secondary outcomes included short-term morbidity, length of hospital stay, clinical success rate, stoma formation rate, and number of readmissions due to tumor-related complications.

Results: Initially, 131 patients who underwent palliative resection or stenting between 2015 and 2022 were included. After propensity score matching, 98 patients remained (49 in each group). Survival was significantly better among patients receiving palliative resection compared to stenting (median, 19.6 months vs. 9.6 months; P=0.003). However, subgroup analysis for patients older than 70 years demonstrated no statistically significant survival benefit (median, 11.5 months vs. 10.2 months; P=0.240). The resection group experienced significantly higher rates of stoma formation and longer postoperative hospital stays. Readmission rates were similar. Cox regression analysis identified low carcinoembryonic antigen levels, tumor resection, chemotherapy, and targeted therapy as independent predictors of longer survival.

Conclusion: For metastatic colon cancer patients presenting with intestinal obstruction, palliative resection may offer a survival advantage. However, this benefit diminishes in patients over 70 years of age. Additionally, resection is associated with a higher rate of stoma formation. Therefore, individualized treatment decisions are warranted when choosing between palliative resection and palliative stenting in metastatic colonic cancer patients.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

转移性左侧结肠癌患者的姑息性切除与姑息性支架置入治疗肠梗阻:倾向评分匹配分析。
目的:姑息性切除和姑息性支架植入术是治疗转移性左侧结肠癌患者梗阻的既定选择。这项回顾性研究调查了与每种治疗方式相关的长期结果和生存率。方法:左侧结肠癌合并肠梗阻及不可切除转移灶患者。进行倾向得分匹配以平衡人口统计学特征。主要终点是长期生存。次要结局包括短期发病率、住院时间、临床成功率、造口率和因肿瘤相关并发症再入院的次数。结果:最初纳入了2015年至2022年间接受姑息性切除或支架置入的131例患者。倾向评分匹配后,剩余98例患者(每组49例)。与支架置入术相比,接受姑息性切除的患者的生存期明显更好(中位数,19.6个月vs 9.6个月;P=0.003)。然而,年龄大于70岁的患者的亚组分析显示,没有统计学上显著的生存获益(中位数,11.5个月vs 10.2个月;P=0.240)。切除组有明显更高的造口率和更长的术后住院时间。再入院率相似。Cox回归分析发现,低癌胚抗原水平、肿瘤切除、化疗和靶向治疗是延长生存期的独立预测因素。结论:对于以肠梗阻为表现的转移性结肠癌患者,姑息性切除可能提供生存优势。然而,这种益处在70岁以上的患者中减弱。此外,切除与更高的造口率相关。因此,在转移性结肠癌患者的姑息性切除和姑息性支架置入术之间进行选择时,个性化的治疗决定是必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
3.20%
发文量
73
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书