Impact of Surgical Masks on Newborns' Spontaneous Face Processing Skills

IF 2.4 2区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL
Infancy Pub Date : 2026-01-03 DOI:10.1111/infa.70064
Caroline Bertrand, Marie Chevallier, Althéa Fratacci, Joan Birulés, Cristina-Ioana Galusca, Jérémie Josse, Olivier Pascalis, Mathilde Fort
{"title":"Impact of Surgical Masks on Newborns' Spontaneous Face Processing Skills","authors":"Caroline Bertrand,&nbsp;Marie Chevallier,&nbsp;Althéa Fratacci,&nbsp;Joan Birulés,&nbsp;Cristina-Ioana Galusca,&nbsp;Jérémie Josse,&nbsp;Olivier Pascalis,&nbsp;Mathilde Fort","doi":"10.1111/infa.70064","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>At birth, newborns prefer upright faces over other stimuli, indicating that they already pay specific attention to facial internal features, with expectations about their featural configuration. The study investigated whether surgical mask wearing in maternity wards due to COVID-19 disrupts newborns' face processing. Using a visual preference paradigm, newborns saw paired images of the same face. In Condition 1, both faces were upright, one masked, one unmasked. No preference was found. In Condition 2, newborns saw an upright masked face versus the same masked face but inverted (i.e., upside down), showing a preference for the upright version. Findings suggest that masked and unmasked static faces equally attract newborns' attention and that surgical masks do not disrupt their face configuration processing. It has implications for recommendations to the general public, especially individuals in contact with newborns.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47895,"journal":{"name":"Infancy","volume":"31 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infancy","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/infa.70064","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

At birth, newborns prefer upright faces over other stimuli, indicating that they already pay specific attention to facial internal features, with expectations about their featural configuration. The study investigated whether surgical mask wearing in maternity wards due to COVID-19 disrupts newborns' face processing. Using a visual preference paradigm, newborns saw paired images of the same face. In Condition 1, both faces were upright, one masked, one unmasked. No preference was found. In Condition 2, newborns saw an upright masked face versus the same masked face but inverted (i.e., upside down), showing a preference for the upright version. Findings suggest that masked and unmasked static faces equally attract newborns' attention and that surgical masks do not disrupt their face configuration processing. It has implications for recommendations to the general public, especially individuals in contact with newborns.

外科口罩对新生儿自发性面部加工技能的影响
出生时,新生儿更喜欢直立的脸而不是其他刺激物,这表明他们已经特别关注面部内部特征,并对他们的特征配置抱有期望。该研究调查了因COVID-19而在产科病房佩戴外科口罩是否会干扰新生儿的面部处理。使用视觉偏好范式,新生儿看到同一张脸的成对图像。在条件一中,两张脸都是直立的,一张戴着面具,一张不戴面具。没有发现偏好。在条件2中,新生儿看到的是一张直立的蒙面脸,而不是同样的蒙面脸,但是倒置的(即倒扣),显示出对直立版本的偏好。研究结果表明,戴口罩和不戴口罩的静态面孔同样能吸引新生儿的注意力,而且外科口罩不会干扰他们对面部结构的处理。它对向公众,特别是与新生儿接触的个人提出建议具有启示意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Infancy
Infancy PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL-
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
7.70%
发文量
72
期刊介绍: Infancy, the official journal of the International Society on Infant Studies, emphasizes the highest quality original research on normal and aberrant infant development during the first two years. Both human and animal research are included. In addition to regular length research articles and brief reports (3000-word maximum), the journal includes solicited target articles along with a series of commentaries; debates, in which different theoretical positions are presented along with a series of commentaries; and thematic collections, a group of three to five reports or summaries of research on the same issue, conducted independently at different laboratories, with invited commentaries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书