Comprehensive unit-based safety program in practice: high reliability organising, patient safety and organisational human factors in Victoria's public healthcare system - a qualitative study.

IF 1.8 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Clare McCarthy, Bill Shearer, Katharine See, Elizabeth Austin, Robyn Clay-Williams
{"title":"Comprehensive unit-based safety program in practice: high reliability organising, patient safety and organisational human factors in Victoria's public healthcare system - a qualitative study.","authors":"Clare McCarthy, Bill Shearer, Katharine See, Elizabeth Austin, Robyn Clay-Williams","doi":"10.1108/LHS-03-2025-0044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aims to explore organisational human factors in implementing and evaluating the Comprehensive Unit-based Safety Program (CUSP) as part of a high reliability organisations (HROs) framework for improving patient safety in a public hospital setting in Victoria, Australia.</p><p><strong>Design/methodology/approach: </strong>A qualitative study using semi-structured interviews with 15 participants from seven CUSPs was conducted. Participants represented diverse clinical and non-clinical roles, selected based on program maturity and availability. Data were collected between August 2022 and March 2023, with thematic analysis using deductive and inductive coding. Reflexive practices, including transcript verification and peer debriefing, ensured rigour.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>CUSP emerged as vital for fostering leadership, accountability, teamwork and psychological safety - pillars of a robust safety culture. Thematic analysis revealed three core themes: HRO Principles, Organisational Human Factors and Quality and Safety. CUSP's integration of timely, actionable safety data enhanced teamwork, flattened hierarchies and drove collaborative improvements in patient safety. By blending technical and adaptive elements, the program cultivated a proactive safety culture. These findings emphasise embedding human factors and leadership into safety programs while identifying a need for further research into CUSP's scalability and long-term impact.</p><p><strong>Practical implications: </strong>CUSP's adaptable, data-driven approach can embed patient safety into organisational practices. Healthcare organisations can leverage this study's insights to prioritise leadership, promote psychological safety and ensure data accessibility for staff.</p><p><strong>Originality/value: </strong>To the best of the authors' knowledge, this is the first Australian study to examine CUSP within a HRO context, highlighting how leadership and teamwork underpin safety program success in public healthcare.</p>","PeriodicalId":46165,"journal":{"name":"Leadership in Health Services","volume":" ","pages":"187-201"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Leadership in Health Services","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/LHS-03-2025-0044","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study aims to explore organisational human factors in implementing and evaluating the Comprehensive Unit-based Safety Program (CUSP) as part of a high reliability organisations (HROs) framework for improving patient safety in a public hospital setting in Victoria, Australia.

Design/methodology/approach: A qualitative study using semi-structured interviews with 15 participants from seven CUSPs was conducted. Participants represented diverse clinical and non-clinical roles, selected based on program maturity and availability. Data were collected between August 2022 and March 2023, with thematic analysis using deductive and inductive coding. Reflexive practices, including transcript verification and peer debriefing, ensured rigour.

Findings: CUSP emerged as vital for fostering leadership, accountability, teamwork and psychological safety - pillars of a robust safety culture. Thematic analysis revealed three core themes: HRO Principles, Organisational Human Factors and Quality and Safety. CUSP's integration of timely, actionable safety data enhanced teamwork, flattened hierarchies and drove collaborative improvements in patient safety. By blending technical and adaptive elements, the program cultivated a proactive safety culture. These findings emphasise embedding human factors and leadership into safety programs while identifying a need for further research into CUSP's scalability and long-term impact.

Practical implications: CUSP's adaptable, data-driven approach can embed patient safety into organisational practices. Healthcare organisations can leverage this study's insights to prioritise leadership, promote psychological safety and ensure data accessibility for staff.

Originality/value: To the best of the authors' knowledge, this is the first Australian study to examine CUSP within a HRO context, highlighting how leadership and teamwork underpin safety program success in public healthcare.

综合单位为基础的安全方案在实践:高可靠性组织,患者安全和组织人为因素在维多利亚州的公共医疗保健系统-定性研究。
目的:本研究旨在探讨实施和评估综合单位安全计划(CUSP)作为高可靠性组织(HROs)框架的一部分的组织人为因素,以提高澳大利亚维多利亚州公立医院的患者安全。设计/方法/方法:采用半结构化访谈对来自7个cusp的15名参与者进行了定性研究。参与者代表不同的临床和非临床角色,根据项目的成熟度和可用性进行选择。数据收集时间为2022年8月至2023年3月,使用演绎和归纳编码进行主题分析。反思性实践,包括抄本核查和同行汇报,确保了严谨性。研究结果:CUSP对培养领导力、责任感、团队合作和心理安全至关重要,这些都是强大的安全文化的支柱。专题分析揭示了三个核心主题:人力资源管理原则、组织人为因素和质量与安全。CUSP整合了及时、可操作的安全数据,加强了团队合作,平平化了层次结构,推动了患者安全的协作改进。通过融合技术和适应性元素,该项目培养了一种积极主动的安全文化。这些发现强调了将人为因素和领导力纳入安全计划,同时确定了对CUSP的可扩展性和长期影响进行进一步研究的必要性。实际意义:CUSP的适应性强,数据驱动的方法可以将患者安全纳入组织实践。医疗保健组织可以利用这项研究的见解来优先考虑领导力,促进心理安全,并确保员工的数据可访问性。原创性/价值:据作者所知,这是澳大利亚第一个在人力资源管理办公室背景下研究CUSP的研究,强调了领导力和团队合作如何支撑公共医疗保健安全计划的成功。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Leadership in Health Services
Leadership in Health Services HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
17.60%
发文量
51
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书