Estimating Public Knowledge About Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Insomnia (CBT-I) and Alternative Treatments.

IF 1.6 3区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Behavioral Sleep Medicine Pub Date : 2026-05-01 Epub Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.1080/15402002.2025.2610674
Arash Assar, Jamie Walker, Mara Egeler, Veronica Floyd, Harrison Dickens, Ivan Vargas
{"title":"Estimating Public Knowledge About Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Insomnia (CBT-I) and Alternative Treatments.","authors":"Arash Assar, Jamie Walker, Mara Egeler, Veronica Floyd, Harrison Dickens, Ivan Vargas","doi":"10.1080/15402002.2025.2610674","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study assessed public knowledge about insomnia treatments, particularly Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Insomnia (CBT-I), and examined whether familiarity varied by gender or race. The primary aim was to quantify what proportion of adults in the United States are familiar with and use CBT-I.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A nationally representative sample of 3080 U.S. adults (<i>M<sub>age</sub> </i>= 39.5 years, <i>SD<sub>age</sub> </i>= 12.9) was surveyed. Approximately 48.3% identified as women. Participants reported their familiarity with various insomnia treatments, including pharmacological and behavioral options, and whether they had used prescription medications, over-the-counter sleep aids, or CBT-I within the past year or at any point in their lifetime.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants were substantially more familiar with pharmacological treatments than behavioral therapies, with notably low recognition of CBT-I. Treatment utilization patterns supported that people tend to have a greater reliance on pharmacological interventions, particularly over-the-counter options, than CBT-I. Demographic differences emerged, with women and White participants reporting greater awareness of insomnia treatments than men and individuals from other racial groups. Age related differences were also observed, though, these varied by treatment approach.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study identified major gaps in public awareness of CBT-I and highlighted disparities in treatment knowledge. Addressing these gaps is critical for improving treatment access and promoting CBT-I as a first-line, evidence-based treatment for insomnia.</p>","PeriodicalId":55393,"journal":{"name":"Behavioral Sleep Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"330-345"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12797138/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavioral Sleep Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15402002.2025.2610674","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This study assessed public knowledge about insomnia treatments, particularly Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Insomnia (CBT-I), and examined whether familiarity varied by gender or race. The primary aim was to quantify what proportion of adults in the United States are familiar with and use CBT-I.

Methods: A nationally representative sample of 3080 U.S. adults (Mage= 39.5 years, SDage= 12.9) was surveyed. Approximately 48.3% identified as women. Participants reported their familiarity with various insomnia treatments, including pharmacological and behavioral options, and whether they had used prescription medications, over-the-counter sleep aids, or CBT-I within the past year or at any point in their lifetime.

Results: Participants were substantially more familiar with pharmacological treatments than behavioral therapies, with notably low recognition of CBT-I. Treatment utilization patterns supported that people tend to have a greater reliance on pharmacological interventions, particularly over-the-counter options, than CBT-I. Demographic differences emerged, with women and White participants reporting greater awareness of insomnia treatments than men and individuals from other racial groups. Age related differences were also observed, though, these varied by treatment approach.

Conclusions: This study identified major gaps in public awareness of CBT-I and highlighted disparities in treatment knowledge. Addressing these gaps is critical for improving treatment access and promoting CBT-I as a first-line, evidence-based treatment for insomnia.

估计公众对失眠症认知行为疗法(CBT-I)和替代疗法的了解。
目的:本研究评估了公众对失眠治疗的认识,特别是对失眠的认知行为疗法(CBT-I)的认识,并检查了熟悉程度是否因性别或种族而异。主要目的是量化美国成年人熟悉和使用CBT-I的比例。方法:选取3080名美国人作为全国代表性样本成人(年龄39.5岁,年龄12.9岁)。大约48.3%的人被认为是女性。参与者报告了他们对各种失眠治疗方法的熟悉程度,包括药理学和行为选择,以及他们是否在过去一年或一生中的任何时候使用过处方药、非处方睡眠辅助药物或CBT-I。结果:参与者对药物治疗比行为治疗更熟悉,对CBT-I的认知度明显较低。治疗利用模式支持人们更倾向于依赖药物干预,特别是非处方选择,而不是CBT-I。人口统计学上的差异出现了,女性和白人参与者比男性和其他种族的人更了解失眠治疗。年龄相关的差异也被观察到,尽管这些差异因治疗方法而异。结论:本研究确定了公众对CBT-I认知的主要差距,并强调了治疗知识的差异。解决这些差距对于改善治疗可及性和促进CBT-I作为失眠的一线循证治疗至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Behavioral Sleep Medicine
Behavioral Sleep Medicine CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-PSYCHIATRY
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
3.20%
发文量
49
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Behavioral Sleep Medicine addresses behavioral dimensions of normal and abnormal sleep mechanisms and the prevention, assessment, and treatment of sleep disorders and associated behavioral and emotional problems. Standards for interventions acceptable to this journal are guided by established principles of behavior change. Intending to serve as the intellectual home for the application of behavioral/cognitive science to the study of normal and disordered sleep, the journal paints a broad stroke across the behavioral sleep medicine landscape. Its content includes scholarly investigation of such areas as normal sleep experience, insomnia, the relation of daytime functioning to sleep, parasomnias, circadian rhythm disorders, treatment adherence, pediatrics, and geriatrics. Multidisciplinary approaches are particularly welcome. The journal’ domain encompasses human basic, applied, and clinical outcome research. Behavioral Sleep Medicine also embraces methodological diversity, spanning innovative case studies, quasi-experimentation, randomized trials, epidemiology, and critical reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书