[Regulation and ban of asbestos in Latin America and the Caribbean: a comparative policy analysis].

Revista de salud publica (Bogota, Colombia) Pub Date : 2025-03-01 eCollection Date: 2025-04-01 DOI:10.15446/rsap.V27n2.118081
Fabio A Escobar-Díaz, Carlos A Orozco-Castaño
{"title":"[Regulation and ban of asbestos in Latin America and the Caribbean: a comparative policy analysis].","authors":"Fabio A Escobar-Díaz, Carlos A Orozco-Castaño","doi":"10.15446/rsap.V27n2.118081","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Asbestos is a mineral used in different industrial activities, but it has a significant impact on the health of the working population. Several countries have established policies to prohibit or regulate its use.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Comparatively characterize public policy measures to prohibit and regulate asbestos in Latin America and the Caribbean.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Qualitative design using the comparative policy analysis method. Documentary sources based on current national standards were consulted and six categories were constructed based on inductive coding.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The comparison between public policies of the countries of the region reflects some relevant aspects such as: scope of the prohibition, multisectoral surveillance organizations and sanctioning actions; conditions and exceptions for asbestos substitution; prevention, monitoring and health care activities; disposal and management of asbestos waste and formulation of specific policies or programs.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Only a small group of countries in the region have a total ban on asbestos, reflecting the international situation. It is important to continue advancing in studies that analyze political processes and evaluations of policy implementation in each country <i>(source: MeSH, NLM).</i></p>","PeriodicalId":520465,"journal":{"name":"Revista de salud publica (Bogota, Colombia)","volume":"27 2","pages":"118081"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12755208/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de salud publica (Bogota, Colombia)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15446/rsap.V27n2.118081","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Asbestos is a mineral used in different industrial activities, but it has a significant impact on the health of the working population. Several countries have established policies to prohibit or regulate its use.

Objective: Comparatively characterize public policy measures to prohibit and regulate asbestos in Latin America and the Caribbean.

Methods: Qualitative design using the comparative policy analysis method. Documentary sources based on current national standards were consulted and six categories were constructed based on inductive coding.

Results: The comparison between public policies of the countries of the region reflects some relevant aspects such as: scope of the prohibition, multisectoral surveillance organizations and sanctioning actions; conditions and exceptions for asbestos substitution; prevention, monitoring and health care activities; disposal and management of asbestos waste and formulation of specific policies or programs.

Conclusions: Only a small group of countries in the region have a total ban on asbestos, reflecting the international situation. It is important to continue advancing in studies that analyze political processes and evaluations of policy implementation in each country (source: MeSH, NLM).

[拉丁美洲和加勒比对石棉的管制和禁止:比较政策分析]。
石棉是一种用于不同工业活动的矿物,但它对工作人口的健康有重大影响。一些国家制定了禁止或管制其使用的政策。目的:比较描述拉丁美洲和加勒比禁止和管制石棉的公共政策措施。方法:采用比较政策分析法进行定性设计。在参考现行国家标准文献资料的基础上,基于归纳编码构建了6个分类。结果:该区域各国公共政策的比较反映了一些相关方面,如:禁止范围、多部门监督组织和制裁行动;石棉替代品的条件和例外;预防、监测和保健活动;石棉废物的处置和管理,并制定具体的政策或计划。结论:该地区只有少数国家全面禁止石棉,反映了国际形势。重要的是继续推进分析每个国家的政治进程和评价政策执行情况的研究工作(资料来源:人口与环境评估系统,国家环境监测系统)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书