Optimal Insurance Pricing and Demands in a Stochastic Stackelberg Differential Game

IF 2.3 4区 经济学 Q2 BUSINESS, FINANCE
Ming Zhou, Shuang Li, Bing Liu
{"title":"Optimal Insurance Pricing and Demands in a Stochastic Stackelberg Differential Game","authors":"Ming Zhou,&nbsp;Shuang Li,&nbsp;Bing Liu","doi":"10.1111/irfi.70057","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>This paper investigates portfolio selection and risk control between individuals and an insurer in a frame of stochastic Stackelberg differential game. In the Stackelberg game, the insurer plays as the leader who determines the price of insurance, and individuals play as the followers deciding how much insurance they should buy. On one hand, we suppose that there are <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mi>n</mi>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>$$ n $$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> homogeneous individuals in the market who can purchase insurance from one insurer. Each individual aims to achieve optimal consumption, insurance, and investment policies while considering premium prices and the performance of financial market. On the other hand, the insurer can adjust premium prices and investment policies in response to the individuals' insurance demands and the performance of financial market. Both individuals and the insurer aim to maximize their expectation of utilities. By employing the dynamic programming principle, we obtain closed-form solutions for optimal policies and value functions. The results show that the correlation between financial market and insurance market has a significant impact on the optimal strategy. A strong negative correlation would lead to an inefficient insurance market, but full insurance demand occurs for strong positive correlated markets. Most interestingly, our result indicates that insurance demand can effectively increase individuals consumption level and investment level on risk assets for positive correlated markets. Finally, we also find the equilibrium insurance price decreases and the equilibrium insurance demand increases with respect to the size of insurance market for positive correlated markets.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":46664,"journal":{"name":"International Review of Finance","volume":"26 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Review of Finance","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/irfi.70057","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper investigates portfolio selection and risk control between individuals and an insurer in a frame of stochastic Stackelberg differential game. In the Stackelberg game, the insurer plays as the leader who determines the price of insurance, and individuals play as the followers deciding how much insurance they should buy. On one hand, we suppose that there are n $$ n $$ homogeneous individuals in the market who can purchase insurance from one insurer. Each individual aims to achieve optimal consumption, insurance, and investment policies while considering premium prices and the performance of financial market. On the other hand, the insurer can adjust premium prices and investment policies in response to the individuals' insurance demands and the performance of financial market. Both individuals and the insurer aim to maximize their expectation of utilities. By employing the dynamic programming principle, we obtain closed-form solutions for optimal policies and value functions. The results show that the correlation between financial market and insurance market has a significant impact on the optimal strategy. A strong negative correlation would lead to an inefficient insurance market, but full insurance demand occurs for strong positive correlated markets. Most interestingly, our result indicates that insurance demand can effectively increase individuals consumption level and investment level on risk assets for positive correlated markets. Finally, we also find the equilibrium insurance price decreases and the equilibrium insurance demand increases with respect to the size of insurance market for positive correlated markets.

随机Stackelberg微分对策中的最优保险定价和需求
本文在随机Stackelberg微分对策框架下研究个人与保险人之间的投资组合选择和风险控制问题。在Stackelberg博弈中,保险公司作为领导者决定保险的价格,个人作为追随者决定他们应该购买多少保险。一方面,我们假设市场上有n个$$ n $$同质个人可以从一家保险公司购买保险。每个人的目标都是在考虑保费和金融市场表现的同时,实现最优的消费、保险和投资政策。另一方面,保险公司可以根据个人的保险需求和金融市场的表现调整保费价格和投资政策。个人和保险公司的目标都是最大化他们对公用事业的期望。利用动态规划原理,得到了最优策略和最优值函数的闭型解。结果表明,金融市场和保险市场的相关性对最优策略有显著影响。强负相关会导致保险市场效率低下,而强正相关市场则会产生充分的保险需求。最有趣的是,我们的研究结果表明,在正相关市场中,保险需求可以有效地提高个人的风险资产消费水平和投资水平。在正相关市场中,均衡保险价格随保险市场规模的增大而减小,均衡保险需求随保险市场规模的增大而增大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Review of Finance
International Review of Finance BUSINESS, FINANCE-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
5.90%
发文量
28
期刊介绍: The International Review of Finance (IRF) publishes high-quality research on all aspects of financial economics, including traditional areas such as asset pricing, corporate finance, market microstructure, financial intermediation and regulation, financial econometrics, financial engineering and risk management, as well as new areas such as markets and institutions of emerging market economies, especially those in the Asia-Pacific region. In addition, the Letters Section in IRF is a premium outlet of letter-length research in all fields of finance. The length of the articles in the Letters Section is limited to a maximum of eight journal pages.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书