Multistep forecasting of state variables in nuclear power plants using deep learning

IF 2.5 3区 工程技术 Q1 NUCLEAR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Nuclear Engineering and Design Pub Date : 2026-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-12-30 DOI:10.1016/j.nucengdes.2025.114731
Marcelo C. Santos , Bernardo M. Caixeta , Andressa S. Nicolau , Cláudio M.N.A. Pereira , Roberto Schirru
{"title":"Multistep forecasting of state variables in nuclear power plants using deep learning","authors":"Marcelo C. Santos ,&nbsp;Bernardo M. Caixeta ,&nbsp;Andressa S. Nicolau ,&nbsp;Cláudio M.N.A. Pereira ,&nbsp;Roberto Schirru","doi":"10.1016/j.nucengdes.2025.114731","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In Nuclear Power Plants (NPPs), most monitoring and diagnostic systems operate based on the principle of Detection and Response (D&amp;R), in which operator actions are triggered only after an anomaly is detected. While effective for real-time monitoring, this approach lacks predictive capability, which is critical for anticipating the evolution of accidents and enhancing operational safety. To address this limitation, this study investigates the use of Deep Learning models for multi-horizon forecasting the temporal behavior of key state variables during normal operation and postulated accident scenarios in nuclear reactors. Two datasets were employed: the LABIHS dataset, composed of simulated time series from a Pressurized Water Reactor (PWR) under a Loss-of-Coolant Accident (LOCA), and the SICA dataset, which contains real operational data from the Angra 1 nuclear power plant. The methodology included data preprocessing and data augmentation using instrumentation noise. Four deep learning architectures were evaluated: Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM), Temporal Convolutional Networks (TCN), Time-series Dense Encoder (TiDE), and Neural Hierarchical Interpolation for Time Series (N-HiTS). These models were trained using a sliding window approach and evaluated across multiple forecasting horizons. Comparative results showed that TCN outperformed LSTM among the classical models, while TiDE and N-HiTS achieved the best overall accuracy and stability across all forecasting horizons. With average MAE values of 1.01 ± 2.39 (LABIHS) and 1.45 ± 1.33 (SICA), these findings confirm the effectiveness of modern Deep Learning architectures for predictive monitoring in nuclear power plant operations.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":19170,"journal":{"name":"Nuclear Engineering and Design","volume":"448 ","pages":"Article 114731"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nuclear Engineering and Design","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0029549325009082","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/12/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NUCLEAR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In Nuclear Power Plants (NPPs), most monitoring and diagnostic systems operate based on the principle of Detection and Response (D&R), in which operator actions are triggered only after an anomaly is detected. While effective for real-time monitoring, this approach lacks predictive capability, which is critical for anticipating the evolution of accidents and enhancing operational safety. To address this limitation, this study investigates the use of Deep Learning models for multi-horizon forecasting the temporal behavior of key state variables during normal operation and postulated accident scenarios in nuclear reactors. Two datasets were employed: the LABIHS dataset, composed of simulated time series from a Pressurized Water Reactor (PWR) under a Loss-of-Coolant Accident (LOCA), and the SICA dataset, which contains real operational data from the Angra 1 nuclear power plant. The methodology included data preprocessing and data augmentation using instrumentation noise. Four deep learning architectures were evaluated: Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM), Temporal Convolutional Networks (TCN), Time-series Dense Encoder (TiDE), and Neural Hierarchical Interpolation for Time Series (N-HiTS). These models were trained using a sliding window approach and evaluated across multiple forecasting horizons. Comparative results showed that TCN outperformed LSTM among the classical models, while TiDE and N-HiTS achieved the best overall accuracy and stability across all forecasting horizons. With average MAE values of 1.01 ± 2.39 (LABIHS) and 1.45 ± 1.33 (SICA), these findings confirm the effectiveness of modern Deep Learning architectures for predictive monitoring in nuclear power plant operations.
基于深度学习的核电厂状态变量多步预测
在核电站(NPPs)中,大多数监测和诊断系统都是基于探测和响应(D&;R)原则运行的,即只有在检测到异常后才触发操作员的操作。虽然这种方法对实时监测是有效的,但它缺乏预测能力,而预测能力对于预测事故的演变和提高运行安全性至关重要。为了解决这一限制,本研究探讨了在核反应堆正常运行和假设事故情景下,使用深度学习模型对关键状态变量的时间行为进行多水平预测。使用了两个数据集:LABIHS数据集,由冷却剂丢失事故(LOCA)下压水堆(PWR)的模拟时间序列组成;SICA数据集,包含来自安格拉1号核电站的真实运行数据。该方法包括使用仪器噪声进行数据预处理和数据增强。评估了四种深度学习架构:长短期记忆(LSTM)、时间卷积网络(TCN)、时间序列密集编码器(TiDE)和时间序列神经分层插值(N-HiTS)。这些模型使用滑动窗口方法进行训练,并在多个预测范围内进行评估。对比结果表明,TCN在经典模型中优于LSTM,而TiDE和N-HiTS在所有预测范围内的总体精度和稳定性最好。平均MAE值为1.01±2.39 (LABIHS)和1.45±1.33 (SICA),这些发现证实了现代深度学习架构在核电厂运行预测监测中的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nuclear Engineering and Design
Nuclear Engineering and Design 工程技术-核科学技术
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
11.80%
发文量
377
审稿时长
5 months
期刊介绍: Nuclear Engineering and Design covers the wide range of disciplines involved in the engineering, design, safety and construction of nuclear fission reactors. The Editors welcome papers both on applied and innovative aspects and developments in nuclear science and technology. Fundamentals of Reactor Design include: • Thermal-Hydraulics and Core Physics • Safety Analysis, Risk Assessment (PSA) • Structural and Mechanical Engineering • Materials Science • Fuel Behavior and Design • Structural Plant Design • Engineering of Reactor Components • Experiments Aspects beyond fundamentals of Reactor Design covered: • Accident Mitigation Measures • Reactor Control Systems • Licensing Issues • Safeguard Engineering • Economy of Plants • Reprocessing / Waste Disposal • Applications of Nuclear Energy • Maintenance • Decommissioning Papers on new reactor ideas and developments (Generation IV reactors) such as inherently safe modular HTRs, High Performance LWRs/HWRs and LMFBs/GFR will be considered; Actinide Burners, Accelerator Driven Systems, Energy Amplifiers and other special designs of power and research reactors and their applications are also encouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书