Machine learning prediction of germline BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants in patients with ovarian cancer.

IF 6.2 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Giovanni Innella, Giulia Erini, Antonio De Leo, Lea Godino, Luca Caramanna, Simona Ferrari, Sara Miccoli, Anna Myriam Perrone, Claudio Zamagni, Pierandrea De Iaco, Daniela Turchetti, Paola Rucci
{"title":"Machine learning prediction of germline <i>BRCA1/2</i> pathogenic variants in patients with ovarian cancer.","authors":"Giovanni Innella, Giulia Erini, Antonio De Leo, Lea Godino, Luca Caramanna, Simona Ferrari, Sara Miccoli, Anna Myriam Perrone, Claudio Zamagni, Pierandrea De Iaco, Daniela Turchetti, Paola Rucci","doi":"10.1136/bmjhci-2025-101751","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To assess the performance of machine learning (ML) algorithms to predict the presence of germline <i>BRCA1/2</i> pathogenic variants in ovarian cancer (OC) patients based on clinical-pathological features.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Clinical-pathological features of 648 patients with OC tested for <i>BRCA1/2</i> were analysed using three supervised ML algorithms: random forest, boosting and support vector machine.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the 'test' sample, boosting proved to be the most effective algorithm (accuracy: 84.5%; precision: 80.0%; recall: 3.1%; area under the curve (AUC): 78.8%), followed by support vector machine (accuracy: 81.4%; precision: 72.7%; recall: 27.6%; AUC: 62.3%) and random forest (accuracy: 74.4%; precision: 55.6%; recall: 14.7%; AUC: 71.3%). In the 'validation' sample, accuracy was 79.8% for boosting, 81.7% for support vector machine, 80.8% for random forest.In the most effective algorithm (boosting), family history of OC showed the highest relative influence (52.9), followed by histotype (19.5), personal history of breast cancer (BC) (17.1), age at diagnosis (8.4) and family history of BC (2.2), while Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage had no influence.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>We identified the predictive algorithm that best estimates the a priori likelihood of being a carrier of germline <i>BRCA1/2</i> pathogenic variants in patients with OC. These findings support a role for ML approaches in predicting <i>BRCA1/2</i> status in patients with OC, but accuracy and precision are still suboptimal for clinical use, suggesting the need for additional research.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Results support the selection of relevant clinical features for predictive purposes, which could have significant implications for the clinical management of patients with OC.</p>","PeriodicalId":9050,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Health & Care Informatics","volume":"32 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12766824/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Health & Care Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjhci-2025-101751","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To assess the performance of machine learning (ML) algorithms to predict the presence of germline BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants in ovarian cancer (OC) patients based on clinical-pathological features.

Methods: Clinical-pathological features of 648 patients with OC tested for BRCA1/2 were analysed using three supervised ML algorithms: random forest, boosting and support vector machine.

Results: In the 'test' sample, boosting proved to be the most effective algorithm (accuracy: 84.5%; precision: 80.0%; recall: 3.1%; area under the curve (AUC): 78.8%), followed by support vector machine (accuracy: 81.4%; precision: 72.7%; recall: 27.6%; AUC: 62.3%) and random forest (accuracy: 74.4%; precision: 55.6%; recall: 14.7%; AUC: 71.3%). In the 'validation' sample, accuracy was 79.8% for boosting, 81.7% for support vector machine, 80.8% for random forest.In the most effective algorithm (boosting), family history of OC showed the highest relative influence (52.9), followed by histotype (19.5), personal history of breast cancer (BC) (17.1), age at diagnosis (8.4) and family history of BC (2.2), while Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage had no influence.

Discussion: We identified the predictive algorithm that best estimates the a priori likelihood of being a carrier of germline BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants in patients with OC. These findings support a role for ML approaches in predicting BRCA1/2 status in patients with OC, but accuracy and precision are still suboptimal for clinical use, suggesting the need for additional research.

Conclusions: Results support the selection of relevant clinical features for predictive purposes, which could have significant implications for the clinical management of patients with OC.

机器学习预测卵巢癌患者种系BRCA1/2致病变异。
目的:评估机器学习(ML)算法在卵巢癌(OC)患者中基于临床病理特征预测种系BRCA1/2致病变异的表现。方法:采用随机森林、增强和支持向量机三种有监督机器学习算法对648例经BRCA1/2基因检测的OC患者的临床病理特征进行分析。结果:在“测试”样本中,增强被证明是最有效的算法(准确率:84.5%,精度:80.0%,召回率:3.1%,曲线下面积(AUC): 78.8%),其次是支持向量机(准确率:81.4%,精度:72.7%,召回率:27.6%,AUC: 62.3%)和随机森林(准确率:74.4%,精度:55.6%,召回率:14.7%,AUC: 71.3%)。在“验证”样本中,boosting的准确率为79.8%,支持向量机的准确率为81.7%,随机森林的准确率为80.8%。在最有效的算法(boosting)中,OC家族史的相对影响最大(52.9),其次是组织类型(19.5)、乳腺癌个人史(17.1)、诊断年龄(8.4)和BC家族史(2.2),而妇产联合会分期没有影响。讨论:我们确定了预测算法,该算法最好地估计了OC患者作为种系BRCA1/2致病变异携带者的先验可能性。这些发现支持ML方法在预测OC患者BRCA1/2状态中的作用,但准确性和精度在临床应用中仍不理想,表明需要进一步的研究。结论:结果支持选择相关临床特征进行预测,这可能对OC患者的临床管理具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
4.90%
发文量
40
审稿时长
18 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书