Development of machine learning models to predict risk of hospitalisation and 90-day readmission among patients with cardiovascular risk factors using community health survey data.

IF 6.2 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Arinze Nkemdirim Okere, Tianfeng Li, Md Mohaimenul Islam, Askal A Ali, Sarah G Buxbaum, Vakaramoko Diaby
{"title":"Development of machine learning models to predict risk of hospitalisation and 90-day readmission among patients with cardiovascular risk factors using community health survey data.","authors":"Arinze Nkemdirim Okere, Tianfeng Li, Md Mohaimenul Islam, Askal A Ali, Sarah G Buxbaum, Vakaramoko Diaby","doi":"10.1136/bmjhci-2025-101742","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to develop and validate machine learning (ML) models to predict all-cause hospital admissions and 90-day readmissions using structured, patient-reported survey data.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional survey was conducted between 3 July 2021 and 18 December 2022, among US adults aged ≥18 years with at least one cardiovascular risk factor. Participants were recruited through social media, community pharmacies and outpatient clinics. The final sample included 1318 participants. Primary outcomes were any all-cause hospitalisation and readmission within 90 days. Eight supervised ML models were trained using an 80:20 train-test split and 10-fold cross-validation. Model performance was evaluated using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), precision, recall, F1 score and calibration metrics. SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) values identified key predictors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 1318 participants, 35.0% reported at least one hospitalisation and 10.4% reported a 90-day readmission. The Extra Trees (ET) model demonstrated the best performance across both outcomes. For hospitalisation, ET achieved an AUROC of 0.93, precision of 0.83 and recall of 0.87. For readmission, AUROC was 0.99 with precision of 0.95 and recall of 0.96. SHAP analysis identified heart disease, medication burden, race/ethnicity, employment and insurance status as the most influential predictors.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Patient-reported data reflecting behavioural, social and clinical factors can predict hospitalisations with high accuracy, complementing traditional EHR-based models.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Integrating such patient-reported and behavioural data into electronic health records could enable earlier identification of high-risk individuals and support targeted, preventive interventions to improve healthcare outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":9050,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Health & Care Informatics","volume":"32 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12766757/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Health & Care Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjhci-2025-101742","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to develop and validate machine learning (ML) models to predict all-cause hospital admissions and 90-day readmissions using structured, patient-reported survey data.

Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted between 3 July 2021 and 18 December 2022, among US adults aged ≥18 years with at least one cardiovascular risk factor. Participants were recruited through social media, community pharmacies and outpatient clinics. The final sample included 1318 participants. Primary outcomes were any all-cause hospitalisation and readmission within 90 days. Eight supervised ML models were trained using an 80:20 train-test split and 10-fold cross-validation. Model performance was evaluated using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), precision, recall, F1 score and calibration metrics. SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) values identified key predictors.

Results: Among 1318 participants, 35.0% reported at least one hospitalisation and 10.4% reported a 90-day readmission. The Extra Trees (ET) model demonstrated the best performance across both outcomes. For hospitalisation, ET achieved an AUROC of 0.93, precision of 0.83 and recall of 0.87. For readmission, AUROC was 0.99 with precision of 0.95 and recall of 0.96. SHAP analysis identified heart disease, medication burden, race/ethnicity, employment and insurance status as the most influential predictors.

Discussion: Patient-reported data reflecting behavioural, social and clinical factors can predict hospitalisations with high accuracy, complementing traditional EHR-based models.

Conclusions: Integrating such patient-reported and behavioural data into electronic health records could enable earlier identification of high-risk individuals and support targeted, preventive interventions to improve healthcare outcomes.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

开发机器学习模型,利用社区健康调查数据预测心血管危险因素患者的住院风险和90天再入院风险。
目的:本研究旨在开发和验证机器学习(ML)模型,利用结构化的、患者报告的调查数据预测全因住院和90天再入院。方法:在2021年7月3日至2022年12月18日期间对年龄≥18岁且至少有一种心血管危险因素的美国成年人进行横断面调查。参与者是通过社交媒体、社区药房和门诊诊所招募的。最终样本包括1318名参与者。主要结局为90天内任何全因住院和再入院。使用80:20训练测试分割和10倍交叉验证来训练8个有监督的ML模型。使用受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUROC)、精度、召回率、F1评分和校准指标来评估模型的性能。SHapley加性解释(SHAP)值确定了关键的预测因子。结果:在1318名参与者中,35.0%报告至少一次住院治疗,10.4%报告90天再入院。额外树(ET)模型在两种结果中均表现出最佳性能。对于住院治疗,ET的AUROC为0.93,精度为0.83,召回率为0.87。再入院AUROC为0.99,精密度为0.95,召回率为0.96。SHAP分析确定心脏病、药物负担、种族/民族、就业和保险状况是最具影响力的预测因素。讨论:反映行为、社会和临床因素的患者报告数据可以高精度地预测住院情况,补充了传统的基于电子病历的模型。结论:将此类患者报告和行为数据整合到电子健康记录中,可以更早地识别高风险个体,并支持有针对性的预防性干预措施,以改善医疗保健结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
4.90%
发文量
40
审稿时长
18 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书