Safety of omitting pelvic imaging in patients with stage I germ cell tumor (GCT) on surveillance: A multi-institutional study

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Hamed Ahmadi , Tarik Benidir , Alon Lazarovich , Lynn Anson-Cartwright , Martin O’Malley , Scott E. Eggener , Robert J. Hamilton , Siamak Daneshmand
{"title":"Safety of omitting pelvic imaging in patients with stage I germ cell tumor (GCT) on surveillance: A multi-institutional study","authors":"Hamed Ahmadi ,&nbsp;Tarik Benidir ,&nbsp;Alon Lazarovich ,&nbsp;Lynn Anson-Cartwright ,&nbsp;Martin O’Malley ,&nbsp;Scott E. Eggener ,&nbsp;Robert J. Hamilton ,&nbsp;Siamak Daneshmand","doi":"10.1016/j.urolonc.2025.12.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and Objective</h3><div>The preferred management of clinical stage I (CS1) germ cell tumor (GCT) is surveillance. Standard surveillance imaging protocols expose young patients to potential radiation-related consequences and have financial implications. We evaluated the safety of omitting routine pelvic imaging.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Patients with CS1 GCT electing surveillance at 3 major referral centers were included. “Pelvis only” recurrence was defined as those detectable solely on pelvic imaging below the bifurcation of common iliac vessels. Any inguinal recurrence detected on pelvic imaging was considered an “inguinal recurrence.” Standard surveillance imaging protocols were used to estimate radiation dose reduction and cost saving per patient.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 285 patients were included. Forty-three patients (15%) had pelvic/inguinal nodal recurrence and 16/43 (37%) were detectable by imaging alone. However, in 11/16 (69%), pelvic/inguinal nodal disease was either visible on CT abdomen cuts (3) or there was simultaneous retroperitoneal recurrence (8). Only 5/285 (1.7%) patients had pelvis/inguinal recurrence only detectable on CT pelvis. Only 3/220 (1.3%) patients with no prior cryptorchidism or inguinal/scrotal surgery had pelvis only recurrence. The estimated reduction in radiation dose ranged between 2.31 and 3.46 mSv over 5 years with cost savings of 700 to 800 USD per patient. A limitation of the study includes variability in imaging protocols amongst the centers.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Isolated pelvic/inguinal recurrence in CS1 GCT is rare and routine pelvic imaging appears to have limited value. Omitting CT pelvis could also reduce radiation exposure and offers cost-saving.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23408,"journal":{"name":"Urologic Oncology-seminars and Original Investigations","volume":"44 3","pages":"Article 110966"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urologic Oncology-seminars and Original Investigations","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1078143925004831","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/12/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and Objective

The preferred management of clinical stage I (CS1) germ cell tumor (GCT) is surveillance. Standard surveillance imaging protocols expose young patients to potential radiation-related consequences and have financial implications. We evaluated the safety of omitting routine pelvic imaging.

Methods

Patients with CS1 GCT electing surveillance at 3 major referral centers were included. “Pelvis only” recurrence was defined as those detectable solely on pelvic imaging below the bifurcation of common iliac vessels. Any inguinal recurrence detected on pelvic imaging was considered an “inguinal recurrence.” Standard surveillance imaging protocols were used to estimate radiation dose reduction and cost saving per patient.

Results

A total of 285 patients were included. Forty-three patients (15%) had pelvic/inguinal nodal recurrence and 16/43 (37%) were detectable by imaging alone. However, in 11/16 (69%), pelvic/inguinal nodal disease was either visible on CT abdomen cuts (3) or there was simultaneous retroperitoneal recurrence (8). Only 5/285 (1.7%) patients had pelvis/inguinal recurrence only detectable on CT pelvis. Only 3/220 (1.3%) patients with no prior cryptorchidism or inguinal/scrotal surgery had pelvis only recurrence. The estimated reduction in radiation dose ranged between 2.31 and 3.46 mSv over 5 years with cost savings of 700 to 800 USD per patient. A limitation of the study includes variability in imaging protocols amongst the centers.

Conclusion

Isolated pelvic/inguinal recurrence in CS1 GCT is rare and routine pelvic imaging appears to have limited value. Omitting CT pelvis could also reduce radiation exposure and offers cost-saving.
I期生殖细胞瘤(GCT)患者在监测中省略盆腔成像的安全性:一项多机构研究。
背景与目的:临床I期(CS1)生殖细胞瘤(GCT)的首选治疗方法是监测。标准的监测成像方案使年轻患者暴露于与辐射有关的潜在后果,并具有经济影响。我们评估了省略常规盆腔造影的安全性。方法:纳入3个主要转诊中心的CS1 GCT选择监测患者。“仅骨盆”复发定义为仅在髂总血管分叉以下的盆腔显像上可检测到的复发。盆腔造影发现的任何腹股沟复发都被认为是“腹股沟复发”。标准监测成像方案用于估计每位患者的辐射剂量减少和成本节约。结果:共纳入285例患者。43例(15%)患者有盆腔/腹股沟淋巴结复发,16/43(37%)患者仅通过影像学检查即可发现。然而,在11/16(69%)中,盆腔/腹股沟淋巴结疾病在CT腹部切口上可见(3)或同时出现腹膜后复发(8)。只有5/285(1.7%)的患者骨盆/腹股沟复发仅在骨盆CT上检测到。只有3/220(1.3%)没有隐睾或腹股沟/阴囊手术的患者只有骨盆复发。估计5年内减少的辐射剂量在2.31至3.46毫西弗之间,每位患者可节省700至800美元的费用。该研究的局限性包括各中心成像方案的差异。结论:孤立的盆腔/腹股沟复发在CS1 GCT是罕见的,常规盆腔成像的价值有限。省去骨盆CT也可以减少辐射暴露并节省成本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
3.70%
发文量
297
审稿时长
7.6 weeks
期刊介绍: Urologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations is the official journal of the Society of Urologic Oncology. The journal publishes practical, timely, and relevant clinical and basic science research articles which address any aspect of urologic oncology. Each issue comprises original research, news and topics, survey articles providing short commentaries on other important articles in the urologic oncology literature, and reviews including an in-depth Seminar examining a specific clinical dilemma. The journal periodically publishes supplement issues devoted to areas of current interest to the urologic oncology community. Articles published are of interest to researchers and the clinicians involved in the practice of urologic oncology including urologists, oncologists, and radiologists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书