Comparing early practice outcomes of the direct anterior approach in total hip arthroplasty vs alternative approaches in direct anterior fellowship trained surgeons

IF 1.8 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Journal of orthopaedics Pub Date : 2026-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-12-17 DOI:10.1016/j.jor.2025.12.033
Spencer E. Talentino , Nicholas Pappa , Kathryn Fideler , Nicholas J. Greco
{"title":"Comparing early practice outcomes of the direct anterior approach in total hip arthroplasty vs alternative approaches in direct anterior fellowship trained surgeons","authors":"Spencer E. Talentino ,&nbsp;Nicholas Pappa ,&nbsp;Kathryn Fideler ,&nbsp;Nicholas J. Greco","doi":"10.1016/j.jor.2025.12.033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Aims</h3><div>Total hip arthroplasty (THA) approach typically depends on surgeon preference and training. The direct anterior approach (DAA) has increased appeal due to its muscle sparing planes. We evaluated complications of DAA and non-DAA THA by DAA fellowship trained surgeons. We hypothesized complications of DAA THAs would have a noninferior complication profile compared to alternative approaches.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Retrospective review of first 50 DAA and first 50 alternative-approach THAs performed by three fellowship-trained adult reconstruction surgeon's first year practice. Patient demographics, comorbidities, complications, radiographic acetabular inclination, acetabular anteversion, and femoral stem alignment were analyzed. Power analysis, univariate, multivariate regression models completed for analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>150 cases (DAA) and 150 controls (alternative-approach) with median follow-up of 27.7 weeks (194 days). There was a significant difference in sex (56.7 % vs 35.3 % males) and median BMI (29.2 kg/m2 vs 36.5 kg/m2) between groups and no significant difference in total perioperative complications between cases (n = 51 events) and controls (n = 53 events). There were significantly reduced odds of 30 day re-admissions and 90-day ED visits in the DAA patients in univariate analysis (OR = 0.301, p = 0.008 and OR = 0.553, p = 0.045) but no significance in multivariate regression analysis (OR = 0.071, p = 0.104 and OR = 0.445, p = 0.251). Radiographic acetabular cup inclination (p = 0.31), acetabular cup anteversion (p = 1.00) and femoral stem alignment (p = 0.21) had no significant difference between groups.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Formal fellowship training in the DAA, including appropriate technique and patient selection, demonstrates no difference in perioperative complications, 30-day re-admissions, 90-day ED visits compared to alternative approaches, offering DAA fellowship trained surgeons immediate successful outcomes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16633,"journal":{"name":"Journal of orthopaedics","volume":"73 ","pages":"Pages 387-393"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of orthopaedics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0972978X25005136","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/12/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) approach typically depends on surgeon preference and training. The direct anterior approach (DAA) has increased appeal due to its muscle sparing planes. We evaluated complications of DAA and non-DAA THA by DAA fellowship trained surgeons. We hypothesized complications of DAA THAs would have a noninferior complication profile compared to alternative approaches.

Methods

Retrospective review of first 50 DAA and first 50 alternative-approach THAs performed by three fellowship-trained adult reconstruction surgeon's first year practice. Patient demographics, comorbidities, complications, radiographic acetabular inclination, acetabular anteversion, and femoral stem alignment were analyzed. Power analysis, univariate, multivariate regression models completed for analysis.

Results

150 cases (DAA) and 150 controls (alternative-approach) with median follow-up of 27.7 weeks (194 days). There was a significant difference in sex (56.7 % vs 35.3 % males) and median BMI (29.2 kg/m2 vs 36.5 kg/m2) between groups and no significant difference in total perioperative complications between cases (n = 51 events) and controls (n = 53 events). There were significantly reduced odds of 30 day re-admissions and 90-day ED visits in the DAA patients in univariate analysis (OR = 0.301, p = 0.008 and OR = 0.553, p = 0.045) but no significance in multivariate regression analysis (OR = 0.071, p = 0.104 and OR = 0.445, p = 0.251). Radiographic acetabular cup inclination (p = 0.31), acetabular cup anteversion (p = 1.00) and femoral stem alignment (p = 0.21) had no significant difference between groups.

Conclusion

Formal fellowship training in the DAA, including appropriate technique and patient selection, demonstrates no difference in perioperative complications, 30-day re-admissions, 90-day ED visits compared to alternative approaches, offering DAA fellowship trained surgeons immediate successful outcomes.
比较全髋关节置换术中直接前路入路与其他直接前路入路的早期实践结果
全髋关节置换术(THA)入路通常取决于外科医生的偏好和训练。直接前路入路(DAA)由于其肌肉保留平面而增加了吸引力。我们通过接受过DAA奖学金培训的外科医生评估DAA和非DAA手术的并发症。我们假设与其他方法相比,DAA tha的并发症将具有非劣等并发症。方法回顾性分析三位接受过奖学金培训的成人重建术外科医生第一年实施的50例DAA和50例tha手术。分析患者人口统计学、合并症、并发症、髋臼倾斜、髋臼前倾和股骨干对准。功率分析,单变量,多元回归模型完成分析。结果150例(DAA)和150例对照(替代方法),中位随访时间为27.7周(194天)。两组患者在性别(56.7% vs 35.3%男性)和中位BMI (29.2 kg/m2 vs 36.5 kg/m2)方面存在显著差异,两组患者围手术期总并发症(n = 51件)与对照组(n = 53件)无显著差异。在单因素分析中,DAA患者30天再入院和90天ED就诊的几率显著降低(OR = 0.301, p = 0.008和OR = 0.553, p = 0.045),但在多因素回归分析中无显著性差异(OR = 0.071, p = 0.104和OR = 0.445, p = 0.251)。髋臼杯倾斜(p = 0.31)、髋臼杯前倾(p = 1.00)和股骨干对中(p = 0.21)两组间无显著差异。结论正式的DAA奖学金培训,包括适当的技术和患者选择,与其他方法相比,在围手术期并发症、30天再入院、90天急诊科就诊方面没有差异,为DAA奖学金培训的外科医生提供了直接成功的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
6.70%
发文量
202
审稿时长
56 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Orthopaedics aims to be a leading journal in orthopaedics and contribute towards the improvement of quality of orthopedic health care. The journal publishes original research work and review articles related to different aspects of orthopaedics including Arthroplasty, Arthroscopy, Sports Medicine, Trauma, Spine and Spinal deformities, Pediatric orthopaedics, limb reconstruction procedures, hand surgery, and orthopaedic oncology. It also publishes articles on continuing education, health-related information, case reports and letters to the editor. It is requested to note that the journal has an international readership and all submissions should be aimed at specifying something about the setting in which the work was conducted. Authors must also provide any specific reasons for the research and also provide an elaborate description of the results.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书