Patient Encounter Cards Improve Physician and Patient Engagement for New Patient Visits in Orthopaedic Oncology.

IF 2.8 2区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Charlotte F Wahle, Nicole J Newman-Hung, Mikayla R Mefford, Mathangi Sridharan, Alexander B Christ, Nicholas M Bernthal, Duretti T Fufa, Lauren E Wessel
{"title":"Patient Encounter Cards Improve Physician and Patient Engagement for New Patient Visits in Orthopaedic Oncology.","authors":"Charlotte F Wahle, Nicole J Newman-Hung, Mikayla R Mefford, Mathangi Sridharan, Alexander B Christ, Nicholas M Bernthal, Duretti T Fufa, Lauren E Wessel","doi":"10.5435/JAAOS-D-25-00822","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>New patient visits in the orthopaedic oncology clinic are medically complex and emotionally nuanced. Previous orthopaedic literature has shown that clear communication of the diagnosis and plan can be difficult, resulting in worse outcomes. This study aimed to validate the use of a novel patient encounter card (PEC) to improve patient/physician postencounter satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All new patients who presented to the clinics of three fellowship-trained orthopaedic oncologists from September 2023 to March 2025 were included. In the preintervention phase, visits were conducted without modification. Patients were queried on satisfaction, whether concerns were addressed, understanding of the treatment plan, and perceived patient/physician connection. During the intervention phase, a PEC was implemented. The \"patient\" side was completed in the waiting room; the \"physician\" side during the visit. Patients then completed the same postvisit survey. Residents and fellows were surveyed at the end of each clinic. All statistical analysis was done using STATA V18.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 245 patients were surveyed. During the intervention phase, patient scores improved across all 12 patient satisfaction and competency metrics. Following the intervention, 94% of patients strongly agreed that the doctor listened to what they had to say and 93% felt that their main concern had been addressed. Compared with the control group, markedly more patients reported being \"very satisfied\" with their visit ( P = 0.048) and \"very confident\" that they made the most of their visit ( P = 0.041). Markedly more patients also reported that they were involved in their treatment plan as much as they wanted to be ( P = 0.046). Finally, 100% of surveyed physicians believed that the intervention improved clinical efficiency.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PECs improve patient experience and strengthen patient-physician communication while maintaining clinical efficiency in orthopaedic oncology consultations. This simple, low-cost intervention may be effective across a range of medical and surgical specialties.</p>","PeriodicalId":51098,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons","volume":" ","pages":"e1375-e1381"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOS-D-25-00822","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/12/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: New patient visits in the orthopaedic oncology clinic are medically complex and emotionally nuanced. Previous orthopaedic literature has shown that clear communication of the diagnosis and plan can be difficult, resulting in worse outcomes. This study aimed to validate the use of a novel patient encounter card (PEC) to improve patient/physician postencounter satisfaction.

Methods: All new patients who presented to the clinics of three fellowship-trained orthopaedic oncologists from September 2023 to March 2025 were included. In the preintervention phase, visits were conducted without modification. Patients were queried on satisfaction, whether concerns were addressed, understanding of the treatment plan, and perceived patient/physician connection. During the intervention phase, a PEC was implemented. The "patient" side was completed in the waiting room; the "physician" side during the visit. Patients then completed the same postvisit survey. Residents and fellows were surveyed at the end of each clinic. All statistical analysis was done using STATA V18.

Results: A total of 245 patients were surveyed. During the intervention phase, patient scores improved across all 12 patient satisfaction and competency metrics. Following the intervention, 94% of patients strongly agreed that the doctor listened to what they had to say and 93% felt that their main concern had been addressed. Compared with the control group, markedly more patients reported being "very satisfied" with their visit ( P = 0.048) and "very confident" that they made the most of their visit ( P = 0.041). Markedly more patients also reported that they were involved in their treatment plan as much as they wanted to be ( P = 0.046). Finally, 100% of surveyed physicians believed that the intervention improved clinical efficiency.

Conclusion: PECs improve patient experience and strengthen patient-physician communication while maintaining clinical efficiency in orthopaedic oncology consultations. This simple, low-cost intervention may be effective across a range of medical and surgical specialties.

病人接触卡提高了骨科肿瘤科新病人就诊的医生和病人的参与度。
导读:骨科肿瘤门诊的新患者就诊在医学上是复杂的,在情感上是微妙的。先前的骨科文献表明,诊断和计划的清晰沟通可能很困难,导致更糟糕的结果。本研究旨在验证一种新型患者就诊卡(PEC)的使用,以提高患者/医生就诊后满意度。方法:纳入2023年9月至2025年3月期间在三位接受过奖学金培训的骨科肿瘤学家诊所就诊的所有新患者。在干预前阶段,不加修改地进行了访问。对患者的满意度、顾虑是否得到解决、对治疗计划的理解以及对医患关系的感知进行了调查。在干预阶段,实施了PEC。“病人”一面在候诊室完成;“医生”一方在访问期间。然后患者完成同样的随访调查。在每个诊所结束时,对住院医师和研究员进行了调查。所有统计分析均使用STATA V18进行。结果:共调查245例患者。在干预阶段,患者在所有12项患者满意度和能力指标上的得分都有所提高。干预后,94%的患者强烈同意医生倾听了他们的心声,93%的患者认为他们的主要担忧得到了解决。与对照组相比,更多的患者报告对他们的就诊“非常满意”(P = 0.048),“非常有信心”他们充分利用了他们的就诊(P = 0.041)。更多的患者还报告说,他们尽可能多地参与治疗计划(P = 0.046)。最后,100%的受访医生认为干预提高了临床效率。结论:PECs在保持骨科肿瘤会诊临床效率的同时,改善了患者体验,加强了医患沟通。这种简单、低成本的干预措施可能在一系列医学和外科专业中有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
6.20%
发文量
529
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons was established in the fall of 1993 by the Academy in response to its membership’s demand for a clinical review journal. Two issues were published the first year, followed by six issues yearly from 1994 through 2004. In September 2005, JAAOS began publishing monthly issues. Each issue includes richly illustrated peer-reviewed articles focused on clinical diagnosis and management. Special features in each issue provide commentary on developments in pharmacotherapeutics, materials and techniques, and computer applications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书